Event-related potential studies of language and emotion: words, phrases, and task effects

被引:162
作者
Fischler, Ira [1 ]
Bradley, Margaret [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Psychol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
来源
UNDERSTANDING EMOTIONS | 2006年 / 156卷
关键词
language; emotion; event-related potentials; motivation; phrase;
D O I
10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56009-1
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This chapter reviews research that focuses on the effects of emotionality of single words, and of simple phrases, on event-related brain potentials when these are presented visually in various tasks. In these studies, presentation of emotionally evocative language material has consistently elicited a late (c. 300-600 ms post-onset) positive-going, largely frontal-central shift in the event-related potentials (ERPs), relative to neutral materials. Overall, affectively pleasant and unpleasant words or phrases are quite similar in their neuroelectric profiles and rarely differ substantively. This emotionality effect is enhanced in both amplitude and latency when emotional content is task relevant, but is also reliably observed when the task involves other semantically engaging tasks. On the other hand, it can be attenuated or eliminated when the task does not involve semantic evaluation (e.g., lexical decisions to words or orthographic judgments to the spelling patterns) or when comprehension of phrases requires integration of the connotative meaning of several words (e.g., compare dead puppy and dead tyrant). Taken together, these studies suggest that the emotionality of written language has a rapid and robust impact on ERPs, which can be modulated by specific task demands as well as the linguistic context in which the affective stimulus occurs.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 203
页数:19
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness [J].
Anderson, AK .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2005, 134 (02) :258-281
[2]   PHYSIOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION OF EMOTIONAL STATES [J].
ARNOLD, MB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1945, 52 (01) :35-48
[3]   THE GENERALITY OF THE AUTOMATIC ATTITUDE ACTIVATION EFFECT [J].
BARGH, JA ;
CHAIKEN, S ;
GOVENDER, R ;
PRATTO, F .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 (06) :893-912
[4]  
BELLEZZA FS, 1984, B PSYCHONOMIC SOC, V22, P377
[5]   Event-related brain potentials differentiate positive and negative mood adjectives during both supraliminal and subliminal visual processing [J].
Bernat, E ;
Bunce, S ;
Shevrin, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 42 (01) :11-34
[6]   MEASURING EMOTION - THE SELF-ASSESSMENT MANNEQUIN AND THE SEMANTIC DIFFERENTIAL [J].
BRADLEY, MM ;
LANG, PJ .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOR THERAPY AND EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHIATRY, 1994, 25 (01) :49-59
[7]  
BRADLEY MM, 1998, A8 U FLOR CTR RES PS
[8]  
BRADLEY MM, 2000, COGNITIVE NEUROSCIEN
[9]   Sentence interference in the Stroop task [J].
Brega, AG ;
Healy, AF .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1999, 27 (05) :768-778
[10]   Attitudes to the right: Evaluative processing is associated with lateralized late positive event-related brain potentials [J].
Cacioppo, JT ;
Crites, SL ;
Gardner, WL .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1996, 22 (12) :1205-1219