HER2 in situ hybridization test in breast cancer: quantifying margins of error and genetic heterogeneity

被引:7
作者
Polonia, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Caramelo, Ana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Inst Mol Pathol & Immunol, Ipatimup Diagnost, Dept Pathol, Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Inst Invest & Inovacao Saude I3S, Porto, Portugal
关键词
PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; ASCO/CAP GUIDELINE; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; ISCHEMIC TIME; RECOMMENDATIONS; AMPLIFICATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; LABORATORIES;
D O I
10.1038/s41379-021-00813-x
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of counting increasing number of invasive cancer cells in the result of the HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) test in breast cancer as well as to compare two different approaches of measuring genomic heterogeneity (single cell and population based). A cohort of 100 consecutive breast cancer cases (primary and metastatic) were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification with bright-field ISH. The evaluation of the samples included scoring 20 nuclei, in five different areas, measuring the margins of error for each case. Genomic heterogeneity (GH) was defined by the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline as a discrete population of tumor cells with HER2 amplification. We also evaluated GH as single tumor cells with HER2 amplification. The stabilization of the coefficient of variation of HER2/CEP17 ratio requires about 60 invasive cancer cells. The average margin of error of HER2/CEP17 ratio and of HER2 copy number was 0.40 and 0.53, respectively, when counting 20 cells, decreasing to 0.20 and 0.26 when counting 100 cells. Population GH was observed in 1% of the cases, while single cell GH was observed in 27% of the cases, reaching its maximum value in cases near the thresholds of positivity. Therefore, margins of error in HER2 ISH test are high, and the minimal cell number recommended in current guidelines should be raised to at least 60 cells. Population GH is a rare event and single cell GH is maximal in cases near the thresholds.
引用
收藏
页码:1478 / 1486
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   The Comparison of Automated Silver in situ Hybridization and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization for Evaluating HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Carcinoma [J].
Kim, Tae-Jung ;
Kim, Tae Eun ;
Jung, Eun Sun ;
Yim, Hyeon Woo ;
Song, Byung Joo ;
Jung, Sang Seol ;
Lee, Ahwon ;
Choi, Yeong-Jin ;
Lee, Kyo-Young .
JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2009, 12 (04) :295-301
[42]   Comparison of Dako fluorescence in situ hybridization assays (FISH and IQFISH) in the assessment of HER2 amplification in breast cancer [J].
McClanaghan, Maegan ;
Vandenberg, Jill ;
Colley, Elizabeth ;
Stead, Ronald .
JOURNAL OF HISTOTECHNOLOGY, 2014, 37 (03) :90-94
[43]   A Retrospective Population-Based Comparison of HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Breast Carcinomas Impact of 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Criteria [J].
Schalper, Kurt A. ;
Kumar, Sudha ;
Hui, Pei ;
Rimm, David L. ;
Gershkovich, Peter .
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 138 (02) :213-219
[44]   Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guidelines update for HER2 testing by FISH in breast cancer [J].
Xu, Bin ;
Shen, Jianguo ;
Guo, Wenhao ;
Zhao, Wenhe ;
Zhuang, Yiyu ;
Wang, Linbo .
PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 215 (02) :251-255
[45]   Genetic variants in the HER2 gene: Influence on HER2 overexpression and loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer [J].
Cresti, Nicola ;
Lee, Joanne ;
Rourke, Emma ;
Televantou, Despina ;
Jamieson, David ;
Verrill, Mark ;
Boddy, Alan V. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 55 :27-37
[46]   UK recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer: an update [J].
Rakha, Emad A. ;
Tan, Puay Hoon ;
Quinn, Cecily ;
Provenzano, Elena ;
Shaaban, Abeer M. ;
Deb, Rahul ;
Callagy, Grace ;
Starczynski, Jane ;
Lee, Andrew H. S. ;
Ellis, Ian O. ;
Pinder, Sarah E. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2023, 76 (04) :217-227
[47]   Updated UK Recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer [J].
Rakha, Emad A. ;
Pinder, Sarah E. ;
Bartlett, John M. S. ;
Ibrahim, Merdol ;
Starczynski, Jane ;
Carder, Pauline J. ;
Provenzano, Elena ;
Hanby, Andrew ;
Hales, Sally ;
Lee, Andrew H. S. ;
Ellis, Ian O. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2015, 68 (02) :93-99
[48]   Locoregional recurrence in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer [J].
Brollo, Janaina ;
Kneubil, Maximiliano Cassilha ;
Botteri, Edoardo ;
Rotmensz, Nicole ;
Duso, Bruno Achutti ;
Fumagalli, Luca ;
Locatelli, Marzia Adelia ;
Criscitiello, Carmen ;
Lohsiriwat, Visnu ;
Goldhirsch, Aron ;
Leonardi, Maria Cristina ;
Orecchia, Roberto ;
Curigliano, Giuseppe .
BREAST, 2013, 22 (05) :856-862
[49]   Effect of Ischemic Time, Fixation Time, and Fixative Type on HER2/neu Immunohistochemical and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results in Breast Cancer [J].
Moatamed, Neda A. ;
Nanjangud, Gouri ;
Pucci, Richard ;
Lowe, Alarice ;
Shintaku, I. Peter ;
Shapourifar-Tehrani, Saeedeh ;
Rao, Nagesh ;
Lu, David Y. ;
Apple, Sophia K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2011, 136 (05) :754-761
[50]   Establishment of the Australian In Situ Hybridization Program for the Assessment of HER2 Amplification in Breast Cancer: A Model for the Introduction of New Biomarkers Into Clinical Practice [J].
Farshid, Gelareh ;
Armes, Jane E. ;
Bell, Richard ;
Cummings, Margaret ;
Fox, Stephen ;
Francis, Glenn ;
Haswell, Martin ;
Morey, Adrienne ;
McCue, Glenda ;
Raymond, Wendy ;
Robbins, Peter ;
Bilous, Michael .
DIAGNOSTIC MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, 2010, 19 (04) :187-193