THE ROLE OF TIME PREFERENCES IN THE INTERGENERATIONAL TRANSFER OF SMOKING

被引:6
作者
Brown, Heather [1 ]
van der Pol, Marjon [2 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Econ Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
intergenerational transfer; smoking; time preference; decomposition analysis; MODELS; TRANSMISSION; DEMAND; PROBIT; HEALTH; LOGIT; RISK;
D O I
10.1002/hec.2987
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Evidence suggests that maternal and offspring smoking behaviour is correlated. Little is known about the mechanisms through which this intergenerational transfer occurs. This paper explores the role of time preferences. Although time preference is likely to be heritable and correlated with health investments, its role in the intergenerational transmission of smoking has not been explored previously. This is the first paper to empirically test this. Data (2002, 2003, 2004, 2006 and 2008) from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia are used. Estimates by using a pooled probit model show that there is not a direct effect of maternal time preference, measured in terms of financial planning horizon, on the likelihood that their offspring is a smoker. However, there is an indirect effect of maternal time preference. Sons of mothers that are smokers and have a shorter planning horizon are 6% more likely to smoke than if their mother had a longer planning horizon, and daughters of mothers that smoke with a shorter planning horizon are 7% more likely to smoke themselves than if their mother had a longer planning horizon. (c) 2013 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1493 / 1501
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Time perspective, personality and smoking, body mass, and physical activity: An empirical study [J].
Adams, Jean ;
Nettle, Daniel .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 14 :83-105
[2]   Interaction terms in logit and probit models [J].
Ai, CR ;
Norton, EC .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 80 (01) :123-129
[3]   The endogenous determination of time preference [J].
Becker, GS ;
Mulligan, CB .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (03) :729-758
[4]   The economics of cultural transmission and the dynamics of preferences [J].
Bisin, A ;
Verdier, T .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2001, 97 (02) :298-319
[5]   The inheritance of inequality [J].
Bowles, S ;
Gintis, H .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 16 (03) :3-30
[6]   Stata tip 87: Interpretation of interactions in nonlinear models [J].
Buis, Maarten L. .
STATA JOURNAL, 2010, 10 (02) :305-308
[7]   Partial effects in probit and logit models with a triple dummy-variable interaction term [J].
Cornelissen, Thomas ;
Sonderhof, Katja .
STATA JOURNAL, 2009, 9 (04) :571-583
[8]   Parental education, grade attainment and earnings expectations among university students [J].
Delaney, Liam ;
Harmon, Colm ;
Redmond, Cathy .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2011, 30 (06) :1136-1152
[9]   CONCEPT OF HEALTH CAPITAL AND DEMAND FOR HEALTH [J].
GROSSMAN, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1972, 80 (02) :223-225
[10]   Time preference, time discounting, and smoking decisions [J].
Khwaja, Ahmed ;
Silverman, Dan ;
Sloan, Frank .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2007, 26 (05) :927-949