How much of a priority is treating erectile dysfunction? A study of patients' perceptions

被引:4
作者
Rance, J
Phillips, C
Davies, S
O'Malley, B
Zaman, Q
Price, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Morriston Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Diabet, Swansea SA5 5LS, W Glam, Wales
[2] Univ Wales Swansea, Swansea Clin Sch, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
[3] Univ Wales Coll Cardiff, Sch Hlth Sci, Cardiff CF1 3NS, S Glam, Wales
[4] Gen Hosp Kettering, Kettering, England
关键词
erectile dysfunction; diabetes; treatment; priority;
D O I
10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00903.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one complication of diabetes for which the treatment is rationed. Despite considerable public debate there has been no formal assessment of the views of patients and sufferers of the priority of treating ED. Aims To determine the perceptions of diabetic patients of the relative priority of treating ED in comparison with treatments for other diabetic complications and common medical conditions. Methods Psychological measures were used to assess subjects' perceptions of the relative importance of ED in comparison with eight other common problems (blindness, foot ulcers, high blood pressure, impotence, kidney disease, high cholesterol, migraine, mild indigestion and sleeping difficulties). The concept of willingness to pay was used to assess the amount per month participants would be prepared to pay for treatment for ED and other conditions. Four groups (controls, healthy diabetic men, impotent diabetic men and impotent diabetic men not in a sexual relationship) were studied. Results Significant differences were found between the four groups with regard to the ranking of the importance of ED compared with other health problems. Impotent diabetic male patients were prepared to pay more for treatment for their condition than all other conditions except blindness and renal failure. Conclusions Men with diabetes, in particular ED sufferers, believe ED has a major impact on quality of life and is as important to treat as many other conditions associated with diabetes.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 209
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Association of type and duration of diabetes with erectile dysfunction in a large cohort of men [J].
Bacon, CG ;
Hu, FB ;
Giovannucci, E ;
Glasser, DB ;
Mittleman, MA ;
Rimm, EB .
DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (08) :1458-1463
[2]   Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction: results of the 'Cologne Male Survey' [J].
Braun, M ;
Wassmer, G ;
Klotz, T ;
Reifenrath, B ;
Mathers, M ;
Engelmann, U .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2000, 12 (06) :305-311
[3]   Erectile dysfunction is a marker for cardiovascular complications and psychological functioning in men with hypertension [J].
Burchardt, M ;
Burchardt, T ;
Anastasiadis, AG ;
Kiss, AJ ;
Shabsigh, A ;
de La Taille, A ;
Pawar, RV ;
Baer, L ;
Shabsigh, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2001, 13 (05) :276-281
[4]   Sex, drugs, and hypertension: a methodological approach for studying a sensitive subject [J].
Duncan, LE ;
Lewis, C ;
Smith, CE ;
Jenkins, P ;
Nichols, M ;
Pearson, TA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPOTENCE RESEARCH, 2001, 13 (01) :31-40
[5]   Sexual problems: a study of the prevalence and need for health care in the general population [J].
Dunn, KM ;
Croft, PR ;
Hackett, GI .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1998, 15 (06) :519-524
[6]   Puzzling out priorities - Why we must acknowledge that rationing is a political process [J].
Klein, R .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7164) :959-960
[7]   New insights into erectile dysfunction: A practical approach [J].
Korenman, SG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 105 (02) :135-144
[8]  
Kwok Y S, 1999, Eff Clin Pract, V2, P171
[9]   SF-36 scores vary by method of administration: implications for study design [J].
Lyons, RA ;
Wareham, K ;
Lucas, M ;
Price, D ;
Williams, J ;
Hutchings, HA .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1999, 21 (01) :41-45
[10]   Annual cost of erectile dysfunction to UK society [J].
Plumb, JM ;
Guest, JF .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1999, 16 (06) :699-709