Source-constrained retrieval and survival processing

被引:17
|
作者
Nairne, James S. [1 ]
Pandeirada, Josefa N. S. [1 ,2 ]
VanArsdall, Joshua E. [1 ]
Blunt, Janell R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ Aveiro, P-3800 Aveiro, Portugal
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Evolution; Memory; Source-constrained retrieval; Recall; ADAPTIVE MEMORY; ADVANTAGE; INFORMATION; DEPTH;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-014-0456-4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Three experiments investigated the mnemonic effects of source-constrained retrieval in the survival-processing paradigm. Participants were asked to make survival-based or control decisions (pleasantness or moving judgments) about items prior to a source identification test. The source test was followed by a surprise free recall test for all items processed during the experiment, including the new items (foils) presented during the source test. For the source test itself, when asked about the content of prior processing-did you make a survival or a pleasantness decision about this item?-no differences were found between the survival and control conditions. The final free recall data revealed a different pattern: When participants were asked to decide whether an item had been processed previously for survival, that item was subsequently recalled better than when the source query asked about pleasantness or relevance to a moving scenario. This mnemonic boost occurred across-the-board-for items processed during the initial rating phase and for the new items. These data extend the generality of source-constrained retrieval effects and have implications for understanding the proximate mechanisms that underlie the oft-replicated survival-processing advantage in recall and recognition.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adaptive memory: Ancestral priorities and the mnemonic value of survival processing
    Nairne, James S.
    Pandeirada, Josefa N. S.
    COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 61 (01) : 1 - 22
  • [22] Realistic context doesn't amplify the survival processing effect: Lessons learned from Covid-19 scenarios
    Kroneisen, Meike
    Kriechbaumer, Michael
    Kamp, Siri-Maria
    Erdfelder, Edgar
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2022, 222
  • [23] What kind of processing is survival processing? Effects of different types of dual-task load on the survival processing effect
    Kroneisen, Meike
    Rummel, Jan
    Erdfelder, Edgar
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2016, 44 (08) : 1228 - 1243
  • [24] Variations in constrained retrieval
    Michael W. Alban
    Colleen M. Kelley
    Memory & Cognition, 2012, 40 : 681 - 692
  • [25] Survival Processing in a Novel Choice Procedure
    Coverdale, Michelle E.
    Pandeirada, Josefa N. S.
    Nairne, James S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 132 (02) : 195 - 204
  • [26] Survival processing eliminates collaborative inhibition
    Reysen, Matthew B.
    Bliss, Heather
    Baker, Melissa A.
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 71 (06) : 1340 - 1347
  • [27] Adaptive memory: Is survival processing special?
    Nairne, James S.
    Pandeirada, Josefa N. S.
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (03) : 377 - 385
  • [28] How can I use it? The role of functional fixedness in the survival-processing paradigm
    Kroneisen, Meike
    Kriechbaumer, Michael
    Kamp, Siri-Maria
    Erdfelder, Edgar
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2021, 28 (01) : 324 - 332
  • [29] Can Survival Processing Enhance Story Memory? Testing the Generalizability of the Adaptive Memory Framework
    Seamon, John G.
    Bohn, Justin M.
    Coddington, Inslee E.
    Ebling, Maritza C.
    Grund, Ethan M.
    Haring, Catherine T.
    Jang, Sue-Jung
    Kim, Daniel
    Liong, Christopher
    Paley, Frances M.
    Pang, Luke K.
    Siddique, Ashik H.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2012, 38 (04) : 1045 - 1056
  • [30] Adaptive Memory: Survival Processing Increases Both True and False Memory in Adults and Children
    Otgaar, Henry
    Smeets, Tom
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2010, 36 (04) : 1010 - 1016