The coadaptation theory for genomic imprinting

被引:7
作者
O'Brien, Eleanor K. [1 ,2 ]
Wolf, Jason B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Milner Ctr Evolut, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bath, Dept Biol & Biochem, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Adaptive coordination; genomic imprinting; kin selection; social effects; OFFSPRING COADAPTATION; EVOLUTION; SELECTION; MODEL; GENE; KIN; COOPERATION; FITNESS; KINSHIP;
D O I
10.1002/evl3.5
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Imprinted genes are peculiar in that expression of the two copies differs depending on whether the copy was maternally or paternally inherited. The discovery of this striking pattern of gene expression inspired myriad evolutionary theories, the most successful of which identify scenarios that create an asymmetry between the maternally and paternally inherited gene copies that favors silencing of one of the copies. Most notably, imprinting can evolve when gene dosage affects kin interactions (typically involving conflict) or when silencing enhances coadaptation by coordinating traits expressed by interacting kin. Although we have a well-established theory for the former process (the "Kinship Theory"), the coadaptation process has only been explored for the specific case of interactions between mothers and offspring. Here, we fill this critical gap in our understanding by developing a general "Coadaptation Theory" that explains how imprinting can evolve to coordinate interactions between all types of relatives. Using a simple model in which fitness of an individual is determined by an interaction between its own phenotype (and hence genotype) and that of its social partner(s), we find that when the relatedness of interactants differs through their maternally versus paternally inherited gene copies, then selection favors expression of the allele through which relatedness is higher. The predictions of this Coadaptation Theory potentially apply whenever a gene underlies traits that mediate the outcome of conspecific interactions, regardless of their mechanism or the type of organism, and therefore provide a potential explanation for enigmatic patterns of imprinting, including those underlying adult traits. By providing simple testable predictions that often directly contrast with those derived from alternative theories, our model should play an important role in consolidating our understanding of the evolution of imprinting across genes and species, which will ultimately provide crucial insights into imprinted gene function and dysfunction.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 59
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genomic imprinting and the units of adaptation
    A Gardner
    Heredity, 2014, 113 : 104 - 111
  • [22] Do social insects support Haig's kin theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting?
    Pegoraro, Mirko
    Marshall, Hollie
    Lonsdale, Zoe N.
    Mallon, Eamonn B.
    EPIGENETICS, 2017, 12 (09) : 725 - 742
  • [23] In Brief: Genomic imprinting and imprinting diseases
    Horsthemke, Bernhard
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2014, 232 (05) : 485 - 487
  • [24] Mechanisms and evolution of genomic imprinting in plants
    Koehler, C.
    Weinhofer-Molisch, I.
    HEREDITY, 2010, 105 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [25] Genomic Imprinting in Drosophila has properties of both mammalian and insect imprinting
    Anaka, Matthew
    Lynn, Audra
    McGinn, Patrick
    Lloyd, Vett K.
    DEVELOPMENT GENES AND EVOLUTION, 2009, 219 (02) : 59 - 66
  • [26] Gene interactions in the evolution of genomic imprinting
    Wolf, J. B.
    Brandvain, Y.
    HEREDITY, 2014, 113 (02) : 129 - 137
  • [27] Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting
    O'Brien, Eleanor K.
    Wolf, Jason B.
    GENETICS, 2019, 211 (01) : 75 - 88
  • [28] Effects of genomic imprinting on quantitative traits
    Spencer, Hamish G.
    GENETICA, 2009, 136 (02) : 285 - 293
  • [29] Mechanisms and evolution of genomic imprinting in plants
    C Köhler
    I Weinhofer-Molisch
    Heredity, 2010, 105 : 57 - 63
  • [30] Evolution and function of genomic imprinting in plants
    Rodrigues, Jessica A.
    Zilberman, Daniel
    GENES & DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 29 (24) : 2517 - 2531