Femoral impaction allografting for significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty

被引:6
|
作者
Goff, Thomas A. J. [1 ]
Bobak, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Leeds Gen Infirm, Acad Dept Trauma & Orthopaed, Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
Arthroplasty; Hip; Impaction bone allograft; Osteolysis; Reoperation; Replacement; FOLLOW-UP; MORSELIZED ALLOGRAFT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; POLISHED STEM; EXETER STEM; COMPONENT REVISION; CEMENT MANTLE; TAPERED STEM; REPLACEMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.5301/hipint.5000438
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Femoral impaction bone allografting in revision hip arthroplasty facilitates physiological reconstruction with restoration of bone stock, allowing implantation of a standard cemented femoral component. The purpose of this study was to report our experience in femoral component revision arthroplasty with impaction morsellised cancellous bone allograft using custom impactors and a cemented triple-taper polished stem. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all cases of femoral component revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafting undertaken by a single surgeon from 2005 to 2011. Outcome measures included radiographic analysis of stem subsidence over time, graft remodelling and incorporation, and clinical progress. Results: We reviewed 47 consecutive hips in 44 patients, mean age 62 years (37-88). Femoral impaction with allograft was performed as either single stage (41 cases) or 2-stage (6 cases) procedures. All patients received a cemented C-stem prosthesis. The mean follow-up period was 5.1 (1.3-9.4) years. The median preoperative bone defect score was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-3) using the Endo-Klinik classification. Radiological evidence of graft incorporation was observed in 89% (281 of 315 zones) with additional remodelling observed in 33% (103 of 315 zones). The median stem subsidence at 1-year follow-up was 1.1 mm (standard deviation [SD] 1.24 mm, range 0-6 mm). The median Oxford Hip Score at the most recent follow-up was 36.5. To date no femoral component has undergone further revision. Conclusions: Encouraging results have been obtained with this technique for the treatment of significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty, allowing implantation of a standard prosthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 285
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biological acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting and an acetabular reconstruction ring
    Friedrich, M. J.
    Gravius, S.
    Schmolders, J.
    Wimmer, M. D.
    Wirtz, D. C.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2014, 26 (02): : 126 - 140
  • [42] Biological acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting and an acetabular reconstruction ring
    Friedrich, M. J.
    Gravius, S.
    Schmolders, J.
    Wimmer, M. D.
    Wirtz, D. C.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2014, 26 (02): : 126 - 140
  • [43] Revision total hip arthroplasty with proximal bone loss
    Murphy, SB
    Rodriguez, J
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2004, 19 (04) : 115 - 119
  • [44] Both Acetabular and Femoral Reconstructions With Impaction Bone Grafting in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Case Series and Literature Review
    Xiong, Liang
    Li, Hui
    Huang, Xianzhe
    Jie, Shuo
    Zhu, Weihong
    Pan, Jiankang
    Wu, Xiaoxin
    Mao, Xinzhan
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2023, 24
  • [45] The use of hardened bone cement as an impaction grafting extender for revision hip arthroplasty
    Ruddy, Mark
    FitzPatrick, David P.
    Stanton, Kenneth T.
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2018, 78 : 82 - 90
  • [46] Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Evaluation and Management
    Sheth, Neil P.
    Nelson, Charles L.
    Springer, Bryan D.
    Fehring, Thomas K.
    Paprosky, Wayne G.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2013, 21 (03) : 128 - 139
  • [47] Large femoral bone loss after hip revision using the uncemented proximally porous-coated Bi-Metric prosthesis
    Adolphson, Per Y.
    Salemyr, Mats O. F.
    Skoldenberg, Olof G.
    Boden, Henrik S. G.
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2009, 80 (01) : 14 - 19
  • [48] Revision hip arthroplasty by Waldemar Link custom-made total hip prosthesis
    Medenica, Ivica
    Lukovic, Milan
    Radoicic, Dragan
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2010, 67 (02) : 179 - 182
  • [49] Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant
    Wimmer, Matthias D.
    Randau, Thomas M.
    Deml, Moritz C.
    Ascherl, Rudolf
    Noeth, Ulrich
    Forst, Raimund
    Gravius, Nadine
    Wirtz, Dieter
    Gravius, Sascha
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2013, 14
  • [50] Long-term clinical outcomes following the use of synthetic hydroxyapatite and bone graft in impaction in revision hip arthroplasty
    Aulakh, Tajeshwar S.
    Jayasekera, Narlaka
    Kuiper, Jan-Herman
    Richardson, James B.
    BIOMATERIALS, 2009, 30 (09) : 1732 - 1738