The comparison of colloidal, optical, and solar collection characteristics between Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 nanofluids operated in an evacuated tubular volumetric absorption solar collector

被引:14
作者
Hosseini, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh [1 ]
Dehaj, Mohammad Shafiey [2 ]
机构
[1] Vali E Asr Univ Rafsanjan, Dept Chem Engn, Rafsanjan, Iran
[2] Vali E Asr Univ Rafsanjan, Dept Mech Engn, Rafsanjan, Iran
关键词
Direct absorption solar collectors; Fe- 2 O( 3 )nanofluid; Fe-; 3; O-; 4; nanofluid; Photo-thermal efficiency; FLAT-PLATE; NANOPARTICLES; CONVERSION; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104381
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Background: The iron oxide nanoparticles as low-cost, eco-friendly, and efficient nanomaterials exhibit interesting optical properties which make them valuable for nanofluids-based volumetric absorption solar collectors. Methods: The first aim of this study is to experimentally compare the colloidal stability and optical properties of Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 nanofluids in three volume fractions of 0.005, 0.01, and 0.02%. To the following, it is intended to examine the energy conversion efficiency of these nanofluids in an evacuated tubular volumetric absorption solar collector according to the ASHREA standard. Significant findings: Based on the results, the size and morphology of the iron oxide nanoparticles were nearly similar together, but when dispersed in water they exhibited different colloidal and optical properties. For example, the Fe2O3 nanofluids showed considerable spectral extinction coefficients in the visible range, while the Fe3O4 nanofluids presented limited extinction coefficients in the ultraviolet region with the lower values. At penetration depth of 4 cm, the 0.02%-Fe2O3 nanofluid resulted in a 100% solar weighted absorption fraction in comparison to 83.2% of the Fe3O4 nanofluid with the same volume fraction. According to the collector results, the Fe2O3 nanofluids displayed greater enhancement in the solar to thermal energy conversion than the Fe3O4 nanofluids. The maximum efficiency was 73% at 0.02%-Fe2O3 nanofluid and 51% at 0.02%Fe3O4 nanofluid. (c) 2022 Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Experimental photothermal performance of nanofluids under concentrated solar flux [J].
Amjad, Muhammad ;
Jin, Haichuan ;
Du, Xiaoze ;
Wen, Dongsheng .
SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2018, 182 :255-262
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Standard tables for reference solar spectral irradiance at air mass 1.5: direct normal and hemispherical on 37 degree tilted surface
[3]  
ASHRAE, 1977, 9377 ASHRAE
[4]  
Baird D.C., 1995, EXPT INTRO MEASUREME, V3rd
[5]   Review of the Photothermal Energy Conversion Performance of Nanofluids, Their Applications, and Recent Advances [J].
Boldoo, Tsogtbilegt ;
Ham, Jeonggyun ;
Kim, Eui ;
Cho, Honghyun .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (21)
[6]   Efficiency of the parabolic through solar collector using NiFe2O4/Water nanofluid and U-tube [J].
Dehaj, Mohammad Shafiey ;
Rezaeian, Mohsen ;
Mousavi, Davoud ;
Shamsi, Sajjad ;
Salarmofrad, Masoud .
JOURNAL OF THE TAIWAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2021, 120 :136-149
[7]   A review of nanofluid-based direct absorption solar collectors: Design considerations and experiments with hybrid PV/Thermal and direct steam generation collectors [J].
Goel, Nipun ;
Taylor, Robert A. ;
Otanicar, Todd .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 145 (145) :903-913
[8]   Comparison of thermal performance between a surface and a volumetric absorption solar collector using water and Fe3O4 nanofluid [J].
Ham, Jeonggyun ;
Shin, Yunchan ;
Cho, Honghyun .
ENERGY, 2022, 239
[9]   An experimental investigation on the solar-thermal energy conversion performance of Fe2O3 nanofluid with the focus on nanoparticles shape and concentration [J].
Hosseini, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh ;
Ayar, Danesh ;
Talebizadeh, Alireza ;
Kamyabi, Mohammadmahdi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2022, 46 (05) :6126-6143
[10]   An experimental study on energetic performance evaluation of a parabolic trough solar collector operating with Al2O3/water and GO/water nanofluids [J].
Hosseini, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh ;
Dehaj, Mohammad Shafiey .
ENERGY, 2021, 234 (234)