The feasibility and safety of early discharge for low risk patients with acute myocardial infarction after successful direct percutaneous coronary intervention

被引:12
|
作者
Yip, HK
Wu, CJ
Chang, HW
Hang, CL
Wang, CP
Yang, CH
Hung, WC
Yu, TH
Yeh, KH
Chua, S
Fu, M
Chen, MC
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Cardiol, Dept Internal Med, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
[2] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Sci Biol, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
来源
JAPANESE HEART JOURNAL | 2003年 / 44卷 / 01期
关键词
acute myocardial infarction; direct percutaneous coronary intervention; early discharge; low risk patients;
D O I
10.1536/jhj.44.41
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
There is a lack of consensus among cardiologists regarding the length of time patients should be hospitalized after an uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and successful direct percutaneous coronary intervention (d-PCI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of early discharge (discharge <4 days after the procedure) for low risk patients with AMI who underwent successful d-PCI. From May 1996 through December 2001, d-PCI was performed in 898 consecutive patients with AMI Of these 898 patients, 463 (51.6%) were stratified to be at low risk. Lower risk was defined as: (1) Killip classification less than or equal to2 on admission; (2) the infarct-related artery achieved normal blood flow without recurrent ischemia or reinfarction in the first 24 hours; (3) no mechanical or electrical complications after d-PCI, (4) no acute renal failure, acute stroke, or major bleeding cornplication; (5) no advanced congestive heart failure (defined asgreater than or equal toNew York Heart Association functional class 3); and (6) no sepsis. Patients who were discharged <4 days after undergoing the procedure were enrolled in group 1 (n=266). Patients who were discharged >= 4 days after undergoing the procedure were enrolled in group 2 (n=197). Univariate analysis demonstrated that group 2 patients had a significantly longer hospital stay (P=0.0001) than group I patients. At the first 30-day follow-up examination, there were no significant differences in the combined major cardiac events (death, recurrent ischemia, reinfarction, revascularization, or advanced congestive heart failure) between the group I and group 2 patients (1.50% vs 1.52%, P=0.92). There were also no significant differences in the combined major noncardiac complications (acute stroke, acute renal failure, bleeding complications requiring blood transfusion, vascular sequelae, or sepsis) between the group I and group 2 patients (1.13% vs 0.51%, P=0.89). Early discharge was feasible in a majority of the patients who experienced AMI and were at lower risk 24 hours after successful d-PCI. Thus, the patients had a shortened hospital stay and no increased risk.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 49
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction in patients with acute myocardial infarction after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective study
    Gu, Jun-Jie
    Tong, Xiao-Shan
    Meng, Sha-Sha
    Xu, Shu-Hui
    Huang, Jin-Yan
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [42] Percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with mitral regurgitation
    Tu, Yan
    Zeng, Qing-Chun
    Huang, Ying
    Li, Jian-Yong
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (06) : 521 - 527
  • [43] Effect of the combined use of ivabradine and metoprolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction early after percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled study
    He, Ruiqing
    Li, Lingyan
    Han, Chao
    An, Wen
    Liu, Zongjun
    Gao, Junqing
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (13)
  • [44] Effect of early home-based exercise for cardiac rehabilitation on the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention
    Yu, Huaqin
    Yang, Honger
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 13 (07): : 7839 - 7847
  • [45] Early Discharge in Low-Risk Patients Hospitalized for Acute Coronary Syndromes: Feasibility, Safety and Reasons for Prolonged Length of Stay
    Laurencet, Marie-Eva
    Girardin, Francois
    Rigamonti, Fabio
    Bevand, Anne
    Meyer, Philippe
    Carballo, David
    Roffi, Marco
    Noble, Stephane
    Mach, Francois
    Gencer, Baris
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08):
  • [46] Process Factors Affecting Door to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients
    Horst, Michael A.
    Stuart, Jennifer J.
    McKinsey, Nichole
    Gambler, Angela S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2012, 27 (01) : 16 - 20
  • [47] Selection of percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction in tertiary hospital
    Chen, Liwei
    Han, Ling
    Luo, Jingguang
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (29)
  • [48] Late Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated with Better Prognosis of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Dong, Hao
    Li, Xuan
    Xiao, Dongping
    Tang, Yong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2022, 15 : 2621 - 2627
  • [49] Effects of bivalirudin on acute myocardial infarction in patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention
    孙学玉
    张玉英
    韩增雷
    SouthChinaJournalofCardiology, 2018, 19 (04) : 237 - 243
  • [50] Prognostic implications of chronic kidney disease and anemia after percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction patients
    Matsue, Yuya
    Matsumura, Akihiko
    Abe, Masami
    Ono, Maki
    Seya, Mie
    Nakamura, Tomofumi
    Iwatsuka, Ryota
    Mizukami, Akira
    Setoguchi, Masahiko
    Nagahori, Wataru
    Ohno, Masakazu
    Suzuki, Makoto
    Hashimoto, Yuji
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2013, 28 (01) : 19 - 26