Discrete Vibro-Tactile Feedback Prevents Object Slippage in Hand Prostheses More Intuitively Than Other Modalities

被引:40
作者
Aboseria, Mohamed [1 ,2 ]
Clemente, Francesco [1 ]
Engels, Leonard F. [1 ]
Cipriani, Christian [1 ]
机构
[1] Scuola Super Sant Anna, BioRobot Inst, I-56025 Pontedera, Italy
[2] Suny Downstate Med Ctr, Coll Med, Brooklyn, NY 11203 USA
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Myoelectric prosthesis; prosthetic hand; sensory feedback; slip feedback; unexpected event; GRIP FORCE CONTROL; NERVE REPAIR; LIMB PROSTHESES; MOTOR CONTROL; REACTION-TIME; MANIPULATION; AMPUTEES; SIGNALS; HUMANS; NOISE;
D O I
10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2851617
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
In the case of a hand amputation, the affected can use myoelectric prostheses to substitute the missing limb and regain motor functionality. Unfortunately, these prostheses do not restore sensory feedback, thus users are forced to rely on vision to avoid object slippage. This is cognitively taxing, as it requires continuous attention to the task. Thus, providing functionally effective sensory feedback is pivotal to reduce the occurrence of slip events and reduce the users' cognitive burden. However, only a few studies investigated which kind of feedback is the most effective for this purpose, mostly using unrealistic experimental scenarios. Here we attempt a more realistic simulation of involuntary hand opening and subsequent recovery of a stable grasp of the slipping object using a robotic hand operated by the subjects through a standard myoelectric control interface. We compared three stimulation modalities (vision, continuous grip force feedback, and discrete slip feedback) and found that the discrete feedback allowed subjects to have higher success rates (close to 100%) in terms of objects recovered from slippage, basically requiring no learning. These results suggest that this simple yet effective feedback can be used to reduce grasp failures in prosthetic users, increasing their confidence in the device.
引用
收藏
页码:1577 / 1584
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]   Sensory relearning after nerve repair [J].
Lundborg, G ;
Rosén, B .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9284) :809-810
[22]   ON THE REDUCTION OF CHOICE REACTION-TIMES WITH PRACTICE [J].
MOWBRAY, GH ;
RHOADES, MV .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1959, 11 (01) :16-23
[23]   How predictive is grip force control in the complete absence of somatosensory feedback? [J].
Nowak, DA ;
Glasauer, S ;
Hermsdörfer, J .
BRAIN, 2004, 127 :182-192
[24]   On the viability of implantable electrodes for the natural control of artificial limbs: Review and discussion [J].
Ortiz-Catalan, Max ;
Branemark, Rickard ;
Hakansson, Bo ;
Delbeke, Jean .
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2012, 11
[25]   Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses [J].
Parker, P. ;
Englehart, K. ;
Hudgins, B. .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (06) :541-548
[26]   Maturation and experience in action representation: Bilateral deficits in unilateral congenital amelia [J].
Philip, B. A. ;
Buckon, C. ;
Sienko, S. ;
Aiona, M. ;
Ross, S. ;
Frey, S. H. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2015, 75 :420-430
[27]   NERVE REPAIR - CORRELATION OF RESTITUTION OF FUNCTIONAL SENSIBILITY WITH SPECIFIC COGNITIVE CAPACITIES [J].
ROSEN, B ;
LUNDBORG, G ;
DAHLIN, LB ;
HOLMBERG, J ;
KARLSON, B .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 1994, 19B (04) :452-458
[28]   Error Correction, Sensory Prediction, and Adaptation in Motor Control [J].
Shadmehr, Reza ;
Smith, Maurice A. ;
Krakauer, John W. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, VOL 33, 2010, 33 :89-108
[29]   Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review [J].
Sigrist, Roland ;
Rauter, Georg ;
Riener, Robert ;
Wolf, Peter .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2013, 20 (01) :21-53
[30]   Object Manipulation Improvements Due to Single Session Training Outweigh the Differences Among Stimulation Sites During Vibrotactile Feedback [J].
Stepp, Cara E. ;
Matsuoka, Yoky .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2011, 19 (06) :677-685