Social factors predicting postpartum choice of Norplant among African-American and non-Hispanic white adolescents

被引:5
作者
Mears, CJ
Hediger, ML
Martin, SS
Scholl, TO
Kramer, JP
机构
[1] MED CTR DELAWARE,DEPT PEDIAT,DIV ADOLESCENT MED,NEWARK,DE
[2] UNIV MED & DENT NEW JERSEY,SCH OSTEOPATH MED,DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL,STRATFORD,NJ 08084
[3] UNIV DELAWARE,NEWARK,DE
关键词
adolescent; contraception; Norplant; Medicaid; peer influence; ethnic differences;
D O I
10.1016/S1054-139X(97)00001-3
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study was designed to determine the factors associated with Norplant choice for postpartum teens. Methods: A total of 151 teenagers, ages 12-20 years, who delivered at the Medical Center of Delaware from July to December 1995 were offered insertion of Norplant within 48 h postpartum. A structured interview was conducted in the postpartum period after nondirective counseling sessions including a physical demonstration using anatomical models of various contraceptive methods. Student's t-tests, chi-square, and multivariate analyses were used. Results: Eighty-six teenagers were African-American (mean age = 17.3 +/- 1.9 years) and 65 non-Hispanic white (NHW) (mean age = 18.3 +/- 1.5 years). The NHW teenagers were older (p < 0.001); the African-American teenagers were more likely to have Medicaid (49% vs. 14%; p < 0.001) and to have one or more friends who use Norplant (62% vs. 34%; p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, NHW teenagers were more likely to choose Norplant if they had discussed their choice with a parent or guardian [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 14.6, 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.12-100.57]; had Medicaid funding (AOR = 12.1; 95% (CI), 10.6-91.34); and had any friends who used Norplant (AOR = 6.3; 95% (CI), 1.38-28.40), However, for African-American teenagers, the strongest predictor for choice of Norplant was number of prior children delivered. After two deliveries, there was a better than fourfold likelihood (AOR = 4.8; 95% (CI), 1.47-15.94) that African-American teenagers would choose Norplant. For the African-American teenagers, parental discussion, Medicaid status, and friends' use of Norplant were not as important as family size, but far greater percentages of the African-American teenagers had access to Medicaid funding and peers who used Norplant. Conclusions: NHW and African-American teenagers choose Norplant for different reasons. Lack of funding may have been a barrier to choosing Norplant. Discussions with parents and friends have a positive influence on choosing Norplant for NHW teenagers. African-American teenagers were more likely than NHW to have Medicaid coverage, and more frequently choose Norplant if the current birth was their third child. (C) Society for Adolescent Medicine, 1997.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 171
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   THE USE OF NORPLANT AND DEPO-PROVERA IN ADOLESCENTS [J].
AMMERMAN, SD .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 1995, 16 (05) :343-346
[2]  
ASHRAF T, 1994, J REPROD MED, V39, P791
[3]   ADOLESCENT GIRLS ATTITUDES TOWARD CONTRACEPTIVE SUBDERMAL IMPLANTS [J].
DABROW, SM ;
MERRICK, CL ;
CONLON, M .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 1995, 16 (05) :360-366
[4]   ADOLESCENT PREGNANCY IN THE UNITED-STATES - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICIAN AND RESEARCH NEEDS [J].
FIELDING, JE ;
WILLIAMS, CA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1991, 7 (01) :47-52
[5]   ADOLESCENT USE OF NORPLANT IMPLANTS - CLINIC SERVICES, POLICIES AND BARRIERS TO USE [J].
FROST, JJ ;
KAESER, L .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 1995, 16 (05) :367-372
[6]   CONTRACEPTIVE IMPLANT USE AMONG INNER-CITY TEENS [J].
GLANTZ, S ;
SCHAFF, E ;
CAMPBELLHEIDER, N ;
GLANTZ, JC ;
BARTLETT, M .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 1995, 16 (05) :389-395
[7]  
KLEINBAUM DG, 1988, APPLIED REGRESSION A
[8]   THE USE OF LEVONORGESTREL IMPLANTS (NORPLANT) FOR CONTRACEPTION IN ADOLESCENT MOTHERS [J].
POLANECZKY, M ;
SLAP, G ;
FORKE, C ;
RAPPAPORT, A ;
SONDHEIMER, S .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (18) :1201-1206
[9]  
*SAS I INC, 1990, SAS STAT US GUID VER, V1
[10]  
SAS Institute Inc, 1990, SAS/STAT User's Guide, V2