Research subjects/research subjections: Exploring the ethics and politics of critical research

被引:58
作者
Wray-Bliss, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salford, Sch Management, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England
关键词
Critical Management Studies; ethics; methodology; power;
D O I
10.1177/1350508403010002007
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
I use this paper to reflect upon the ethics and politics of Critical Management Studies (CMS) research. I highlight a potential for problematic power relations in CMS and, drawing upon Foucault's (1976) five methodological precautions' for analysing power, I explore these power relations as an effect of the micro-constitution of `subordinate' and `superior' subject positions within the research process. Through detailed analysis of a research interview transcript 1 illustrate how the researched's `subordinate' and researcher's `superior' subject positions may be constructed as an outcome of normal and well-intentioned CMS research.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 325
页数:19
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
AALVESSON M, 2003, IN PRESS ACAD MANAGE, V28
[2]  
ALFEROFF C, 2001, 2 INT CRIT MAN STUD
[3]  
Alvesson M., 1992, CRITICAL MANAGEMENT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, FINAL FOUCAULT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PSYCHIC LIFE POWER T, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781503616295
[6]  
Chakravorty Spivak Gayatri, 1990, POSTCOLONIAL CRITIC
[7]  
COLLINS H, 2000, 15 ANN ERU C CARD BU
[8]  
COLLINS H, 2000, 18 ANN INT LAB PROC
[9]   A response to wray-bliss: Revisiting the shopfloor [J].
Collinson, DL .
ORGANIZATION, 2002, 9 (01) :41-50
[10]  
DOOLIN B, 2001, 2 INT CRIT MAN STUD