Factors affecting accuracy and precision in ultrasound guided radiotherapy

被引:4
|
作者
Grimwood, Alexander [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thomas, Karen [2 ,4 ]
Kember, Sally [1 ,2 ]
Aldis, Georgina [1 ,2 ]
Lawes, Rebekah [1 ,2 ]
Brigden, Beverley [1 ,2 ]
Francis, Jane [1 ,2 ]
Henegan, Emer [1 ,2 ]
Kerner, Melanie [1 ,2 ]
Delacroix, Louise [1 ,2 ]
Gordon, Alexandra [1 ,2 ]
Tree, Alison [1 ,2 ]
Harris, Emma J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
McNair, Helen A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiotherapy, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Radiotherapy Dept, Inst Canc Res, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[3] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Joint Dept Phys, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[4] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Stat & Comp, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
关键词
Prostate cancer; Inter observer error; Ultrasound; Treatment margins; Image guidance; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER; TRANSPERINEAL ULTRASOUND; RADIATION-THERAPY; MOTION; ONLINE; VERIFICATION; MARKERS; ERRORS; IRRADIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2021.05.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is used clinically for directly assessing prostate motion. Factors affecting accuracy and precision in TPUS motion estimation must be assessed to realise its full potential. Methods and materials: Patients were imaged using volumetric TPUS during the Clarity-Pm trial (NCT02388308). Prostate motion was measured online at patient set-up and offline by experienced observers. Cone beam CT with markers was used as a comparator and observer performance was also quantified. The influence of different clinical factors was examined to establish specific recommendations towards efficacious ultrasound guided radiotherapy. Results: From 330 fractions in 22 patients, offline observer random errors were 1.5 mm, 1.3 mm, 1.9 mm (left-right, superior-inferior, anteroposterior respectively). Errors increased in fractions exhibiting poor image quality to 3.3 mm, 3.3 mm and 6.8 mm. Poor image quality was associated with inconsistent probe placement, large anatomical changes and unfavourable imaging conditions within the patient. Online matching exhibited increased observer errors of: 3.2 mm, 2.9 mm and 4.7 mm. Four patients exhibited large systematic residual errors, of which three had poor quality images. Patient habitus showed no correlation with observer error, residual error, or image quality. Conclusions: TPUS offers the unique potential to directly assess inter- and intra-fraction motion on conventional linacs. Inconsistent image quality, inexperienced operators and the pressures of the clinical environment may degrade precision and accuracy. Experienced operators are essential and cross-centre standards for training and QA should be established that build upon current guidance. Greater use of automation technologies may further minimise uncertainties.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 77
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accuracy of Ultrasound Guided Injections in the Foot and Ankle
    Reach, John S.
    Easley, Mark E.
    Chuckpaiwong, Bavornrit
    Nunley, James A., II
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 30 (03) : 239 - 242
  • [42] ACCURACY OF ADRENAL BIOPSY GUIDED BY ULTRASOUND AND CT
    TIKKAKOSKI, T
    TAAVITSAINEN, M
    PAIVANSALO, M
    LAHDE, S
    APAJASARKKINEN, M
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 1991, 32 (05) : 371 - 374
  • [43] FACTORS AFFECTING THE ACCURACY OF REFERENCE ELECTRODES
    ANSUINI, FJ
    DIMOND, JR
    MATERIALS PERFORMANCE, 1994, 33 (11) : 14 - 17
  • [44] Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Reference Electrodes
    Ansuini, Frank J.
    Dimond, James R.
    MATERIALS PERFORMANCE, 2017, 56 (10) : 30 - 33
  • [45] FACTORS AFFECTING VISUAL INSPECTION ACCURACY
    MEGAW, ED
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 1979, 10 (01) : 27 - 32
  • [46] SITUATIONAL FACTORS AFFECTING FORECAST ACCURACY
    SCHNAARS, SP
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1984, 21 (03) : 290 - 297
  • [47] Factors Affecting Insulin Dosing Accuracy
    Virdi, Naunihal S.
    Mahoney, John J.
    DIABETES, 2012, 61 : A589 - A589
  • [48] Factors Affecting Accuracy in Proton Therapy
    Cheng, C.
    Zhao, L.
    Zhao, Q.
    Moskvin, V.
    Buchsbaum, J.
    Das, I.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3771 - 3771
  • [49] Factors affecting SMD placement accuracy
    Amistar, San Marcos, United States
    Electron Packag Prod, 1 (5pp):
  • [50] Factors affecting the accuracy of TMA measurements
    Foreman, Jonathon
    Kelsey, Mark
    Widmann, Georg
    ASTM Special Technical Publication, (1369): : 181 - 196