The effect of study arm on prostate cancer treatment in the large screening trial ERSPC

被引:65
作者
Wolters, Tineke [1 ]
Roobol, Monique J. [1 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout W. [2 ]
van den Bergh, Roderick C. N. [1 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [1 ]
Hugosson, Jonas [3 ]
Ciatto, Stefano [4 ]
Kwiatkowski, Maciej [5 ]
Villers, Arnauld [6 ]
Lujan, Marcos [7 ]
Nelen, Vera [8 ]
Tammela, Teuvo L. J. [9 ]
Schroder, Fritz H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Inst Studio & Prevenz Oncol, Florence, Italy
[5] Kantonsspital Aarau, Dept Urol, Aarau, Switzerland
[6] Huriez Hosp, Dept Urol, Lille, France
[7] Hosp Infanta Cristina, Unidad Urol, Madrid, Spain
[8] Oncol Ctr Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
[9] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Tampere, Finland
关键词
prostate cancer; screening; treatment; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ANTIGEN; ROTTERDAM; MORTALITY; SECTION;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.24870
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Prostate cancer (PC) mortality is the most valid end-point in screening trials, but could be influenced by the choice of initial treatment if treatment has an effect on mortality. In this study, PC treatment was compared between the screening and control arms in a screening trial. Data were collected from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). The characteristics and initial treatment of PC cases detected in the screening and the control arm were compared. Polytomous logistic regression analysis was used to assess the influence of study arm on treatment, adjusting for potential confounders and with statistical imputation of missing values. A total of 8,389 PC cases were detected, 5,422 in the screening arm and 3,145 in the control arm. Polytomous regression showed that trial arm was associated with treatment choice after correction for missing values, especially in men with high-risk PC. A control subject with high-risk PC was more likely than a screen subject to receive radiotherapy (OR: 1.43, 95% Cl: 1.01-2.05, p = 0.047), expectant management (OR: 2.92, 95% Cl: 133-6.42, p = 0.007) or hormonal treatment (OR: 1.77, 95% Cl: 1.07-2.94, p = 0.026) instead of radical prostatectomy. However, trial arm had only a minor role in treatment choice compared to other variables. In conclusion, a small effect of trial arm on treatment choice was seen, particularly in men with high-risk PC. Therefore, differences in treatment between arms are unlikely to play a major role in the interpretation of the results of the ERSPC.
引用
收藏
页码:2387 / 2393
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating
[2]   Prostate cancer screening decreases the absolute risk of being diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer - Results from a prospective, population-based randomized controlled trial [J].
Aus, Gunnar ;
Bergdahl, Suante ;
Lodding, Par ;
Liija, Hans ;
Hugosson, Jonas .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (03) :659-664
[3]   Lead-time in prostate cancer screening (Finland) [J].
Auvinen, A ;
Määttänen, L ;
Stenman, UH ;
Tammela, T ;
Rannikko, S ;
Aro, J ;
Juusela, H ;
Hakama, M .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2002, 13 (03) :279-285
[4]   Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of early detected prostate cancer [J].
Bangma, C. H. ;
Roemeling, S. ;
Schroder, F. H. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 25 (01) :3-9
[5]   Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial [J].
Bolla, M ;
Collette, L ;
Blank, L ;
Warde, P ;
Dubois, JB ;
Mirimanoff, RO ;
Storme, G ;
Bernier, J ;
Kuten, A ;
Sternberg, C ;
Mattelaer, J ;
Torecilla, JL ;
Pfeffer, JR ;
Cutajar, CL ;
Zurlo, A ;
Pierart, M .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9327) :103-108
[6]   Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Whittington, R ;
Malkowicz, SB ;
Schultz, D ;
Blank, K ;
Broderick, GA ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Beard, CJ ;
Wein, A .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (11) :969-974
[7]   Factors that determine the treatment for local and regional prostate cancer [J].
Desch, CE ;
Penberthy, L ;
Newschaffer, CJ ;
Hillner, BE ;
Whittemore, M ;
McClish, D ;
Smith, TJ ;
Retchin, SM .
MEDICAL CARE, 1996, 34 (02) :152-162
[8]   Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening:: Estimates from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer [J].
Draisma, G ;
Boer, R ;
Otto, SJ ;
van der Cruijsen, IW ;
Damhuis, RAM ;
Schröder, FH ;
de Koning, HJ .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (12) :868-878
[9]   Results of a randomized, population-based study of biennial screening using serum prostate-specific antigen measurement to detect prostate carcinoma [J].
Hugosson, J ;
Aus, G ;
Lilja, H ;
Lodding, P ;
Pihl, CG .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (07) :1397-1405
[10]  
LITTLE R. J., 2019, Statistical analysis with missing data, V793