Smart home technologies in Europe: A critical review of concepts, benefits, risks and policies

被引:220
作者
Sovacool, Benjamin K. [1 ,2 ]
Del Rio, Dylan D. Furszyfer [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sch Business, SPRU, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Business Dev & Technol, Ctr Energy Technol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Environm Policy, London, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会; 英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Smart homes; Smart home technologies; Smart meters; Energy and buildings; Energy feedback; Smart grids; Digital society; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ADOPTION; USERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2019.109663
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Smart home technologies refer to devices that provide some degree of digitally connected, automated, or enhanced services to building occupants. Smart homes have become central in recent technology and policy discussions about energy efficiency, climate change, and the sustainability of buildings. Nevertheless, do they truly promote sustainability goals? In addition, what sorts of benefits, risks, and policies do they entail? Based on an extensive original dataset involving expert interviews, site visits to retailers, and a comprehensive review of the literature, this study critically examines the promise and peril of smart home technologies. Drawing on original data collected in the United Kingdom, which has access to European markets, the study first examines definitions of smart homes before offering a new classification involving 13 categories of smart technology covering 267 specific options commercially available from 113 companies. It situates these different technology classes alongside six degrees or levels of smartness, from the basic or traditional home to the fully automated and sentient home. It then elaborates on the 13 distinct benefits smart homes may offer alongside potential 17 risks and barriers, before introducing seven policy recommendations from the material. It lastly suggests three areas of future research on the demographics and behavior of actual smart home adopters, rethinking the duality of "control," and looking beyond "homes" towards socio-technical systems, practices, and justice.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 72 条
[61]   Ordering theories: Typologies and conceptual frameworks for sociotechnical change [J].
Sovacool, Benjamin K. ;
Hess, David J. .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 2017, 47 (05) :703-750
[62]  
Steward B., 2000, British Journal of Occupational Therapy, V63, P105, DOI DOI 10.1177/0308022600063003
[63]   Convenience and energy consumption in the smart home of the future: Industry visions from Australia and beyond [J].
Strengers, Yolande ;
Nicholls, Larissa .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 32 :86-93
[64]  
Strengers Yolande., 2013, Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia?
[65]   Smart home technologies in everyday life: do they address key energy challenges in households? [J].
Tirado Herrero, Sergio ;
Nicholls, Larissa ;
Strengers, Yolande .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 31 :65-70
[66]  
Toby P, 2017, A report by the Behavioural Insights Team.
[67]  
Vidal J., 2017, Tsunami of data could consume one fifth of global electricity by 2025
[68]  
Wall S, 2013, USABILITY TESTING SM
[69]   Assessing behavioural change with agent-based life cycle assessment:Application to smart homes [J].
Walzberg, Julien ;
Dandres, Thomas ;
Merveille, Nicolas ;
Cheriet, Mohamed ;
Samson, Mean .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 111 :365-376
[70]   How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system [J].
Watson, Matt .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2012, 24 :488-496