Voiding Trial in Office after Unsuccessful Voiding Trial in Postoperative Unit: How Many More Days Is Enough?

被引:8
作者
Behbehani, Sadikah [1 ]
Pham, Tiffany [2 ]
Kunze, Katie [1 ]
Wasson, Megan [1 ]
Yi, Johnny [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Fresno, CA USA
关键词
Voiding trial; Outpatient hysterectomy; Urinary retention; Minimally invasive hysterectomy; LONG-TERM CATHETERIZATION; URINARY-TRACT-INFECTION; COMPARING SHORT; RISK-FACTORS; RETENTION; HYSTERECTOMY; OUTPATIENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To determine the incidence of a successful in-office voiding trial after minimally invasive hysterectomy. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: A tertiary care academic center. Patients: All patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomies (vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic) from January 2013 to July 2018 who have an unsuccessful voiding trial in the postoperative unit. Interventions: A voiding trial. Measurements and Main Results: Of 558 outpatient hysterectomies (with same-day discharge) performed in the time period of interest, 174 patients were discharged home with a Foley catheter (31%). Of those patients, 37% presented for a repeat in-office voiding trial at less than 3 postoperative days, 31% presented at 3 postoperative days, and 31.6% presented at more than 3 postoperative days. Eighty-six percent of patients presenting for their first in-office voiding trial were successful at voiding. There were no differences noted in age, gravity, parity, the use of hormone replacement therapy, menopausal status, smoking, hypertension, or diabetes in patients who passed their first in-office voiding trial compared with those who did not. Vaginal hysterectomy was the most common route of hysterectomy and was performed in 57% of cases followed by robotic hysterectomy in 32%. There were no differences noted in the indication or route of hysterectomy between patients who pass or fail their first in-office voiding trial. At the time of hysterectomy, 47% of patients had concomitant female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery procedures performed (midurethral sling, periurethral injections, or colporrhaphy). The incidence of urinary tract infections in this patient cohort was 12%, but the incidence was significantly higher in patients who failed compared with those who passed their first in-office voiding trial (37.3% vs 7.3%, p <.001). After adjusting for age, hysterectomy route, and concomitant female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery procedures performed, the number of postoperative days at the time of the first in-office voiding trial does not predict success. Conclusion: The timing of the repeat in-office voiding trial in posthysterectomy patients who fail their initial voiding trial in the postanesthesia care unit was not related to success. The incidence of urinary tract infections is higher in patients who fail their repeat voiding trial because recatheterization and a longer duration of catherization are necessary. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AAGL.
引用
收藏
页码:1376 / 1382
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] A prospective, randomized trial comparing immediate versus delayed catheter removal following hysterectomy
    Alessandri, Franco
    Mistrangelo, Emanuela
    Lijoi, Davide
    Ferrero, Simone
    Ragni, Nicola
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (06) : 716 - 720
  • [2] Dawson Melissa L, 2018, Curr Urol, V11, P212, DOI 10.1159/000447221
  • [3] Are in-dwelling catheters necessary for 24 hours after hysterectomy?
    Dunn, TS
    Shlay, J
    Forshner, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (02) : 435 - 437
  • [4] A randomized, controlled trial evaluating 2 techniques of postoperative bladder testing after transvaginal surgery
    Foster, Raymond T.
    Borawski, Kristy M.
    South, Mary M.
    Weidner, Alison C.
    Webster, George D.
    Amundsen, Cindy L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : 627.e1 - 627.e4
  • [5] How long should urinary bladder catheterisation be continued after vaginal prolapse surgery? - A randomised controlled trial comparing short term versus long term catheterisation after vaginal prolapse surgery
    Hakvoort, RA
    Elberink, R
    Vollebregt, A
    Van der Ploeg, T
    Emanuel, MH
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 111 (08) : 828 - 830
  • [6] Predicting Short-Term Urinary Retention After Vaginal Prolapse Surgery
    Hakvoort, Robert A.
    Dijkgraaf, Marcel G.
    Burger, Matthe P.
    Emanuel, Mark H.
    Roovers, Jan Paul W. R.
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2009, 28 (03) : 225 - 228
  • [7] Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America
    Hooton, Thomas M.
    Bradley, Suzanne F.
    Cardenas, Diana D.
    Colgan, Richard
    Geerlings, Suzanne E.
    Rice, James C.
    Saint, Sanjay
    Schaeffer, Anthony J.
    Tambayh, Paul A.
    Tenke, Peter
    Nicolle, Lindsay E.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 50 (05) : 625 - 663
  • [8] Optimal duration of urinary catheterization after anterior colporrhaphy
    Huang, Chih Cheng
    Ou, Chau Su
    Yeh, Guang Pern
    Tsai, Horng Der
    Sun, Mou Jong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 22 (04) : 485 - 491
  • [9] A randomized controlled trial comparing short versus long-term catheterization after uncomplicated vaginal prolapse surgery
    Kamilya, Gourisankar
    Seal, Subrata Lall
    Mukherji, Joydev
    Bhattacharyya, Subir Kumar
    Hazra, Avijit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2010, 36 (01) : 154 - 158
  • [10] Length of Catheter Use After Hysterectomy as a Risk Factor for Urinary Tract Infection
    Karp, Natalie E.
    Kobernik, Emily K.
    Kamdar, Neil S.
    Fore, Amanda M.
    Morgan, Daniel M.
    [J]. FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 24 (06): : 430 - 434