Magnetic resonance imaging for secondary assessment of breast density in a high-risk cohort

被引:106
作者
Klifa, Catherine [1 ]
Carballido-Gamio, Julio [1 ]
Wilmes, Lisa [1 ]
Laprie, Anne [2 ]
Shepherd, John [1 ]
Gibbs, Jessica [1 ]
Fan, Bo [1 ]
Noworolski, Susan [1 ]
Hylton, Nola [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Inst Claude Rigaud, Dept Radiat Oncol, F-31052 Toulouse, France
关键词
Volumetric breast density; Breast MRI; Fuzzy c-means; Segmentation; Breast cancer risk; Mammographic density; MR breast density; X-RAY MAMMOGRAPHY; CANCER RISK; WOMEN; ACCURACY; PATTERNS; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2009.05.040
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A quantitative measure of three-dimensional breast density derived from noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was investigated in 35 women at high-risk for breast cancer. A semiautomatic segmentation tool was used to quantify the total volume of the breast and to separate volumes of fibroglandular and adipose tissue in noncontrast MRI data. The MRI density measure was defined as the ratio of breast fibroglandular volume over total volume of the breast. The overall correlation between MRI and mammographic density measures was R(2)=.67. However the MRI/mammography density correlation was higher in patients with lower breast density (R(2)=.73) than in patients with higher breast density (R(2)=.26). Women with mammographic density higher than 25% exhibited very different magnetic resonance density measures spread over a broad range of values. These results suggest that MRI may provide a volumetric measure more representative of breast composition than mammography, particularly in groups of women with dense breasts. Magnetic resonance imaging density could potentially be quantified and used for a better assessment of breast cancer risk in these populations. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 15
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[2]  
[Anonymous], Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms
[3]   REVIEW OF MR IMAGE SEGMENTATION TECHNIQUES USING PATTERN-RECOGNITION [J].
BEZDEK, JC ;
HALL, LO ;
CLARKE, LP .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (04) :1033-1048
[4]  
Boyd NF, 1998, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V7, P1133
[5]   Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: Results from a randomized trial [J].
Boyd, NF ;
Greenberg, C ;
Lockwood, G ;
Little, L ;
Martin, L ;
Byng, J ;
Yaffe, M ;
Tritchler, D .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (07) :488-496
[6]   THE QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITIES [J].
BYNG, JW ;
BOYD, NF ;
FISHELL, E ;
JONG, RA ;
YAFFE, MJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 39 (10) :1629-1638
[7]   Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms [J].
Byng, JW ;
Yaffe, MJ ;
Jong, RA ;
Shumak, RS ;
Lockwood, GA ;
Tritchler, DL ;
Boyd, NF .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1998, 18 (06) :1587-1598
[8]   MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND BREAST-CANCER RISK - EFFECTS WITH TIME, AGE, AND MENOPAUSE STATUS [J].
BYRNE, C ;
SCHAIRER, C ;
WOLFE, J ;
PAREKH, N ;
SALANE, M ;
BRINTON, LA ;
HOOVER, R ;
HAILE, R .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (21) :1622-1629
[9]  
CARBALLIDOGAMIO J, 2004, APPL FUZZY INFERENCE
[10]   Effect of raloxifene on mammographic density and breast magnetic resonance imaging in premenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer [J].
Eng-Wong, Jennifer ;
Orzano-Birgani, Jennifer ;
Chow, Catherine K. ;
Venzon, David ;
Yao, Jianhua ;
Galbo, Claudia E. ;
Zujewski, Jo Anne ;
Prindiville, Sheila .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2008, 17 (07) :1696-1701