Mitigating Concurrent False Data Injection Attacks in Cooperative DC Microgrids

被引:40
作者
Zhang, Jingqiu [1 ]
Sahoo, Subham [2 ]
Peng, Jimmy Chih-Hsien [1 ]
Blaabjerg, Frede [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Singapore 117583, Singapore
[2] Aalborg Univ, Dept Energy Technol, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
Microgrids; Voltage control; Cyberattack; Observers; Consensus protocol; Voltage measurement; Matrix converters; Cyber attack detection and mitigation; dc microgrid; distributed control; EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION; VOLTAGE REGULATION; FAULT-DETECTION; TOPOLOGY;
D O I
10.1109/TPEL.2021.3055215
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Limited global information in dc microgrids with distributed cooperative control makes them vulnerable to cyber attacks, which can lead to their destabilization and shut down. Here, we discuss a novel false data injection attack (FDIA) model, termed as the concurrent attack, that can compromise local and communicated estimated voltages simultaneously. We formalize that such an attack could be disguised as a conventional FDIA on the estimated voltages transmitted in communication links (termed as the communication link attack), thereby masking the presence of the attack on local estimated voltages and rendering corresponding mitigation attempts ineffective. Second, we present an energy-based detection strategy based on the intrinsic mode functions obtained using the ensemble empirical mode decomposition method. Further, a differentiation criterion using the voltage correction terms generated from the voltage observer is employed to help distinguish between the concurrent attack and the communication link attack. An event-driven mitigation strategy is then used to replace the attacked signal with a reconstructed signal. Finally, the efficacy of the proposed resilient control scheme is demonstrated using both simulations and experimental results.
引用
收藏
页码:9637 / 9647
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [11] Gallo A. J., 2018, 2018 European Control Conference (ECC), P344, DOI 10.23919/ECC.2018.8550549
  • [12] Huang NE., 1998, P ROY SOC LONDON A, V454, P903
  • [13] AC-microgrids versus DC-microgrids with distributed energy resources: A review
    Justo, Jackson John
    Mwasilu, Francis
    Lee, Ju
    Jung, Jin-Woo
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 24 : 387 - 405
  • [14] False Data Injection Attacks against State Estimation in Electric Power Grids
    Liu, Yao
    Ning, Peng
    Reiter, Michael K.
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION AND SYSTEM SECURITY, 2011, 14 (01)
  • [15] An Improved Droop Control Method for DC Microgrids Based on Low Bandwidth Communication With DC Bus Voltage Restoration and Enhanced Current Sharing Accuracy
    Lu, Xiaonan
    Guerrero, Josep M.
    Sun, Kai
    Vasquez, Juan C.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS, 2014, 29 (04) : 1800 - 1812
  • [16] Detection of Faults and Attacks Including False Data Injection Attack in Smart Grid Using Kalman Filter
    Manandhar, Kebina
    Cao, Xiaojun
    Hu, Fei
    Liu, Yao
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL OF NETWORK SYSTEMS, 2014, 1 (04): : 370 - 379
  • [17] Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays
    Olfati-Saber, R
    Murray, RM
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2004, 49 (09) : 1520 - 1533
  • [18] Pasqualetti F, 2015, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P5801, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2015.7403131
  • [19] Attack Detection and Identification in Cyber-Physical Systems
    Pasqualetti, Fabio
    Doerfler, Florian
    Bullo, Francesco
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2013, 58 (11) : 2715 - 2729
  • [20] How weaponizing disinformation can bring down a city's power grid
    Raman, Gururaghav
    AlShebli, Bedoor
    Waniek, Marcin
    Rahwan, Talal
    Peng, Jimmy Chih-Hsien
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):