Generating UML Activity Diagram from SBVR Rules

被引:0
作者
Iqbal, Usama [1 ]
Bajwa, Imran Sarwar [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Coll Business Adm & Econ, Dept Comp Sci & IT, Lahore, Pakistan
[2] Islamia Univ Bahawalpur, Dept Comp Sci & IT, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
来源
2016 SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY (INTECH) | 2016年
关键词
Automated Software Modelling; UML; SBVR;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
UML is actually a standard that is used in the production of software models. Its function is to facilitate the working of visuals of software artifacts. In order to produce a UML diagram, manufacturer has to gather all the software requirements in a natural like English r semi formal like SBVR language. After that he analyzes and produces the activity diagram manually in an available case tool. One of the main advantages of converting SBVR software requirements automatically into UML is that it minimizes the burden of a system analyst which in turn increases the quality and robustness of a software modeling phase. The paper presents the challenging aspect of transformation from SBVR into UML activity diagram. This method takes the system input requirements specifically in SBVR syntax then parses the whole input specification. It then chooses the UML ingredients like Fact type, Noun, Verb etc and at last generates the visual presentation of selected information. The whole process is fully automated. It is explained through an
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 219
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Akehurst DH, 2006, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4199, P351
  • [2] Anandha G.S., 2006, LNCS
  • [3] Bajwa I., 2011, AAAI SPRING S TECHN
  • [4] Bajwa IS, 2011, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6698, P132, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21470-7_10
  • [5] OCL Constraints Generation from Natural Language Specification
    Bajwa, Imran Sarwar
    Bordbar, Behzad
    Lee, Mark G.
    [J]. 2010 14TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISE DISTRIBUTED OBJECT COMPUTING CONFERENCE (EDOC 2010), 2010, : 204 - 213
  • [6] Bajwa IS., 2009, European Journal of Scientific Research, V35, P22
  • [7] Bryant B., 2008, WORKSH S E EMB SYST, P51
  • [8] Hirschman Lynette., 1995, Survey of the State of the Art in Human Language Technology
  • [9] Ilieva M.G., 2005, P NAT LANG PROC INF
  • [10] Ilivea G. M., 2008, REPRESENTING TEXTUAL, P478