Cone beam computed tomography based image guidance and quality assessment of prostate cancer for magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy in the pelvis

被引:4
|
作者
Edmund, Jens M. [1 ,2 ]
Andreasen, Daniel [3 ]
Van Leemput, Koen [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Gentofte & Herlev Hosp, Dept Oncol, Radiotherapy Res Unit, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Niels Bohr Inst, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Hlth Technol, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Martinos Ctr Biomed Imaging, Boston, MA 02114 USA
来源
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 18卷
关键词
MRI-only RT; IGRT; Synthetic CT; Pseudo CT; Magnetic resonance imaging; Radiotherapy; Cone beam CT; SYNTHETIC CT GENERATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; NEURAL-NETWORK; MRI SEQUENCES; PSEUDO-CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2021.05.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) based on magentic resonance imaging (MRI) only is currently used clinically in the pelvis. A synthetic computed tomography (sCT) is needed for dose planning. Here, we investigate the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) based MRI-only image guided RT (IGRT) and sCT image quality. Materials and methods: CT, MRI and CBCT scans of ten prostate cancer patients were included. The MRI was converted to a sCT using a multi-atlas approach. The sCT, CT and MR images were auto-matched with the CBCT on the bony anatomy. Paired sCT-CT and sCT-CBCT data were created. CT numbers were converted to relative electron (RED) and mass densities (DES) using a standard calibration curve for the CT and sCT. For the CBCT RED/DES conversion, a phantom and paired CT-CBCT population based calibration curve was used. For the latter, the CBCT numbers were averaged in 100 HU bins and the known RED/DES of the CT were assigned. The paired sCT-CT and sCT-CBCT data were averaged in bins of 10 HU or 0.01 RED/DES. The median absolute error (MeAE) between the sCT-CT and sCT-CBCT bins was calculated. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were carried out for the IGRT and MeAE study. Results: The mean sCT or MR IGRT difference from CT was <= 2 mm but significant differences were observed. A CBCT HU or phantom-based RED/DES MeAE did not estimate the sCT quality similar to a CT based MeAE but the CBCT population-based RED/DES MeAE did. Conclusions: MRI-only CBCT-based IGRT seems feasible but caution is advised. A MeAE around 0.1 DES could call for sCT quality inspection.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 60
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Validation of cone-beam computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the porcine spine: a comparative study with multidetector computed tomography and anatomical specimens
    Costa de Freitas, Ricardo Miguel
    Andrade, Celi Santos
    Mendes Pereira Caldas, Jose Guilherme
    Kanas, Alexandre Fligelman
    Cabral, Richard Halti
    Tsunemi, Miriam Harumi
    Cervantes Rodriguez, Hernan Joel
    Rabbani, Said Rahnamaye
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (05) : 992 - 999
  • [42] Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer with cone beam CT: dosimetric effects of imaging frequency and PTV margin
    Ariyaratne, Hemal
    Chesham, Hayley
    Pettingell, John
    Alonzi, Roberto
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 121 (01) : 103 - 108
  • [43] Feasibility of MRI-based reference images for image-guided radiotherapy of the pelvis with either cone-beam computed tomography or planar localization images
    Korhonen, Juha
    Kapanen, Mika
    Sonke, Jan-Jakob
    Wee, Leonard
    Salli, Eero
    Keyrilainen, Jani
    Seppala, Tiina
    Tenhunen, Mikko
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2015, 54 (06) : 889 - U190
  • [44] An Inter-observer Study to Determine Radiotherapy Planning Target Volumes for Recurrent Gynaecological Cancer Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging Only With Computed Tomography-Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Bernstein, D.
    Taylor, A.
    Nill, S.
    Imseeh, G.
    Kothari, G.
    Llewelyn, M.
    De Paepe, K. N.
    Rockall, A.
    Shiarli, A-M
    Oelfke, U.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 33 (05) : 307 - 313
  • [45] A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging
    De Cock, Jens
    Zanca, Federica
    Canning, John
    Pauwels, Ruben
    Hermans, Robert
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (07) : 1891 - 1900
  • [46] Nano X Image Guidance in radiation therapy: feasibility study protocol for cone beam computed tomography imaging with gravity-induced motion
    Debrot, Emily
    Liu, Paul
    Gardner, Mark
    Heng, Soo Min
    Chan, Chin Hwa
    Corde, Stephanie
    Downes, Simon
    Jackson, Michael
    Keall, Paul
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [47] The relationship between the articular disc in magnetic resonance imaging and the condyle in cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective study
    Chen, Benyi
    Li, Chuanjie
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 125 (05)
  • [48] A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging
    Jens De Cock
    Federica Zanca
    John Canning
    Ruben Pauwels
    Robert Hermans
    European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 1891 - 1900
  • [49] Geometric Reproducibility of Three-Dimensional Oral Implant Planning Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
    Schwindling, Franz Sebastian
    Boehm, Sophia
    Herpel, Christopher
    Kronsteiner, Dorothea
    Vogel, Lorenz
    Juerchott, Alexander
    Heiland, Sabine
    Bendszus, Martin
    Rammelsberg, Peter
    Hilgenfeld, Tim
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (23)
  • [50] Clinical Workflow of Cone Beam Computer Tomography-Based Daily Online Adaptive Radiotherapy with Offline Magnetic Resonance Guidance: The Modular Adaptive Radiotherapy System (MARS)
    Kim, Ji-Young
    Tawk, Bouchra
    Knoll, Maximilian
    Hoegen-Sassmannshausen, Philipp
    Liermann, Jakob
    Huber, Peter E.
    Lifferth, Mona
    Lang, Clemens
    Haering, Peter
    Gnirs, Regula
    Jaekel, Oliver
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Debus, Juergen
    Hoerner-Rieber, Juliane
    Weykamp, Fabian
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (06)