Reasons for accepting or declining Down syndrome screening in Dutch prospective mothers within the context of national policy and healthcare system characteristics: a qualitative study

被引:25
作者
Crombag, Neeltje M. T. H. [1 ]
Boeije, Hennie [2 ]
Iedema-Kuiper, Rita [1 ]
Schielen, Peter C. J. I. [3 ]
Visser, Gerard H. A. [1 ]
Bensing, Jozien M. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Obstet, POB 85090,Room KE04-123-1, NL-3508 AB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Ctr Infect Dis Res Diagnost & Screening IDS, Bilthoven, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Fac Social & Behav Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH | 2016年 / 16卷
关键词
Down syndrome; Trisomy; 21; Prenatal counselling; First trimester combined testing; Down syndrome screening; Prenatal anomaly screening; Informed decision making; Healthcare system characteristics; Focus group study; Qualitative study; NETHERLANDS; AMBIVALENCE; AGE; ATTITUDES; ENGLAND; CHOICE; MATTER; TESTS; WOMEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-016-0910-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Uptake rates for Down syndrome screening in the Netherlands are low compared to other European countries. To investigate the low uptake, we explored women's reasons for participation and possible influences of national healthcare system characteristics. Dutch prenatal care is characterised by an approach aimed at a low degree of medicalisation, with pregnant women initially considered to be at low risk. Prenatal screening for Down syndrome is offered to all women, with a 'right not to know' for women who do not want to be informed on this screening. At the time this study was performed, the test was not reimbursed for women aged 35 and younger. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study to explore reasons for participation and possible influences of healthcare system characteristics. Data were collected via ten semi-structured focus groups with women declining or accepting the offer of Down syndrome screening (n = 46). All focus groups were audio-and videotaped, transcribed verbatim, coded and content analysed. Results: Women declining Down syndrome screening did not consider Down syndrome a condition severe enough to justify termination of pregnancy. Young women declining felt supported in their decision by perceived confirmation of their obstetric caregiver and reassured by system characteristics (costs and age restriction). Women accepting Down syndrome screening mainly wanted to be reassured or be prepared to care for a child with Down syndrome. By weighing up the pros and cons of testing, obstetric caregivers supported young women who accepted in the decision-making process. This was helpful, although some felt the need to defend their decision to accept the test offer due to their young age. For some young women accepting testing, costs were considered a disincentive to participate. Conclusions: Presentation of prenatal screening affects how the offer is attended to, perceived and utilised. By offering screening with age restriction and additional costs, declining is considered the preferred choice, which might account for low Dutch uptake rates. Autonomous and informed decision-making in Down syndrome screening should be based on the personal interest in knowing the individual risk of having a child with Down syndrome and system characteristics should not influence participation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] REVISITING THE BEHAVIORAL-MODEL AND ACCESS TO MEDICAL-CARE - DOES IT MATTER
    ANDERSEN, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR, 1995, 36 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [2] [Anonymous], QUALITATIVE RES PRAC
  • [3] Low uptake of the combined test in the Netherlands - which factors contribute?
    Bakker, Merel
    Birnie, Erwin
    Pajkrt, Eva
    Bilardo, Caterina Maddalena
    Snijders, Rosalinde Johanna Maria
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2012, 32 (13) : 1305 - 1312
  • [4] Position statement from the Aneuploidy Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis
    Benn, Peter
    Borell, Antoni
    Chiu, Rossa
    Cuckle, Howard
    Dugoff, Lorraine
    Faas, Brigitte
    Gross, Susan
    Johnson, Joann
    Maymon, Ron
    Norton, Mary
    Odibo, Anthony
    Schielen, Peter
    Spencer, Kevin
    Huang, Tianhua
    Wright, Dave
    Yaron, Yuval
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2013, 33 (07) : 622 - 629
  • [5] Blondel B, 2012, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), V41, pe1, DOI 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.04.014
  • [6] Bryant LD, 2009, PSYCHOL HEALTH, V10, P1
  • [7] Attitudinal ambivalence towards Down's syndrome and uncertainty in prenatal testing and termination intentions
    Bryant, Louise D.
    Green, Josephine M.
    Hewison, Jenny
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 29 (03) : 250 - 261
  • [8] Determinants of first trimester combined test participation within the central region of the Netherlands
    Crombag, Neeltje M. T. H.
    Schielen, Peter C. J. I.
    Hukkelhoven, Chantal W.
    Iedema, Rita
    Bensing, Jozien M.
    Visser, Gerard H. A.
    Stoutenbeek, Philip
    Koster, Maria P. H.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 35 (05) : 486 - 492
  • [9] Explaining variation in Down's syndrome screening uptake: comparing the Netherlands with England and Denmark using documentary analysis and expert stakeholder interviews
    Crombag, Neeltje M. T. H.
    Vellinga, Ynke E.
    Kluijfhout, Sandra A.
    Bryant, Louise D.
    Ward, Pat A.
    Iedema-Kuiper, Rita
    Schielen, Peter C. J. I.
    Bensing, Jozien M.
    Visser, Gerard H. A.
    Tabor, Ann
    Hirst, Janet
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [10] ESTIMATING A WOMANS RISK OF HAVING A PREGNANCY ASSOCIATED WITH DOWNS-SYNDROME USING HER AGE AND SERUM ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN LEVEL
    CUCKLE, HS
    WALD, NJ
    THOMPSON, SG
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1987, 94 (05): : 387 - 402