Tie trees generated by distance methods of phylogenetic reconstruction

被引:22
作者
Takezaki, N
机构
[1] Natl Inst Genet, Shizuoka 411, Japan
[2] Penn State Univ, Inst Mol Evolutionary Genet, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Biol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
tie trees; phylogenetic analysis; distance methods; neighbor-joining method; UPGMA;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025976
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In examining genetic data in recent publications, Backeljau et al, showed cases in which two or more different trees (tie trees) were constructed from a single data set for the neighbor-joining (NJ) method and the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA). However, it is still unclear how often and under what conditions tie trees are generated. Therefore, I examined these problems by computer simulation. Examination of cases in which tie trees occur shows that tie trees can appear when no substitutions occur along some interior branch(es) on a tree. However, even when some substitutions occur along interior branches, tie trees can appear by chance if parallel or backward substitutions occur at some sites. The simulation results showed that tie trees occur relatively frequently for sequences with low divergence levels or with small numbers of sites. For such data, UPGMA sometimes produced tie trees quite frequently, whereas tie trees for the NJ method were generally rare. In the simulation, bootstrap values for clusters (tie clusters) that differed among tie trees were mostly low (<60%). With a small probability, relatively high bootstrap values (at most 70%-80%) appeared for tie clusters. The bias of the bootstrap values caused by an input order of sequences can be avoided if one of the different paths in the cycles of making an NJ or UPGMA tree is chosen at random in each bootstrap replication.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 737
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Multiple UPGMA and neighbor-joining trees and the performance of some computer packages [J].
Backeljau, T ;
DeBruyn, L ;
DeWolf, H ;
Jordaens, K ;
VanDongen, S ;
Winnepenninckx, B .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1996, 13 (02) :309-313
[2]   On the interpretation of bootstrap trees: Appropriate threshold of clade selection and induced gain [J].
Berry, V ;
Gascuel, O .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1996, 13 (07) :999-1011
[3]   ESTIMATION OF TIME OF DIVERGENCE FROM PHYLOGENETIC STUDIES [J].
CHAKRABORTY, R .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS AND CYTOLOGY, 1977, 19 (02) :217-223
[4]   Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees (vol 93, pg 7085, 1996) [J].
Efron, B ;
Halloran, E ;
Holmes, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (23) :13429-13434
[5]  
FELSENSTEIN J, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P783, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x
[6]  
Felsenstein J, 1995, PHYLIP PHYLOGENY INF
[7]   PROBLEM OF DISCOVERING MOST PARSIMONIOUS TREE [J].
FITCH, WM .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1977, 111 (978) :223-257
[8]   TOWARD DEFINING COURSE OF EVOLUTION - MINIMUM CHANGE FOR A SPECIFIC TREE TOPOLOGY [J].
FITCH, WM .
SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY, 1971, 20 (04) :406-&
[9]  
HEDGES SB, 1992, SCIENCE, V255, P737, DOI 10.1126/science.1738849
[10]  
JUKES T H, 1969, P21