European psychometric validation of the CONTILIFE®:: A Quality of Life questionnaire for urinary incontinence

被引:77
作者
Amarenco, G
Arnould, B
Carita, P
Haab, F
Labat, JJ
Richard, F
机构
[1] MAPI Values, F-69003 Lyon, France
[2] Hop Rothschild, Serv Reeducat Neurol & Explorat Perineales, F-75571 Paris 12, France
[3] Sanofi Synthelabo, F-92225 Bagneux, France
[4] Hop Tenon, Serv Urol, F-75970 Paris 20, France
[5] Ctr Med Mauvoisins, Serv Reeducat Fonctionnelle, F-44200 Nantes, France
[6] Grp Hosp Pitie Salpetriere, Serv Urol, F-75651 Paris 13, France
关键词
quality of life (QoL); urinary incontinence (UI); psychometrics; France; Belgium; Germany; the Netherlands; Denmark; United Kingdom;
D O I
10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00054-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To validate 5 language versions (French, Dutch, German, English and Danish) of CONTILIFE(R), a urinary incontinence-specific measure of Quality of Life (QoL). Methods: CONTILIFE(R) was administered to Belgian, Danish, English, French, German, and Dutch women with genuine stress incontinence. The internal consistency, the construct and clinical validity, and the responsiveness to change over time were assessed using standardised procedures. Results: 505 women filled in the CONTILIFE(R) at baseline. Quality of completion was good. The mean number of missing data varied between 0.33 (1.17%) and 0.94 (3.36%) according to the country. Internal consistency was good for all dimensions except for the Effort Activities dimension. Construct validity was good for the Danish, French and pooled sample, and acceptable for English, German and Dutch samples. The distribution of QoL scores differed according to the number of urinary leaks (p < 0.007). 477 women completed the questionnaire twice with a 28-day interval. Responsiveness to clinical improvement was good (\ES\ ≥ 0.50) except for the Sexuality and Well-Being dimensions. Conclusion: In this international European study, CONTILIFE(R) matched the psychometric requirements to be used as a valid, reliable, and sensitive measure of the QoL of the patients. The Daily Activities, Effort Activities, Self-Image and Emotional Consequences dimensions are the most relevant and valid dimensions for purposes of comparison. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All fights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 404
页数:14
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Acquadro C, 1996, Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials, P575
  • [2] Campbell D. T., 1959, PSYCHOL BULL, V86, P85
  • [3] CONWAY K, 1999, VALUE HEALTH, V3, P203
  • [4] Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
  • [5] QUALITY-OF-LIFE MEASURES IN HEALTH-CARE .1. APPLICATIONS AND ISSUES IN ASSESSMENT
    FITZPATRICK, R
    FLETCHER, A
    GORE, S
    JONES, D
    SPIEGELHALTER, D
    COX, D
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6861) : 1074 - 1077
  • [6] GIROD I, 1999, QUAL LIFE RES, V7, P658
  • [7] HAYS RD, 1995, PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUAT
  • [8] EFFECT SIZES FOR INTERPRETING CHANGES IN HEALTH-STATUS
    KAZIS, LE
    ANDERSON, JJ
    MEENAN, RF
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (03) : S178 - S189
  • [9] A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women
    Kelleher, CJ
    Cardozo, LD
    Khullar, V
    Salvatore, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (12): : 1374 - 1379
  • [10] Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: Development of scientific review criteria
    Lohr, KN
    Aaronson, NK
    Alonso, J
    Burnam, MA
    Patrick, DL
    Perrin, EB
    Roberts, JS
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1996, 18 (05) : 979 - 992