Physical and hybrid methods comparison for the day ahead PV output power forecast

被引:164
作者
Ogliari, Emanuele [1 ]
Dolara, Alberto [1 ]
Manzolini, Giampaolo [1 ]
Leva, Sonia [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Energia, Via Lambruschini 4, I-20156 Milan, Italy
关键词
PV forecast power production; Artificial neural network; PV equivalent electrical circuit; NMAE; SolarTech(lab); ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; SOLAR-RADIATION; PREDICTION; MODEL; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2017.05.063
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An accurate forecast of the exploitable energy from Renewable Energy Sources, provided 24 h in advance, is becoming more and more important in the context of the smart grids, both for their stability issues and the reliability of the bidding markets. This work presents a comparison of the PV output power day-ahead forecasts performed by deterministic and stochastic models aiming to find out the best performance conditions. In particular, we have compared the results of two deterministic models, based on three and five parameters electric equivalent circuit, and a hybrid method based on artificial neural network. The forecasts are evaluated against real data measured for one year in an existing PV plant located at SolarTech(lab) in Milan, Italy. In general, there is no significant difference between the two deterministic models, being the three-parameter approach slightly more accurate (NMAE three-parameter 8.5% vs. NMAE five-parameter 9.0%). The artificial neural network, combined with clear sky solar radiation, generally achieves the best forecasting results (NMAE 5.6%) and only few days of training are necessary to provide accurate forecasts. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 21
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, INT C REN EN POW QUA
[2]  
Antonanzas J., 2016, SOL ENERGY
[3]   What Size Net Gives Valid Generalization? [J].
Baum, Eric B. ;
Haussler, David .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1989, 1 (01) :151-160
[4]  
Beale M.H., NEURAL NETWORK TOOLB
[5]   Artificial neural network modelling and experimental verification of the operating current of mono-crystalline photovoltaic modules [J].
Celik, Ali Naci .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2011, 85 (10) :2507-2517
[6]   Artificial Intelligence techniques: An introduction to their use for modelling environmental systems [J].
Chen, Serena H. ;
Jakeman, Anthony J. ;
Norton, John P. .
MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2008, 78 (2-3) :379-400
[7]   Parameter extraction for dynamic PV thermal model using particle swarm optimisation [J].
Chopde, Abhay ;
Magare, Dhiraj ;
Patil, Mahesh ;
Gupta, Rajesh ;
Sastry, O. S. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 100 :508-517
[8]   Improvement and validation of a model for photovoltaic array performance [J].
De Soto, W ;
Klein, SA ;
Beckman, WA .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2006, 80 (01) :78-88
[9]  
Dolara A., 2016, EEEIC 2016 INT C ENV
[10]   Comparison of different physical models for PV power output prediction [J].
Dolara, Alberto ;
Leva, Sonia ;
Manzolini, Giampaolo .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2015, 119 :83-99