Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its legacy

被引:129
作者
Skolarikos, A
Alivizatos, G
de la Rosette, JJMCH
机构
[1] Univ Athens, Dept Urol 2, Athens, Greece
[2] AMC Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
percutaneous nephrolithotomy; indications; limitations; complications; technique;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2004.08.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: We review the indications of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL), its safety and efficacy when applied to various patient groups as well as the different points of technique, giving emphasis on new tips and ongoing debates. Methods: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE database on PNL between 1980 and 2004. Results: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) has been successfully and safely used to treat patients with renal stones for more than a quarter of a century. Still, the use of PNL in treating renal stones in different patient groups, such as children, obese patients, patients with renal congenital anomalies, patients who had previous open renal surgery and patients who have undergone renal transplantation are always of high interest. Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy seems to have a certain role in treating bilateral renal stones, especially when proficiency is achieved for unilateral PNL. Various aspects of the procedure such as patient positioning, renal access, the ideal dilating method, the type of nephrostomy tube used, as well as the actual need for drainage, have been debated. Conclusion: PNL is currently the procedure of choice for removal of large renal calculi. The need for well designed prospective randomized trials comparing PNL with alternative treatment modalities arises through the literature review. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 28
页数:7
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
AHLAWAT R, 1995, EUR UROL, V28, P116
[2]   Lower pole I: A prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis - Initial results [J].
Albala, DM ;
Assimos, DG ;
Clayman, RV ;
Denstedt, JD ;
Grasso, M ;
Gutierrez-Aceves, J ;
Kahn, RI ;
Leveillee, RJ ;
Lingeman, JE ;
Macaluso, JN ;
Munch, LC ;
Nakada, SY ;
Newman, RC ;
Pearle, MS ;
Preminger, GM ;
Teichman, J ;
Woods, JR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) :2072-2080
[3]  
ALLEN P, 1981, J UROLOGY, V125, P463
[4]   Endoscopic management of symptomatic caliceal diverticula: A retrospective comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and ureteroscopy [J].
Auge, BK ;
Munver, R ;
Kourambas, J ;
Newman, GE ;
Preminger, GM .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2002, 16 (08) :557-563
[5]   Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with or without a history of open nephrolithotomy [J].
Basiri, A ;
Karrami, H ;
Moghaddam, SMH ;
Shadpour, P .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2003, 17 (04) :213-216
[6]   PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY IN CHILDREN [J].
CALLAWAY, TW ;
LINGARDH, G ;
BASATA, S ;
SYLVEN, M .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (03) :1067-1068
[7]   Surgical management of the calyceal diverticulurn [J].
Canales, B ;
Monga, M .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2003, 13 (03) :255-260
[8]   Techniques in endourology - Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy [J].
Chan, DY ;
Jarrett, TW .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2000, 14 (03) :269-272
[9]   Effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on differential renal function as measured by mercaptoacetyl triglycine nuclear renography [J].
Chatham, JR ;
Dykes, TE ;
Kennon, WG ;
Schwartz, BF .
UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (04) :522-525
[10]  
CLAYMAN RV, 1983, RADIOLOGY, V147, P884, DOI 10.1148/radiology.147.3.6844632