German-language translation of the PANELVIEW instrument to evaluate the guideline development process from the perspective of the guideline group

被引:2
作者
Goossen, Kaethe [1 ,7 ]
Becker, Monika [1 ,7 ]
Mathes, Tim [1 ,7 ]
Follmann, Markus [2 ,7 ]
Holtkamp, Ulrike [3 ,7 ]
Hostettler, Stefanie [4 ,7 ,8 ]
Meerpohl, Joerg J. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Nothacker, Monika [7 ]
Schaefer, Corinna [7 ]
Schmidt, Stefanie [7 ,9 ]
Schuenemann, Holger J. [7 ]
Sommer, Isolde [7 ]
Tholen, Rheina [7 ,10 ,11 ]
Skoetz, Nicole [6 ,7 ]
Pieper, Dawid [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witten Herdecke, Inst Forsch Operativen Med IFOM, Abt evidenzbasierte Versorgungsforschung, Cologne, Germany
[2] Deutsch Krebsgesellschaft, Berlin, Germany
[3] Deutsch Leukamie & Lymphom Hilfe e V, Bonn, Germany
[4] FMH Verbindung Schweizer Arztinnen Arzte, Bern, Switzerland
[5] Univ Freiburg, Inst Evidenz Med, Univ klinikum & Med Fak, Freiburg, Germany
[6] AWMF Inst Med Wissensmanagement, c-o Philipps Univ Marburg-AWMF, Berlin, Germany
[7] UroEvidenceDeutsche Gesell Urol, Berlin, Germany
[8] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[9] Donau Univ Krems, Dept Evidenzbasierte Med & Evaluat, Krems, Austria
[10] Ft und Weiterbildung, Deutsch Verband Physiotherapie ZVK e v, Kompetenzzentrum Wissensch, Cologne, Germany
[11] Univ Cologne, Med Fak, Klinikfur Innere Med 1, Evidenz basierte Onkol, Cologne, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN | 2022年 / 168卷
关键词
Guidelines; Evaluation; Guideline development; Survey; Process;
D O I
10.1016/j.zefq.2021.11.004
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The development process for clinical guidelines is influenced by factors that are relevant to the validity of a guideline but often are not captured sufficiently in the final guideline documents. PANELVIEW is an English-language tool that can be used to explore the guideline development process from the perspective of guideline group members. Our aim was to translate the PANELVIEW tool into German, taking into account national contexts and linguistic differences.Methods: The PANELVIEW tool was initially translated by a core team, then refined and approved by a group of experts in a consensus-based Delphi process. The experts were selected on the basis of their experience in guideline development covering different fields (clinical, methodological, organisational, health professional, patient perspective) and geographical regions (Germany, Austria, Switzerland). A representative of the original PANELVIEW team was also involved. The Delphi steps included an online survey, an online consensus conference and final approval by circulating the results via email. Individual items were seen as generally agreed upon if the level of agreement in the respective steps was 75 % or more.Results: The expert group consisted of 12 persons. Of these, 11 (92 %) participated in the online survey and 10 (83 %) in the subsequent consensus conference. After the first Delphi step, sufficient agreement was achieved for 19 of 34 items (56 %). The remaining 15 items were discussed in the consensus conference and finally obtained 100 % agreement. The discussion focused on clarifying and adapting terms whose meaning was ambiguous or inadequate in the German context, which led to a deviation from the original wording in some instances.Discussion: The PANELVIEW tool was translated into German by means of a Delphi process. PANELVIEW complements existing instruments for assessing the methodological quality of guidelines by capturing the perspective of the guideline group. This will enable guideline developers and organisations to identify problems in the drafting process and avoid them in future projects. User testing and validation of the German-language PANELVIEW tool are planned for the future.Conclusion: The German-language translation of PANELVIEW will enable guideline developers in German-speaking countries to continuously evaluate and, where necessary, improve the process and methods of guideline development.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 112
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, ARB FORSCH LANDES
  • [2] Barni S, 2011, TUMORI J, V97, P559, DOI 10.1700/989.10711
  • [3] AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care
    Brouwers, Melissa C.
    Kho, Michelle E.
    Browman, George P.
    Burgers, Jako S.
    Cluzeau, Francoise
    Feder, Gene
    Fervers, Beatrice
    Graham, Ian D.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy
    Hanna, Steven E.
    Littlejohns, Peter
    Makarski, Julie
    Zitzelsberger, Louise
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2010, 182 (18) : E839 - E842
  • [4] Importance of clinical practice guidelines to practicing pediatric nephrologists and IPNA survey
    Hari, Pankaj
    Alhasan, Khalid
    Bagga, Arvind
    Bonilla-Felix, Melvin
    Coccia, Paula Alejandra
    Duzova, Ali
    Ha, Ill-So
    Montini, Giovanni
    Nakanishi, Koichi
    Samuel, Susan
    Xu, Hong
    Boyer, Olivia
    Haffner, Dieter
    [J]. PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 36 (11) : 3493 - 3497
  • [5] Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review
    Juenger, Saskia
    Payne, Sheila A.
    Brine, Jenny
    Radbruch, Lukas
    Brearley, Sarah G.
    [J]. PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 31 (08) : 684 - 706
  • [6] Muniz Garcia Javier, 2006, Rev Esp Cardiol, V6 Suppl F, P2, DOI 10.1157/13091620
  • [7] Author's specialty and conflicts of interest contribute to conflicting guidelines for screening mammography
    Norris, Susan L.
    Burda, Brittany U.
    Holmer, Haley K.
    Ogden, Lauren A.
    Fu, Rongwei
    Bero, Lisa
    Schuenemann, Holger
    Deyo, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (07) : 725 - 733
  • [8] Reflections on 20 years of clinical practice guideline programmes in Germany: what is their impact?
    Nothacker, Monika
    Muche-Borowski, Cathleen
    Kopp, Ina B.
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2014, 108 (10): : 550 - 559
  • [9] Impact of group structure and process on multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline development: an observational study
    Pagliari, C
    Grimshaw, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2002, 8 (02) : 145 - 153
  • [10] The potential influence of small group processes on guideline development
    Pagliari, C
    Grimshaw, J
    Eccles, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 7 (02) : 165 - 173