Efficacy and safety of the EMS Swiss LithoClast® Trilogy for PCNL: results of the European multicentre prospective study on behalf of European Section of UroTechnology

被引:10
作者
Thakare, N. [1 ]
Tanase, F. [2 ]
Saeb-Parsy, K. [1 ]
Atassi, N. [3 ]
Endriss, R. [3 ]
Kamphuis, G. [4 ]
Perez-Fentes, D. [5 ]
Hasan, M. [6 ]
Brehmer, M. [6 ]
Osther, P. [7 ]
Jung, H. [7 ]
Turney, B. [8 ]
Finch, W. [9 ]
Burgess, N. [9 ]
Irving, S. [9 ]
Dragos, L. [1 ]
Liatsikos, E. [10 ]
Knoll, T. [3 ]
Cauni, V [2 ]
Wiseman, O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Urol, Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, England
[2] Colentina Clin Hosp, Dept Urol, Soseaua Stefan Cel Mare 19-21, Bucharest, Romania
[3] Sindelfingen Boblingen Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Baden Baden, Germany
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Urol, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Med Ctr, NL-91105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Hosp Complex Santiago de Compostela, Dept Urol, Santiago De Compostela 15706, Spain
[6] Danderyd Hosp, Dept Urol, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Univ Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hosp, Dept Urol, Beriderbakken 4, Vejle, Denmark
[8] Churchill Hosp, Oxford OX3 7LJ, England
[9] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Urol, Norwich NR4 7UY, Norfolk, England
[10] Univ Patras, Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Patras 26500, Greece
关键词
Trilogy; LithoClast® PCNL; Lithotrite; Technology; Urolithiasis;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-021-03710-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose PCNL requires a lithotrite to efficiently break stones, and some devices include active suction to remove the fragments. We set out to determine the efficacy and safety of the Swiss LithoClast (R) Trilogy, in a prospective European multicentre evaluation and compared it to published stone clearance rates for Trilogy based on surface area (68.9 mm(2)/min) and using the 3D calculated stone volume (526.7 mm(3)/min). Methods Ten European centres participated in this prospective non-randomized study of Trilogy for PCNL. Objective measures of stone clearance rate, device malfunction, complications and stone-free rates were assessed. Each surgeon subjectively evaluated ergonomic and device effectiveness, on a 1-10 scale (10 = extremely ergonomic/effective) and compared to their usual lithotrite on a 1-10 scale (10 = extremely effective). Results One hundred and fifty seven PCNLs using Trilogy were included (53% male, 47% female; mean age 55 years, range 13-84 years). Mean stone clearance rate was 65.55 mm(2)/min or 945 mm(3)/min based on calculated 3D volume. Stone-free rate on fluoroscopy screening at the end of the procedure was 83%. Feedback for suction effectiveness was 9.0 with 9.1 for combination and 9.0 for overall effectiveness compared to lithotrite used previously. Ergonomic score was 8.1, the least satisfactory element. Complications included 13 (8.2%) Clavien-Dindo Grade II and 2 (1.3%) Grade III. Probe breakage was seen in 9 (5.7%), none required using a different lithotrite. Conclusions We have demonstrated that Trilogy is highly effective at stone removal. From a user perspective, the device was perceived by surgeons to be highly effective overall and compared to the most commonly used previous lithotrite, with an excellent safety profile.
引用
收藏
页码:4247 / 4253
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], KIDN STON SURG MAN G
  • [2] Comparison of stone elimination capacity and drilling speed of endoscopic clearance lithotripsy devices
    Bader, Markus J.
    Eisel, Maximilian
    Strittmatter, Frank
    Nagele, Udo
    Stief, Christian G.
    Pongratz, Thomas
    Sroka, Ronald
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (02) : 563 - 569
  • [3] BAUS Section of Endourology, AN PCNLS PERF JAN 1
  • [4] In Vitro Comparison of a Novel Single Probe Dual-Energy Lithotripter to Current Devices
    Carlos, Evan C.
    Wollin, Daniel A.
    Winship, Brenton B.
    Jiang, Ruiyang
    Radvak, Daniela
    Chew, Ben H.
    Gustafson, Michael R.
    Simmons, W. Neal
    Zhong, Pei
    Preminger, Glenn M.
    Lipkin, Michael E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2018, 32 (06) : 534 - 540
  • [5] Benchtop and Initial Clinical Evaluation of the ShockPulse Stone Eliminator in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
    Chew, Ben H.
    Matteliano, Andre A.
    de los Reyes, Thomas
    Lipkin, Michael E.
    Paterson, Ryan F.
    Lange, Dirk
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (02) : 191 - 197
  • [6] The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: Indications, Complications, and Outcomes in 5803 Patients
    de la Rosette, Jean
    Assimos, Dean
    Desai, Mahesh
    Gutierrez, Jorge
    Lingeman, James
    Scarpa, Roberto
    Tefekli, Ahmet
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2011, 25 (01) : 11 - 17
  • [7] Measuring stone volume - three-dimensional software reconstruction or an ellipsoid algebra formula?
    Finch, William
    Johnston, Richard
    Shaida, Nadeem
    Winterbottom, Andrew
    Wiseman, Oliver
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 (04) : 610 - 614
  • [8] Giusti G., 2019, EUR UROL SUPPL, V18, DOI [10.1016/S1569-9056(19)33724-8, DOI 10.1016/S1569-9056(19)33724-8]
  • [9] Julio C., 2020, J UROLOGY, V203, pE331
  • [10] Comparative evaluation of tissue damage induced by ultrasound and impact dual-mode endoscopic lithotripsy versus conventional single-mode ultrasound lithotripsy
    Khoder, Wael
    Strittmatter, Frank
    Alghamdi, Abdulmajeed
    Seitz, Michael
    Stief, Christian
    Bader, Markus Juergen
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (04) : 1051 - 1058