The significance of circumscribed malignant mammographic masses in the surveillance of BRCA 1/2 gene mutation carriers

被引:33
作者
Kaas, R
Kroger, R
Hendriks, JHCL
Besnard, APE
Koops, W
Pameijer, FA
Prevoo, W
Loo, CE
Muller, SH
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Dept Surg, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Dept Radiol, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Dutch Reference Ctr Breast Canc Screening, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
BRCA 1/2 gene mutation carriers; circumscribed mammographic lesions; surveillance; high grade breast cancers;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-004-2307-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Breast cancers in gene mutation carriers may escape mammographic detection because of rapid growth and tumor expansion. Therefore, they may mimic benign lesions on the mammogram. Twenty-nine BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers under surveillance developed 31 breast cancers between 1994 and 2001 at a mean age of 44.2 years. Controls were 63 women with 67 breast cancers in the same period at a mean age of 53.8 years, also under surveillance because of a life time risk of at least 15%. In 26% of the carriers vs. 48% of the controls, mammography was the method that first suspected a malignancy. Seven radiologists performed a retrospective review of the original mammograms to establish technical assessment, with special attention for circumscribed lesions and estimated probability of malignancy. In the mutation carriers seven (23%) circumscribed non-calcified mammographic masses were found and three in the controls (4.5%) P=0.01. These masses were proven to be malignant. In both groups around 70% of these fast-growing circumscribed lesions were detected by the patients. The masses were situated in breasts with a good interpretable breast pattern. BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers had a significantly higher percentage of circumscribed non-calcified mammographic masses that proved to be malignant. These mammographic lesions in women at high risk should be described as at least Birads 0 and worked-up with ultrasound and needle biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:1647 / 1653
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk [J].
Brekelmans, CTM ;
Seynaeve, C ;
Bartels, CCM ;
Tilanus-Linthorst, MMA ;
Meijers-Heijboer, EJ ;
Crepin, CMG ;
van Geel, AN ;
Menke, M ;
Verhoog, LC ;
van den Ouweland, A ;
Obdeijn, IM ;
Klijn, JGM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (04) :924-930
[2]   Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer .2. BRCA1 and BRCA2 [J].
Burke, W ;
Daly, M ;
Garber, J ;
Botkin, J ;
Kahn, MJE ;
Lynch, P ;
McTierman, A ;
Offit, K ;
Perlman, J ;
Petersen, G ;
Thomson, E ;
Varricchio, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 277 (12) :997-1003
[3]   The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties -: A collaborative evaluation [J].
Duffy, SW ;
Tabár, L ;
Chen, HH ;
Holmqvist, M ;
Yen, MF ;
Abdsalah, S ;
Epstein, B ;
Frodis, E ;
Ljungberg, E ;
Hedborg-Melander, C ;
Sundbom, A ;
Tholin, M ;
Wiege, M ;
Åkerlund, A ;
Wu, HM ;
Tung, TS ;
Chiu, YH ;
Chiu, CP ;
Huang, CC ;
Smith, RA ;
Rosén, M ;
Stenbeck, M ;
Holmberg, L .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (03) :458-469
[4]   American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening [J].
Feig, SA ;
D'Orsi, CJ ;
Hendrick, RE ;
Jackson, VP ;
Kopans, DB ;
Monsees, B ;
Sickles, EA ;
Stelling, CB ;
Zinninger, M ;
Wilcox-Buchalla, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) :29-33
[5]   Impact of mammographic interval on stage and survival after the diagnosis of contralateral breast cancer [J].
Kaas, R ;
Hart, AAM ;
Besnard, APE ;
Peterse, JL ;
Rutgers, EJT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 88 (01) :123-127
[6]   Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: Preliminary results [J].
Kuhl, CK ;
Schmutzler, RK ;
Leutner, CC ;
Kempe, A ;
Wardelmann, E ;
Hocke, A ;
Maringa, M ;
Pfeifer, U ;
Krebs, D ;
Schild, HH .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (01) :267-279
[7]  
Lakhani SR, 2000, CLIN CANCER RES, V6, P782
[8]   Multifactorial analysis of differences between sporadic breast cancers and cancers involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations [J].
Lakhani, SR ;
Jacquemier, J ;
Sloane, JP ;
Gusterson, BA ;
Anderson, TJ ;
van de Vijver, MJ ;
Farid, LM ;
Venter, D ;
Antoniou, A ;
Storfer-Isser, A ;
Smyth, E ;
Steel, CM ;
Haites, N ;
Scott, RJ ;
Goldgar, D ;
Neuhausen, S ;
Daly, PA ;
Ormiston, W ;
McManus, R ;
Scherneck, S ;
Ponder, BAJ ;
Ford, D ;
Peto, J ;
Stoppa-Lyonnet, D ;
Bignon, YJ ;
Struewing, JP ;
Spurr, NK ;
Bishop, DT ;
Klijn, JGM ;
Devilee, P ;
Cornelisse, CJ ;
Lasset, C ;
Lenoir, G ;
Barkardottir, RB ;
Egilsson, V ;
Hamann, U ;
Chang-Claude, J ;
Sobol, H ;
Weber, B ;
Stratton, MR ;
Easton, DF .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (15) :1138-1145
[9]  
Lakhani SR, 1997, LANCET, V349, P1505
[10]   Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast [J].
Lamb, PM ;
Perry, NM ;
Vinnicombe, SJ ;
Wells, CA .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 55 (01) :40-44