Extraction of Arsenic from Soils Contaminated with Wood Preservation Chemicals

被引:7
作者
Amofah, Lea Rastas [1 ]
Maurice, Christian [1 ]
Bhattacharya, Prosun [2 ]
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Civil Min & Environm Engn, Div Architecture & Infrastruct, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
[2] KTH, Royal Inst Technol, Dept Land & Water Resources Engn, Int Groundwater Arsen Res Grp, Stockholm, Sweden
来源
SOIL & SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION | 2010年 / 19卷 / 02期
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
arsenic; CCA; contaminated soil; extraction; soil washing; SEQUENTIAL EXTRACTION; SIZE FRACTIONS; IRON-OXIDES; CHROMIUM; COPPER; REMEDIATION; SPECIATION; SEDIMENTS; MOBILITY; ADSORPTION;
D O I
10.1080/15320380903390539
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Three soil samples contaminated by chromated zinc arsenate (CZA) or chromated copper arsenate (CCA) were investigated in a laboratory scale to study As mobilization and to identify a chemical agent that could be used in soil washing to extract arsenic. Besides high As extraction, the cost, occupational health issues and technical aspects were considered when selecting the chemical. Arsenic is strongly bound to CZA/CCA soils; only similar to 50% of the tot-As was removed from water-washed soils. High Fe or Al mobilization is not necessarily indicative of high As removal from CZA/CCA soils. A high Cu/As-ratio and a large amount of soluble Ca in the soil hampered As extraction. The high ratio can be an indication of stable Cu-arsenates in soil. Calcium can react with the extraction agent or with As during extraction. Sodium hydroxide, dithionite with citrate (and oxalate) (dithionite solutions), and oxalate with citrate were the most efficient chemicals for removing As from the soils. The disadvantages of using these strong chemicals are: a high cost (oxalate with citrate); damage to equipment (dithionite solutions); an adverse impact on occupational health (dithionite solutions); or a deterioration in soil quality after extraction (NaOH and dithionite solutons). Phosphate, solutions based on NH2OH center dot HCl, or citrate were not efficient in mobilizing As from the soils.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 159
页数:18
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Removal of arsenic from contaminated soils using different salt extractants [J].
Alam, M. G. M. ;
Tokunaga, S. ;
Stagnitti, F. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 42 (04) :447-451
[2]  
Allison JerryD., 1991, MINTEQA2PRODEFA2 GEO
[3]  
Andersen S, 1996, FRESEN J ANAL CHEM, V354, P676
[4]  
Andersson A., 1991, 3990 SWED ENV PROT A
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CERCLA PRIOR LIST HA
[6]   Partitioning and speciation of chromium, copper, and arsenic in CCA-contaminated soils:: influence of soil composition [J].
Balasoiu, CF ;
Zagury, GJ ;
Deschênes, L .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 280 (1-3) :239-255
[7]   Metal contamination at a wood preservation site: characterisation and experimental studies on remediation [J].
Bhattacharya, P ;
Mukherjee, AB ;
Jacks, G ;
Nordqvist, S .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 290 (1-3) :165-180
[8]  
Loeppert R. H., 1996, Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 - chemical methods., P639
[9]   Leaching of copper, chromium, and arsenic through some free-draining New Zealand soils [J].
Carey, PL ;
McLaren, RG ;
Cameron, KC ;
Sedcole, JR .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1996, 34 (04) :583-597
[10]   EXTRACTION TECHNIQUES FOR SELECTIVE DISSOLUTION OF AMORPHOUS IRON-OXIDES FROM SOILS AND SEDIMENTS [J].
CHAO, TT ;
ZHOU, L .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1983, 47 (02) :225-232