European DEMO design strategy and consequences for materials

被引:251
作者
Federici, G. [1 ]
Biel, W. [2 ,3 ]
Gilbert, M. R. [4 ]
Kemp, R. [4 ]
Taylor, N. [4 ]
Wenninger, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] EUROfus Consortium, Boltzmannstr 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany
[2] Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH, Inst Energy & Climate Res, Julich, Germany
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Appl Phys, Ghent, Belgium
[4] CCFE Culham Sci Ctr, Abingdon OX14 3DB, Oxon, England
关键词
demonstration fusion reactor; ITER; technical readiness; materials nuclear design requirements; radiation damage; POWER-PLANT; HEAT-FLUX; FUSION; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1088/1741-4326/57/9/092002
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Demonstrating the production of net electricity and operating with a closed fuel-cycle remain unarguably the crucial steps towards the exploitation of fusion power. These are the aims of a demonstration fusion reactor (DEMO) proposed to be built after ITER. This paper briefly describes the DEMO design options that are being considered in Europe for the current conceptual design studies as part of the Roadmap to Fusion Electricity Horizon 2020. These are not intended to represent fixed and exclusive design choices but rather 'proxies' of possible plant design options to be used to identify generic design/material issues that need to be resolved in future fusion reactor systems. The materials nuclear design requirements and the effects of radiation damage are briefly analysed with emphasis on a pulsed 'low extrapolation' system, which is being used for the initial design integration studies, based as far as possible on mature technologies and reliable regimes of operation (to be extrapolated from the ITER experience), and on the use of materials suitable for the expected level of neutron fluence. The main technical issues arising from the plasma and nuclear loads and the effects of radiation damage particularly on the structural and heat sink materials of the vessel and in-vessel components are critically discussed. The need to establish realistic target performance and a development schedule for near-term electricity production tends to favour more conservative technology choices. The readiness of the technical (physics and technology) assumptions that are being made is expected to be an important factor for the selection of the technical features of the device.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] AFCEN, 2013, COD DES CONSTR RUL M
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, BOIL PRESS VESS COD
  • [3] Bachmann C., 2016, FUSION ENG DES
  • [4] Barabash V., 2010, FUSION ENG DES, V85, P192
  • [5] Batistoni P, 2010, 4967 CCEFU
  • [6] DEMO diagnostics and burn control
    Biel, Wolfgang
    de Baar, Marco
    Dinklage, Andreas
    Felici, Federico
    Koenig, Ralf
    Meister, Hans
    Treutterer, Wolfgang
    Wenninger, Ronald
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2015, 96-97 : 8 - 15
  • [7] Boccaccini L.V, 2016, FUSION ENG DES
  • [8] Is nuclear fusion a sustainable energy form?
    Bradshaw, A. M.
    Hamacher, T.
    Fischer, U.
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2011, 86 (9-11) : 2770 - 2773
  • [9] Camarcat N., 2009, P GLOB PAR FRANC 6 1
  • [10] On the EU approach for DEMO architecture exploration and dealing with uncertainties
    Coleman, M.
    Maviglia, F.
    Bachmann, C.
    Anthony, J.
    Federici, G.
    Shannon, M.
    Wenninger, R.
    [J]. FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2016, 109 : 1158 - 1162