Factors affecting accuracy and precision in ultrasound guided radiotherapy

被引:4
|
作者
Grimwood, Alexander [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Thomas, Karen [2 ,4 ]
Kember, Sally [1 ,2 ]
Aldis, Georgina [1 ,2 ]
Lawes, Rebekah [1 ,2 ]
Brigden, Beverley [1 ,2 ]
Francis, Jane [1 ,2 ]
Henegan, Emer [1 ,2 ]
Kerner, Melanie [1 ,2 ]
Delacroix, Louise [1 ,2 ]
Gordon, Alexandra [1 ,2 ]
Tree, Alison [1 ,2 ]
Harris, Emma J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
McNair, Helen A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Radiotherapy, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Radiotherapy Dept, Inst Canc Res, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[3] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Joint Dept Phys, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[4] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Stat & Comp, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
关键词
Prostate cancer; Inter observer error; Ultrasound; Treatment margins; Image guidance; EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY; LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER; TRANSPERINEAL ULTRASOUND; RADIATION-THERAPY; MOTION; ONLINE; VERIFICATION; MARKERS; ERRORS; IRRADIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2021.05.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is used clinically for directly assessing prostate motion. Factors affecting accuracy and precision in TPUS motion estimation must be assessed to realise its full potential. Methods and materials: Patients were imaged using volumetric TPUS during the Clarity-Pm trial (NCT02388308). Prostate motion was measured online at patient set-up and offline by experienced observers. Cone beam CT with markers was used as a comparator and observer performance was also quantified. The influence of different clinical factors was examined to establish specific recommendations towards efficacious ultrasound guided radiotherapy. Results: From 330 fractions in 22 patients, offline observer random errors were 1.5 mm, 1.3 mm, 1.9 mm (left-right, superior-inferior, anteroposterior respectively). Errors increased in fractions exhibiting poor image quality to 3.3 mm, 3.3 mm and 6.8 mm. Poor image quality was associated with inconsistent probe placement, large anatomical changes and unfavourable imaging conditions within the patient. Online matching exhibited increased observer errors of: 3.2 mm, 2.9 mm and 4.7 mm. Four patients exhibited large systematic residual errors, of which three had poor quality images. Patient habitus showed no correlation with observer error, residual error, or image quality. Conclusions: TPUS offers the unique potential to directly assess inter- and intra-fraction motion on conventional linacs. Inconsistent image quality, inexperienced operators and the pressures of the clinical environment may degrade precision and accuracy. Experienced operators are essential and cross-centre standards for training and QA should be established that build upon current guidance. Greater use of automation technologies may further minimise uncertainties.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 77
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] FACTORS AFFECTING PRECISION AND ACCURACY OF PO2 MEASUREMENTS USING CLARK ELECTRODE
    ISHERWOOD, DM
    ISHERWOO.DR
    ANNAN, W
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1972, 42 (02) : 295 - 301
  • [22] Advances in Ultrasound Image Guided Radiotherapy
    Salter, Bill
    Benedict, Stanley
    Hristov, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E287 - E287
  • [23] Advances in MRI-guided precision radiotherapy
    Liu, Chenyang
    Li, Mao
    Xiao, Haonan
    Li, Tian
    Li, Wen
    Zhang, Jiang
    Teng, Xinzhi
    Cai, Jing
    PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 6 (01): : 75 - 84
  • [24] Factors affecting the accuracy of respiratory tracking of the image-guided robotic radiosurgery system
    Mitsuhiro Inoue
    Kohei Okawa
    Junichi Taguchi
    Yoshifumi Hirota
    Yohei Yanagiya
    Chie Kikuchi
    Michio Iwabuchi
    Taro Murai
    Hiromitsu Iwata
    Hiroya Shiomi
    Izumi Koike
    Koshi Tatewaki
    Seiji Ohta
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2019, 37 : 727 - 734
  • [25] Factors affecting the accuracy of respiratory tracking of the image-guided robotic radiosurgery system
    Inoue, Mitsuhiro
    Okawa, Kohei
    Taguchi, Junichi
    Hirota, Yoshifumi
    Yanagiya, Yohei
    Kikuchi, Chie
    Iwabuchi, Michio
    Murai, Taro
    Iwata, Hiromitsu
    Shiomi, Hiroya
    Koike, Izumi
    Tatewaki, Koshi
    Ohta, Seiji
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 37 (10) : 727 - 734
  • [26] Factors affecting estimating accuracy
    Skitmore, R.Martin
    Cost Engineering (Morgantown, West Virginia), 1988, 30 (12): : 12 - 17
  • [27] Factors Contributing to Geometrical Accuracy in Online MRI-Linac Guided Brain Radiotherapy
    Ruschin, M.
    Mccann, C.
    Stewart, J.
    Maralani, P.
    Campbell, M.
    Kim, A.
    Lee, Y.
    Carty, A.
    Tseng, C.
    Sahgal, A.
    Keller, B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E422 - E423
  • [28] FACTORS AFFECTING ACCURACY OF INVITRO VALVAR PRESSURE-GRADIENT ESTIMATES BY DOPPLER ULTRASOUND
    VASKO, SD
    GOLDBERG, SJ
    REQUARTH, JA
    ALLEN, HD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1984, 54 (07): : 893 - 896
  • [29] Technical Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Bedside IVC Filter Placement Using Intravascular Ultrasound
    Hodgkiss-Harlow, Kelley
    Back, Martin R.
    Brumberg, Robert
    Armstrong, Paul
    Shames, Murray
    Johnson, Brad
    Bandyk, Dennis F.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 46 (04) : 293 - 299
  • [30] Factors affecting effects of ultrasound guided high intensity focused ultrasound for single uterine fibroids: a retrospective analysis
    Fan, Hong-Jie
    Cun, Jiang-Ping
    Zhao, Wei
    Huang, Jian-Qiang
    Yi, Gen-Fa
    Yao, Rui-Hong
    Gao, Bu-Lang
    Li, Xing-Hai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2019, 35 (01) : 534 - 540