Phenomapping of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using machine learning-based unsupervised cluster analysis

被引:183
|
作者
Segar, Matthew W. [1 ]
Patel, Kershaw V. [1 ]
Ayers, Colby [1 ]
Basit, Mujeeb [1 ]
Tang, W. H. Wilson [2 ]
Willett, Duwayne [1 ]
Berry, Jarett [1 ]
Grodin, Justin L. [1 ]
Pandey, Ambarish [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Cardiovasc Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Phenomapping; Machine learning; Outcomes; SPIRONOLACTONE; PHENOTYPE; RISK; MORTALITY; TOPCAT;
D O I
10.1002/ejhf.1621
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim To identify distinct phenotypic subgroups in a highly-dimensional, mixed-data cohort of individuals with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) using unsupervised clustering analysis. Methods and results The study included all Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) participants from the Americas (n = 1767). In the subset of participants with available echocardiographic data (derivation cohort, n = 654), we characterized three mutually exclusive phenogroups of HFpEF participants using penalized finite mixture model-based clustering analysis on 61 mixed-data phenotypic variables. Phenogroup 1 had higher burden of co-morbidities, natriuretic peptides, and abnormalities in left ventricular structure and function; phenogroup 2 had lower prevalence of cardiovascular and non-cardiac co-morbidities but higher burden of diastolic dysfunction; and phenogroup 3 had lower natriuretic peptide levels, intermediate co-morbidity burden, and the most favourable diastolic function profile. In adjusted Cox models, participants in phenogroup 1 (vs. phenogroup 3) had significantly higher risk for all adverse clinical events including the primary composite endpoint, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization. Phenogroup 2 (vs. phenogroup 3) was significantly associated with higher risk of HF hospitalization but a lower risk of atherosclerotic event (myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death), and comparable risk of mortality. Similar patterns of association were also observed in the non-echocardiographic TOPCAT cohort (internal validation cohort, n = 1113) and an external cohort of patients with HFpEF [Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (RELAX) trial cohort, n = 198], with the highest risk of adverse outcome noted in phenogroup 1 participants. Conclusions Machine learning-based cluster analysis can identify phenogroups of patients with HFpEF with distinct clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 158
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] HEART FAILURE IN PATIENTS WITH PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION - PUMPING HEART FAILURE?
    Sokolov, A. A.
    Martsinkevich, G., I
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2018, 58 (06) : 79 - 84
  • [32] Prognosis for Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Is It the Same As Low Ejection Fraction?
    Doughty, Robert Neil
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2011, 64 (08): : 646 - 648
  • [33] Trends in pharmacotherapy utilization among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Riaz, Munaza
    Smith, Steven M.
    Dietrich, Eric A.
    Winchester, David E.
    Guo, Jingchuan
    Park, Haesuk
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL PLUS: CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 26
  • [34] Epidemiology and Management of Patients With Kidney Disease and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Tuttle, Marcelle L.
    Fang, James C.
    Sarnak, Mark J.
    McCallum, Wendy
    SEMINARS IN NEPHROLOGY, 2024, 44 (02)
  • [35] Spironolactone in Patients With Heart Failure, Preserved Ejection Fraction, and Worsening Renal Function
    Beldhuis, Iris E.
    Myhre, Peder L.
    Bristow, Michael
    Claggett, Brian
    Damman, Kevin
    Fang, James C.
    Fleg, Jerome L.
    McKinlay, Sonja
    Lewis, Eldrin F.
    O'Meara, Eileen
    Pitt, Bertram
    Shah, Sanjiv J.
    Vardeny, Orly
    Voors, Adriaan A.
    Pfeffer, Marc A.
    Solomon, Scott D.
    Desai, Akshay S.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 77 (09) : 1211 - 1221
  • [36] Extracellular Volume Fraction for Characterization of Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction
    Rommel, Karl-Philipp
    von Roeder, Maximilian
    Latuscynski, Konrad
    Oberueck, Christian
    Blazek, Stephan
    Fengler, Karl
    Besler, Christian
    Sandri, Marcus
    Luecke, Christian
    Gutberlet, Matthias
    Linke, Axel
    Schuler, Gerhard
    Lurz, Philipp
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (15) : 1815 - 1825
  • [37] Predictors of activities of daily living at discharge in elderly patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Kitamura, Masahiro
    Izawa, Kazuhiro P.
    Ishihara, Kodai
    Yaekura, Masakazu
    Nagashima, Hitomi
    Yoshizawa, Takashi
    Okamoto, Nobuhiro
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2021, 36 (04) : 509 - 517
  • [38] Prevalence and prognosis of frailty in older patients with stage B heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
    Meng, Chen
    Chai, Ke
    Li, Ying-Ying
    Luo, Yao
    Wang, Hua
    Yang, Jie-Fu
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2023, 10 (02): : 1133 - 1143
  • [39] Vive les Differences!-A case for optimism in the treatment of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction?
    Law, Jonathan P.
    Pickup, Luke
    Townend, Jonathan N.
    Ferro, Charles J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 73 (06)
  • [40] Blockade of the neurohormonal systems in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A contemporary meta-analysis
    Gallo, Giovanna
    Tocci, Giuliano
    Fogacci, Federica
    Battistoni, Allegra
    Rubattu, Speranza
    Volpe, Massimo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 316 : 172 - 179