HER2 in situ hybridization test in breast cancer: quantifying margins of error and genetic heterogeneity

被引:7
作者
Polonia, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Caramelo, Ana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Inst Mol Pathol & Immunol, Ipatimup Diagnost, Dept Pathol, Porto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Inst Invest & Inovacao Saude I3S, Porto, Portugal
关键词
PROGESTERONE-RECEPTOR; MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY; ASCO/CAP GUIDELINE; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; AMERICAN-SOCIETY; ISCHEMIC TIME; RECOMMENDATIONS; AMPLIFICATION; CHEMOTHERAPY; LABORATORIES;
D O I
10.1038/s41379-021-00813-x
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of counting increasing number of invasive cancer cells in the result of the HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) test in breast cancer as well as to compare two different approaches of measuring genomic heterogeneity (single cell and population based). A cohort of 100 consecutive breast cancer cases (primary and metastatic) were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification with bright-field ISH. The evaluation of the samples included scoring 20 nuclei, in five different areas, measuring the margins of error for each case. Genomic heterogeneity (GH) was defined by the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline as a discrete population of tumor cells with HER2 amplification. We also evaluated GH as single tumor cells with HER2 amplification. The stabilization of the coefficient of variation of HER2/CEP17 ratio requires about 60 invasive cancer cells. The average margin of error of HER2/CEP17 ratio and of HER2 copy number was 0.40 and 0.53, respectively, when counting 20 cells, decreasing to 0.20 and 0.26 when counting 100 cells. Population GH was observed in 1% of the cases, while single cell GH was observed in 27% of the cases, reaching its maximum value in cases near the thresholds of positivity. Therefore, margins of error in HER2 ISH test are high, and the minimal cell number recommended in current guidelines should be raised to at least 60 cells. Population GH is a rare event and single cell GH is maximal in cases near the thresholds.
引用
收藏
页码:1478 / 1486
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fully Automated Fluorescent in situ Hybridization (FISH) Staining and Digital Analysis of HER2 in Breast Cancer: A Validation Study
    van der Logt, Elise M. J.
    Kuperus, Deborah A. J.
    van Setten, Jan W.
    van den Heuvel, Marius C.
    Boers, James. E.
    Schuuring, Ed
    Kibbelaar, Robby E.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [22] HER2 Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer, an Evolving Concept
    Hou, Yanjun
    Nitta, Hiroaki
    Li, Zaibo
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [23] Genetic Heterogeneity in HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer Panel Summary and Guidelines
    Vance, Gail H.
    Barry, Todd S.
    Bloom, Kenneth J.
    Fitzgibbons, Patrick L.
    Hicks, David G.
    Jenkins, Robert B.
    Persons, Diane L.
    Tubbs, Raymond R.
    Hammond, Elizabeth H.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 133 (04) : 611 - 612
  • [24] Changes in HER2 Amplification Status for Breast Cancer Patients After Immunohistochemistry Directed In Situ Hybridization
    Beech, Cameron
    Wilcock, Diane M.
    Moore, Kristina H.
    Rowe, Leslie
    Mahlow, Jonathan
    Jedrzkiewicz, Jolanta
    Cleary, Allison S.
    Lomo, Lesley
    Ruano, Ana L.
    Gering, Maarika
    Bradshaw, Derek
    Maughan, Meghan
    Tran, Phuong
    Davis, Richard
    Affolter, Kajsa
    Albertson, Daniel J.
    Adelhardt, Parisa
    Kim, Jongtaek
    Coleman, Joshua F.
    Deftereos, Georgios
    Gulbahce, Evin H.
    Sirohi, Deepika
    APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, 2025, 33 (02) : 91 - 102
  • [25] Comparison of Silver-Enhanced in situ Hybridization and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization for HER2 Gene Status in Breast Carcinomas
    Kang, Jun
    Kwon, Gui Young
    Lee, Young-Hee
    Gong, Gyungyub
    JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2009, 12 (04) : 235 - 240
  • [26] Automated Silver-enhanced In Situ Hybridization for Evaluation of HER2 Gene Status in Breast Carcinoma: Comparison with Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry
    Sung, Woo Jung
    Park, Seok Ju
    Gu, Mi Jin
    Bae, Young Kyung
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2010, 44 (01) : 28 - 34
  • [27] HER2 Dual In Situ Hybridization Correlations and Cautions
    Troxell, Megan
    Sibley, Richard K.
    West, Robert B.
    Bean, Gregory R.
    Allison, Kimberly H.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 144 (12) : 1525 - 1534
  • [28] Determination of the HER2 amplification status by in situ fluorescent hybridization and concordance with immunohistochemistry for breast cancer samples in Colombia
    Plata, Adriana
    Torres, Maria Mercedes
    Lopez, Rocio
    Andrade, Rafael E.
    COLOMBIA MEDICA, 2013, 44 (02): : 108 - 114
  • [29] Differential prognostic value of positive HER2 status determined by immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast cancer
    Stocker, Albina
    Trojan, Andreas
    Elfgen, Constanze
    Hilbers, Marie-Louis
    Moskovszky, Linda
    Varga, Zsuzsanna
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 183 (02) : 311 - 319
  • [30] HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity analyses by concurrent HER2 gene and protein assessment for the prognosis of HER2 negative invasive breast cancer patients
    Kurozumi, Sasagu
    Padilla, Mary
    Kurosumi, Masafumi
    Matsumoto, Hiroshi
    Inoue, Kenichi
    Horiguchi, Jun
    Takeyoshi, Izumi
    Oyama, Tetsunari
    Ranger-Moore, Jim
    Allred, D. Craig
    Dennis, Eslie
    Nitta, Hiroaki
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 158 (01) : 99 - 111