LI-RADS and transplantation: challenges and controversies

被引:8
作者
Cunha, Guilherme M. [1 ]
Tamayo-Murillo, Dorathy E. [2 ]
Fowler, Kathryn J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol, Liver Imaging Grp, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Radiol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Imaging diagnosis; Staging; Transplantation; PORTAL-VEIN THROMBOSIS; CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT RESPONSE; GADOXETIC ACID; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; ORGAN PROCUREMENT; MRI; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-019-02311-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Patients with early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) can be cured by liver transplantation. HCC imaging features on CT or MRI are specific enough to allow for definitive diagnosis and treatment without the need of confirmatory biopsy. When applied to the appropriate at-risk population the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) imaging criteria achieve high specificity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of HCC. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) is the United States organization that aims to assure the adequate and fair distribution of livers across candidates. Given the importance of fair organ allocation, OPTN also provides stringent imaging criteria for the diagnosis of HCC aiming to avoid false positive diagnosis. Although most imaging criteria are identical for both systems, discrepancies between LI-RADS and the current OPTN classification system for HCC diagnosis exists. Main differences include, but are not limited to, the binary approach of OPTN to classify lesions as HCC or not, versus the probabilistic algorithmic approach of LI-RADS, technical and interpretation considerations, and the approach towards treated lesions. The purpose of this article is to highlight the similarities and discrepancies between LI-RADS and the current OPTN criteria for HCC diagnosis and the implications that these differences may have on the management of patients who are transplant candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 42
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma by Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MRI: Comparison with triple phase 64 detector row helical CT
    Akai, Hiroyuki
    Kiryu, Shigeru
    Matsuda, Izuru
    Satou, Jirou
    Takao, Hidemasa
    Tajima, Taku
    Watanabe, Yasushi
    Imamura, Hiroshi
    Kokudo, Norihiro
    Akahane, Masaaki
    Ohtomo, Kuni
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 80 (02) : 310 - 315
  • [2] Curative Resection of Single Primary Hepatic Malignancy: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Category LR-M Portends a Worse Prognosis
    An, Chansik
    Park, Sumi
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Kim, Do-Young
    Kim, Seung-Seob
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Choi, Jin-Young
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (03) : 576 - 583
  • [3] Diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): current guidelines
    Ayuso, Carmen
    Rimola, Jordi
    Vilana, Ramon
    Burrel, Marta
    Darnell, Anna
    Garcia-Criado, Angeles
    Bianchi, Luis
    Belmonte, Ernest
    Caparroz, Carla
    Barrufet, Marta
    Bruix, Jordi
    Bru, Concepcion
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 101 : 72 - 81
  • [4] Concordance of hypervascular liver nodule characterization between the organ procurement and transplant network and liver imaging reporting and data system classifications
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Huang, Rong
    Mayes, Nicholas
    Marin, Daniele
    Berg, Carl L.
    Nelson, Rendon C.
    Jaffe, Tracy A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (02) : 305 - 314
  • [5] Hepatocellular carcinoma in a North American population: Does hepatobiliary MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA improve sensitivity and confidence for diagnosis?
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    Davenport, Matthew S.
    Allen, Brian C.
    Jaffe, Tracy A.
    Ho, Lisa M.
    Boll, Daniel T.
    Merkle, Elmar M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 37 (02) : 398 - 406
  • [6] Interobserver agreement of semi-automated and manual measurements of functional MRI metrics of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Bonekamp, David
    Bonekamp, Susanne
    Halappa, Vivek Gowdra
    Geschwind, Jean-Francois H.
    Eng, John
    Corona-Villalobos, Celia Pamela
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (03) : 487 - 496
  • [7] MR-imaging features of hepatocellular carcinoma capsule appearance in cirrhotic liver: comparison of gadoxetic acid and gadobenate dimeglumine
    Burgio, Marco Dioguardi
    Picone, Dario
    Cabibbo, Giuseppe
    Midiri, Massimo
    Lagalla, Roberto
    Brancatelli, Giuseppe
    [J]. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (08) : 1546 - 1554
  • [8] Differentiation of Malignant Thrombus from Bland Thrombus of the Portal Vein in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Application of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging
    Catalano, Onofrio A.
    Choy, Garry
    Zhu, Andrew
    Hahn, Peter F.
    Sahani, Dushyant V.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2010, 254 (01) : 154 - 162
  • [9] Assessing Patients With hepatocellular Carcinoma Meeting the Milan Criteria: Is Liver 3 Tesla MR With Gadoxetic Acid Necessary in Addition to Liver CT?
    Cha, Dong Ik
    Lee, Min Woo
    Kim, Young Kon
    Kim, Seong Hyun
    Park, Hyun Jeong
    Rhim, Hyunchul
    Lim, Hyo K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 39 (04) : 842 - 852
  • [10] CHARACTERIZATION OF MALIGNANT PORTAL VEIN THROMBOSIS WITH CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASONOGRAPHY
    Chammas, Maria C.
    Oliveira, Andre C.
    D'Avilla, Mario J.
    Moraes, Pedro H.
    Takahashi, Marcelo Straus
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 45 (01) : 50 - 55