Energy layer optimization via energy matrix regularization for proton spot-scanning arc therapy

被引:26
|
作者
Zhang, Gezhi [1 ]
Shen, Haozheng [1 ]
Lin, Yuting [2 ]
Chen, Ronald C. [2 ]
Long, Yong [1 ]
Gao, Hao [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Univ Michigan Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ Joint Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kansas City, MO USA
关键词
energy layer optimization; IMPT; SPArc; DELIVERY-EFFICIENT; SPARC THERAPY; ALGORITHM; ROBUST; HEAD;
D O I
10.1002/mp.15836
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Spot-scanning arc therapy (SPArc) is an emerging proton modality that can potentially offer a combination of advantages in plan quality and delivery efficiency, compared with traditional IMPT of a few beam angles. Unlike IMPT, frequent low-to-high energy layer switching (so called switch-up (SU)) can degrade delivery efficiency for SPArc. However, it is a tradeoff between the minimization of SU times and the optimization of plan quality. This work will consider the energy layer optimization (ELO) problem for SPArc and develop a new ELO method via energy matrix (EM) regularization to improve plan quality and delivery efficiency. Methods The major innovation of EM method for ELO is to design an EM that encourages desirable energy-layer map with minimal SU during SPArc, and then incorporate this EM into the SPArc treatment planning to simultaneously minimize the number of SU and optimize plan quality. The EM method is solved by the fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm and validated in comparison with a state-of-the-art method, so-called energy sequencing (ES). Results EM is validated and compared with ES using representative clinical cases. In terms of delivery efficiency, EM had fewer SU than ES with an average of 35% reduction of SU. In terms of plan quality, compared with ES, EM had smaller optimization objective values and better target dose conformality, and generally lower dose to organs-at-risk and lower integral dose to body. In terms of computational efficiency, EM was substantially more efficient than ES by at least 10-fold. Conclusion We have developed a new ELO method for SPArc using EM regularization and shown that this new method EM can improve both delivery efficiency and plan quality, with substantially reduced computational time, compared with ES.
引用
收藏
页码:5752 / 5762
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [31] Proton arc therapy plan optimization with energy layer pre-selection driven by organ at risk sparing and delivery time
    Wuyckens, Sophie
    Janssens, Guillaume
    Vera, Macarena Chocan
    Sundstrom, Johan
    Di Perri, Dario
    Sterpin, Edmond
    Souris, Kevin
    Lee, John A.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2025, 70 (04)
  • [32] Improving spot-scanning proton therapy patient specific quality assurance with HPlusQA, a second-check dose calculation engine
    Mackin, Dennis
    Li, Yupeng
    Taylor, Michael B.
    Kerr, Matthew
    Holmes, Charles
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Poenisch, Falk
    Li, Heng
    Lii, Jim
    Amos, Richard
    Wu, Richard
    Suzuki, Kazumichi
    Gillin, Michael T.
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (12)
  • [33] Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Cao, Wenhua
    Lim, Gino
    Liao, Li
    Li, Yupeng
    Jiang, Shengpeng
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Li, Heng
    Suzuki, Kazumichi
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Gomez, Daniel
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (21) : 6341 - 6354
  • [34] A Pareto-based beam orientation optimization method for spot scanning intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Sayed, Hisham Kamal
    Herman, M. G.
    Beltran, C. J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (05) : 2049 - 2060
  • [35] Energy layer optimization strategies for intensity-modulated proton therapy of lung cancer patients
    Jensen, M. Fuglsang
    Hoffmann, L.
    Petersen, J. B. B.
    Moller, D. S.
    Alber, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (10) : 4355 - 4363
  • [36] An Analysis of Plan Robustness for Esophageal Tumors: Comparing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Plans and Spot Scanning Proton Planning
    Warren, Samantha
    Partridge, Mike
    Bolsi, Alessandra
    Lomax, Anthony J.
    Hurt, Chris
    Crosby, Thomas
    Hawkins, Maria A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (01): : 199 - 207
  • [37] Linear energy transfer incorporated intensity modulated proton therapy optimization
    Cao, Wenhua
    Khabazian, Azin
    Yepes, Pablo P.
    Lim, Gino
    Poenisch, Falk
    Grosshans, David R.
    Mohan, Radhe
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (01)
  • [38] Simultaneous optimization of mixed photon energy beams in volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Momin, Shadab
    Grafe, James
    Georgiou, Konstantinos
    Khan, Rao
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (09) : 3844 - 3863
  • [39] Sectored single-energy volumetric-modulated proton arc therapy (VPAT): A preliminary multi-disease-site concept study
    Modiri, Arezoo
    Mossahebi, Sina
    Sawant, Amit
    Chen, Shifeng
    Zhang, Baoshe
    Yi, Byongyong
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 127
  • [40] The LET enhancement of energy-specific collimation in pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Smith, Blake R.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2025, 26 (01):