A prospective study of 'circumferential purse-string approximation' vs. primary linear skin closure in stoma reversal

被引:2
作者
Bains, Manavdeep Singh [1 ]
Nar, Amandeep Singh [2 ]
Jabbal, Harmandeep Singh [3 ]
Mishra, Atul [2 ]
Mishra, Akashi [4 ]
Sharma, Priyanka [5 ]
机构
[1] Bains Gen & Surg Hosp, Nawanshahar, Punjab, India
[2] Dayanand Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
[3] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Gen Surg, Bathinda, Punjab, India
[4] Himalayan Inst Med Sci, Dehra Dun, Uttarakhand, India
[5] Adesh Inst Med Sci & Res, Dept Pathol, Bathinda, Punjab, India
关键词
Stoma; closure; reversal; technique; circumferential purse-string approximation; primary linear closure; surgical site infection; WOUND-INFECTION; ILEOSTOMY; RISK;
D O I
10.11604/pamj.2022.42.287.29213
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common complications that can occur after stoma closure. To date, there is no consensus on the ideal closure technique of the stoma wound to minimize postoperative SSI and multiple techniques have been proposed. We performed this study to assess the clinical outcome of wound healing after 'Primary Linear Closure' (PC) and 'Circumferential Purse-String Approximation' (CPA) techniques. Methods: this prospective observational study included all patients admitted to our tertiary care center, fulfilling the inclusion criteria for elective stoma closure from 1 st March 2018 to 1 March 2020 and prospective study was conducted on wound healing after stoma closure to compare difference in SSI rate between the PC group and the CPA group and to discuss the differences in patient satisfaction with wound healing. The following study was carried out with 36 patients in purse-string group and 66 patients in linear closure group. Results: surgical site infection (SSI) was observed only in primary linear closure group in 24% patients as opposed to 0% in purse string closure group. (p=0.039). Although the mean healing time of wound in linear closure group was significantly less than the purse string group (10.76 +/- 5.68 days and 14.17 +/- 2.04 days respectively), the overall total satisfaction score was higher in the purse string group. The purse string closure group showed significantly higher satisfaction score for expectations regarding appearance of scar/cosmesis, level of postoperative pain and difficulty of wound care (p>0.05). Conclusion: in our study, 'Circumferential Purse-String Approximation' is a superior technique than Primary Linear Closure for Stoma reversal in terms of rate of SSI and better overall patient satisfaction. CPA is a good alternative option, but further prospective randomized trials involving more patients are necessary before a definitive conclusion can be drawn.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Purse-String Versus Linear Conventional Skin Wound Closure of an Ileostomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial [J].
Alvandipour, Mina ;
Gharedaghi, Babak ;
Khodabakhsh, Hamed ;
Karami, Mohammad Yasin .
ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2016, 32 (04) :144-149
[2]   Pursestring skin closure after stoma reversal [J].
Banerjee, A .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1997, 40 (08) :993-994
[3]   Randomized Clinical Trial of Intestinal Ostomy Takedown Comparing Pursestring Wound Closure vs Conventional Closure to Eliminate the Risk of Wound Infection [J].
Camacho-Mauries, Daniel ;
Luis Rodriguez-Diaz, Jose ;
Salgado-Nesme, Noel ;
Gonzalez, Quintin H. ;
Vergara-Fernandez, Omar .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2013, 56 (02) :205-211
[4]   Purse-string vs. linear skin closure at loop ileostomy reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Gachabayov, M. ;
Lee, H. ;
Chudner, A. ;
Dyatlov, A. ;
Zhang, N. ;
Bergamaschi, R. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 23 (03) :207-220
[5]   A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown [J].
García-Botello, SA ;
García-Armengol, J ;
García-Granero, E ;
Espí, A ;
Juan, C ;
López-Mozos, F ;
Lledó, S .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 21 (5-6) :440-446
[6]  
HACKAM DJ, 1995, CAN J SURG, V38, P144
[7]   Influence of skin closure technique on surgical site infection after loop ileostomy reversal: Retrospective cohort study [J].
Klink, C. D. ;
Wuenschmann, M. ;
Binneboesel, M. ;
Alizai, H. P. ;
Lambertz, A. ;
Boehm, G. ;
Neumann, U. P. ;
Krones, C. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 11 (10) :1123-1125
[8]   Wound Infection Following Stoma Takedown: Primary Skin Closure versus Subcuticular Purse-string Suture [J].
Marquez, Thao T. ;
Christoforidis, Dimitrios ;
Abraham, Anasooya ;
Madoff, Robert D. ;
Rothenberger, David A. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 34 (12) :2877-2882
[9]   Management of colorectal cancer patients in Australia: The National Colorectal Cancer Care Survey [J].
McGrath, DR ;
Leong, DC ;
Armstrong, BK ;
Spigelman, AD .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 74 (1-2) :55-64
[10]   Wound Infection After Ileostomy Closure Can Be Eliminated by Circumferential Subcuticular Wound Approximation [J].
Milanchi, Siamak ;
Nasseri, Yosef ;
Kidner, Travis ;
Fleshner, Phillip .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (03) :469-474