THE ROMAN LAW RULES OF INTERPRETATION IN THE MEDIEVAL TOWN LAW

被引:0
|
作者
Malarova, Lenka Smidova [1 ]
Virdzekova, Alica [1 ]
机构
[1] Masaryk Univ, Fac Law, Brno, Czech Republic
来源
SGEM 2015: POLITICAL SCIENCES, LAW, FINANCE, ECONOMICS AND TOURISM, VOL I: LAW, POLITICAL SCIENCES | 2015年
关键词
Roman law; rules of interpretation; Digest; Middle Ages; Czech lands; the Manual of Town Law;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Reception of Roman law, which, in the High Middle Ages hit the legal environment of almost the entire Europe, had also imminently influenced the development of law in the Czech lands. Aside from Canon law, which often used Roman law terms in documents, the issue of reception of Roman law in the Czech lands was closely connected mainly with the medieval cities which, thanks to their market-economy nature, were very close to the economic and social structure of Ancient Rome. There were many Czech towns that followed Roman law as a secondary source of law and the Moravian Royal city of Brno was one of them. In 1380s, a general manual on law was written in the Brno's town office. The manual was intended for the needs of the Czech towns and villages and its title was Manipulus vel directorium iuris civilis (Manual of Town Law). It was written by the town's public notary John of Gelnhausen, who had practice in Brno. Writing this manuscript, the author drew inspiration from the Roman law codification Corpus iuris civilis, particularly from the 16th and 17th title of the fiftieth book of Digest, which outlines rules of interpretation and legal definitions. The Gelnhausen's work is unique, as no other legal book of that period which had been written in the Czech lands contained such a vast corpus of interpretation rules and principles. Thus, the goal of this article is to present an analysis of some of the rules of interpretation from the Manual of Town Law which John of Gelnhausen borrowed from Digest. An emphasis will be put especially on the rules of interpretation concerning juridical acts. The authors of this paper are going to focus not only on the essence of these rules, but they will also try to outline the importance of these rules for the period legal practice.
引用
收藏
页码:813 / 818
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THEMATIC TOURIST GUIDE OF ROMAN LAW
    Malanovicz, Aline Vieira
    PODIUM-SPORT LEISURE AND TOURISM REVIEW, 2022, 11 (02): : 258 - 292
  • [32] The Supplementary Oath in Medieval Canon Law
    Vladar, Vojtech
    STUDIA THEOLOGICA-CZECH REPUBLIC, 2021, 23 (01): : 71 - 91
  • [33] The artifices of truth in medieval common law
    Thomas, Y
    HOMME, 2005, (175-76): : 113 - 130
  • [34] TRACES OF FELDGEMEINSCHAFT (FIELD ALLIANCE) IN ROMAN EGYPT LAW SYSTEM AND IN JEWISH LAW
    Korzakova, Hava Brocha
    PHILOLOGIA CLASSICA, 2016, 11 (02): : 244 - 252
  • [35] A Corpus Approach to Roman Law Based on Justinian's Digest
    Ribary, Marton
    McGillivray, Barbara
    INFORMATICS-BASEL, 2020, 7 (04):
  • [36] The principle of inviolability of property. Roman law and its reception in Argentinian law
    Veronica Sconda, Mariana
    REVISTA DE DERECHO PRIVADO, 2013, (24) : 43 - 77
  • [37] SOME CONSIDERATIONS ABOUT THE FIGURE OF THE "CURATOR VENTRIS" IN ROMAN LAW AND IN THE CURRENT LAW
    Bueno Delgado, Juan Antonio
    REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO ROMANO, 2018, (31):
  • [38] Transforming Greek practice into Roman law: manumissions in Roman Macedonia
    Youni, Maria S.
    TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR RECHTSGESCHIEDENIS-REVUE D HISTOIRE DU DROIT-THE LEGAL HISTORY REVIEW, 2010, 78 (3-4): : 311 - 340
  • [39] Lessons from Roman law: EU law in England and Wales after Brexit
    Cotter, John
    Dewhurst, Elaine
    LAW TEACHER, 2019, 53 (02) : 173 - 188
  • [40] RECEIVING ROMAN LAW IN GLAGOLITHICAL SCRIPT: NOTARIAL PROTOCOL OF THE 1621 ARBITRATION OF MOSCENICE BASED ON ROMAN LAW (DISPUTE RESOLUTION)
    Milotic, Ivan
    ZBORNIK PRAVNOG FAKULTETA SVEUCILISTA U RIJECI, 2020, 41 (03): : 679 - 692