Carotid Duplex Ultrasound Velocity Measurements Versus Intravascular Ultrasound in Detecting Carotid In-Stent Restenosis

被引:10
作者
Yan, Bryan P. [1 ,2 ]
Clark, David J. [3 ]
Jaff, Michael R. [1 ]
Kiernan, Thomas J. [1 ]
Schainfeld, Robert M. [1 ]
Lessio, Sara [4 ]
Rosenfield, Kenneth [1 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Cardiol, Sect Vasc Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Med & Therapeut, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Austin Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Melbourne, Vic 3084, Australia
[4] St Elizabeths Med Ctr, Div Cardiovasc Med & Res, Boston, MA USA
关键词
carotid artery stenting; in-stent restenosis; duplex ultrasonography; intravascular ultrasound; restenosis; FOLLOW-UP; ARTERY; CRITERIA; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.857276
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Duplex ultrasonography criteria for assessing the severity of carotid artery (CA) in-stent restenosis are not well established. Methods and Results-We analyzed 39 patients (40 CAs) who underwent CA stenting with baseline and 6-month follow-up carotid duplex ultrasonography and intravascular ultrasound. Intravascular ultrasound measurements included minimum luminal diameter, percent diameter, and lumen area stenosis. Duplex ultrasonography measurements included peak systolic velocity (PSV), percentage change in PSV, end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and internal-to-common CA PSV ratio (ICA/CCA). Receiver operating characteristic curves assessed each duplex measurement to detect >= 50% diameter, >= 75% lumen area stenosis, and minimum luminal diameter < 3 mm at follow-up. At 6-month intravascular ultrasound follow-up, >= 50% diameter and >= 75% lumen area CA in-stent restenosis occurred in 20% and 25%, respectively; minimum luminal diameter < 3 cm occurred in 48%. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves for PSV, EDV, and ICA/CCA were 0.85, 0.96, and 0.89 for >= 50% diameter stenosis and 0.89, 0.93, and 0.88 for >= 75% lumen area stenosis, respectively. Optimal PSV, EDV, and ICA/CCA criteria to detect >= 50% diameter and >= 75% lumen area CA in-stent restenosis were greater compared with those for native CA. A > 98% increase in PSV had the highest specificity, whereas the combination of EDV > 41 cm/s and ICA/CCA > 2 had the highest sensitivity in detecting >= 75% lumen area CA in-stent restenosis. Conclusions-PSV, EDV, and ICA/CCA PSV ratio were good discriminators for detecting significant diameter and lumen area greater compared with those for native CA. The combination of duplex velocity criteria increases diagnostic accuracy. (Circ Cardiovasc Intervent. 2009;2:438-443.)
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 443
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Ultrasound velocity criteria for carotid in-stent restenosis
    Chi, Yung-Wei
    White, Christopher J.
    Woods, T. Cooper
    Goldman, Corey K.
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2007, 69 (03) : 349 - 354
  • [2] Safety and utility of intravascular ultrasound-guided carotid artery stenting
    Clark, DJ
    Lessio, S
    O'Donoghue, M
    Schainfeld, R
    Rosenfield, K
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2004, 63 (03) : 355 - 362
  • [3] COLOR-FLOW DUPLEX SCANNING OF CAROTID ARTERIES - NEW VELOCITY CRITERIA-BASED ON RECEIVER OPERATOR CHARACTERISTIC ANALYSIS FOR THRESHOLD STENOSES USED IN THE SYMPTOMATIC AND ASYMPTOMATIC CAROTID TRIALS
    FAUGHT, WE
    MATTOS, MA
    VANBEMMELEN, PS
    HODGSON, KJ
    BARKMEIER, LD
    RAMSEY, DE
    SUMNER, DS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1994, 19 (05) : 818 - 828
  • [4] FAUGHT WE, 1994, J VASC SURG, V19, P827
  • [5] Grant Edward G, 2003, Ultrasound Q, V19, P190, DOI 10.1097/00013644-200312000-00005
  • [6] Sensitivity and specificity of color duplex ultrasound measurement in the estimation of internal carotid artery stenosis:: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jahromi, AS
    Cinà, CS
    Liu, Y
    Clase, CM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 41 (06) : 962 - 972
  • [7] Duplex ultrasound criteria for the identification of carotid stenosis should be laboratory specific
    Kuntz, KM
    Polak, JF
    Whittemore, AD
    Skillman, JJ
    Kent, KC
    [J]. STROKE, 1997, 28 (03) : 597 - 602
  • [8] Carotid artery stenting:: Is there a need to revise ultrasound velocity criteria?
    Lal, BK
    Hobson, RW
    Goldstein, J
    Chakhtoura, EY
    Durán, WN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 39 (01) : 58 - 66
  • [9] Duplex ultrasound velocity criteria for the stented carotid artery
    Lal, Brajesh K.
    Hobson, Robert W., II
    Tofighi, Babak
    Kapadia, Indu
    Cuadra, Salvador
    Jamil, Zafar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 47 (01) : 63 - 73
  • [10] Patterns of in-stent restenosis after carotid artery stenting: Classification and implications for longterm outcome
    Lal, Brajesh K.
    Kaperonis, Elias A.
    Cuadra, Salvador
    Kapadia, Indravadan
    Hobson, Robert W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 46 (05) : 833 - 840