Validation, Replication, and Sensitivity Testing of Heckman-Type Selection Models to Adjust Estimates of HIV Prevalence

被引:29
作者
Clark, Samuel J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Houle, Brian [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Sociol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Inst Behav Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, MRC Wits Rural Publ Hlth & Hlth Transit Res Unit, Johannesburg, South Africa
[4] Australian Natl Univ, Australian Demog & Social Res Inst, Canberra, ACT, Australia
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 11期
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
BIAS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0112563
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A recent study using Heckman-type selection models to adjust for non-response in the Zambia 2007 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) found a large correction in HIV prevalence for males. We aim to validate this finding, replicate the adjustment approach in other DHSs, apply the adjustment approach in an external empirical context, and assess the robustness of the technique to different adjustment approaches. We used 6 DHSs, and an HIV prevalence study from rural South Africa to validate and replicate the adjustment approach. We also developed an alternative, systematic model of selection processes and applied it to all surveys. We decomposed corrections from both approaches into rate change and age-structure change components. We are able to reproduce the adjustment approach for the 2007 Zambia DHS and derive results comparable with the original findings. We are able to replicate applying the approach in several other DHSs. The approach also yields reasonable adjustments for a survey in rural South Africa. The technique is relatively robust to how the adjustment approach is specified. The Heckman selection model is a useful tool for assessing the possibility and extent of selection bias in HIV prevalence estimates from sample surveys.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ZIMB DEM HLTH SURV 2
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ZAMB DEM HLTH SURV 2
[3]  
[Anonymous], LES DEM HLTH SURV 20
[4]   Correcting HIV Prevalence Estimates for Survey Nonparticipation Using Heckman-type Selection Models [J].
Baernighausen, Till ;
Bor, Jacob ;
Wandira-Kazibwe, Speciosa ;
Canning, David .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 22 (01) :27-35
[5]   Is the magic still there? The use of the Heckman two-step correction for selection bias in criminology [J].
Bushway, Shawn ;
Johnson, Brian D. ;
Slocum, Lee Ann .
JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE CRIMINOLOGY, 2007, 23 (02) :151-178
[6]   SELECTION BIAS IN LINEAR-REGRESSION, LOGIT AND PROBIT MODELS [J].
DUBIN, JA ;
RIVERS, D .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1989, 18 (2-3) :360-390
[7]   Underestimation of HIV prevalence in surveys when some people already know their status, and ways to reduce the bias [J].
Floyd, Sian ;
Molesworth, Anna ;
Dube, Albert ;
Crampin, Amelia C. ;
Houben, Rein ;
Chihana, Menard ;
Price, Alison ;
Kayuni, Ndoliwe ;
Saul, Jacqueline ;
French, Neil ;
Glynn, Judith R. .
AIDS, 2013, 27 (02) :233-242
[8]   Adjusting for Selection Effects in Epidemiologic Studies Why Sensitivity Analysis is the Only "Solution" [J].
Geneletti, Sara ;
Mason, Alexina ;
Best, Nicky .
EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 22 (01) :36-39
[9]  
Gomez-Olive FX, 2013, AIDS CARE, P1
[10]   SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS AS A SPECIFICATION ERROR [J].
HECKMAN, JJ .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (01) :153-161