Energy layer optimization via energy matrix regularization for proton spot-scanning arc therapy

被引:26
|
作者
Zhang, Gezhi [1 ]
Shen, Haozheng [1 ]
Lin, Yuting [2 ]
Chen, Ronald C. [2 ]
Long, Yong [1 ]
Gao, Hao [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Univ Michigan Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ Joint Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Kansas City, MO USA
关键词
energy layer optimization; IMPT; SPArc; DELIVERY-EFFICIENT; SPARC THERAPY; ALGORITHM; ROBUST; HEAD;
D O I
10.1002/mp.15836
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Spot-scanning arc therapy (SPArc) is an emerging proton modality that can potentially offer a combination of advantages in plan quality and delivery efficiency, compared with traditional IMPT of a few beam angles. Unlike IMPT, frequent low-to-high energy layer switching (so called switch-up (SU)) can degrade delivery efficiency for SPArc. However, it is a tradeoff between the minimization of SU times and the optimization of plan quality. This work will consider the energy layer optimization (ELO) problem for SPArc and develop a new ELO method via energy matrix (EM) regularization to improve plan quality and delivery efficiency. Methods The major innovation of EM method for ELO is to design an EM that encourages desirable energy-layer map with minimal SU during SPArc, and then incorporate this EM into the SPArc treatment planning to simultaneously minimize the number of SU and optimize plan quality. The EM method is solved by the fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm and validated in comparison with a state-of-the-art method, so-called energy sequencing (ES). Results EM is validated and compared with ES using representative clinical cases. In terms of delivery efficiency, EM had fewer SU than ES with an average of 35% reduction of SU. In terms of plan quality, compared with ES, EM had smaller optimization objective values and better target dose conformality, and generally lower dose to organs-at-risk and lower integral dose to body. In terms of computational efficiency, EM was substantially more efficient than ES by at least 10-fold. Conclusion We have developed a new ELO method for SPArc using EM regularization and shown that this new method EM can improve both delivery efficiency and plan quality, with substantially reduced computational time, compared with ES.
引用
收藏
页码:5752 / 5762
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [21] A dosimetric and robustness analysis of proton arc therapy with early energy layer and spot assignment for lung cancer versus conventional intensity modulated proton therapy
    Chocan, Macarena S.
    Wuyckens, Sophie
    Dasnoy, Damien
    Di Perri, Dario
    Villarruel, Elena Borderias
    Engwall, Erik
    Lee, John A.
    Barragan-Montero, Ana M.
    Sterpin, Edmond
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2024, 63 : 805 - 815
  • [22] Redefine the Role of Spot-Scanning Proton Beam Therapy for the Single Brain Metastasis Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Chang, Sheng
    Liu, Gang
    Zhao, Lewei
    Zheng, Weili
    Yan, Di
    Chen, Peter
    Li, Xiangpan
    Yang, Kunyu
    Deraniyagala, Rohan
    Stevens, Craig
    Grills, Inga
    Chinnaiyan, Prakash
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [23] Improving dosimetric outcome for hippocampus and cochlea sparing whole brain radiotherapy using spot-scanning proton arc therapy
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    Zhou, Jun
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Blas, Kevin
    Liu, Gang
    Wang, Yinan
    Qin, An
    Chinnaiyan, Prakash
    Yan, Di
    Stevens, Craig
    Grills, Inga
    Kabolizadeh, Peyman
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2019, 58 (04) : 483 - 490
  • [24] Is proton beam therapy ready for single fraction spine SBRS? - a feasibility study to use spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy to improve the robustness and dosimetric plan quality
    Liu, Gang
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Qin, An
    Zhou, Jun
    Zheng, Weili
    Zhao, Lewei
    Han, Jun
    Zhang, Sheng
    Yan, Di
    Stevens, Craig
    Grills, Inga
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2021, 60 (05) : 653 - 657
  • [25] Improve the dosimetric outcome in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy: a feasibility study
    Liu, Gang
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Qin, An
    Zheng, Weili
    Yan, Di
    Zhang, Sheng
    Stevens, Craig
    Kabolizadeh, Peyman
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [26] Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer
    Barten, Danique L. J.
    Tol, Jim P.
    Dahele, Max
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (11) : 6589 - 6598
  • [27] The first investigation of spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) delivery time and accuracy with different delivery tolerance window settings
    Liu, Gang
    Zhao, Lewei
    Liu, Peilin
    Dao, Riao
    Qian, Yujia
    Cong, Xiaoda
    Janssens, Guillaume
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (21)
  • [28] Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients
    de Jong, Bas A.
    Battinelli, Cecilia
    Free, Jeffrey
    Wagenaar, Dirk
    Engwall, Erik
    Janssens, Guillaume
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Both, Stefan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (03) : 1305 - 1317
  • [29] The first direct method of spot sparsity optimization for proton arc therapy
    Zhao, Lewei
    You, Juntao
    Liu, Gang
    Wuyckens, Sophie
    Lu, Xiliang
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2023, 62 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [30] Efficient proton arc optimization and delivery through energy layer pre-selection and post-filtering
    Wuyckens, Sophie
    Wase, Viktor
    Marthin, Otte
    Sundstroem, Johan
    Janssens, Guillaume
    Borderias-Villarroel, Elena
    Souris, Kevin
    Sterpin, Edmond
    Engwall, Erik
    Lee, John A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (07) : 4982 - 4995