Coverage-Guaranteed Sensor Node Deployment Strategies for Wireless Sensor Networks

被引:30
作者
Fan, Gaojuan [1 ]
Wang, Ruchuan [1 ]
Huang, Haiping [1 ]
Sun, Lijuan [1 ]
Sha, Chao [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Coll Comp, Nanjing 210003, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
wireless sensor networks; coverage; desired deployment quality; deployment strategies; CONNECTIVITY; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/s100302064
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Deployment quality and cost are two conflicting aspects in wireless sensor networks. Random deployment, where the monitored field is covered by randomly and uniformly deployed sensor nodes, is an appropriate approach for large-scale network applications. However, their successful applications depend considerably on the deployment quality that uses the minimum number of sensors to achieve a desired coverage. Currently, the number of sensors required to meet the desired coverage is based on asymptotic analysis, which cannot meet deployment quality due to coverage overestimation in real applications. In this paper, we first investigate the coverage overestimation and address the challenge of designing coverage-guaranteed deployment strategies. To overcome this problem, we propose two deployment strategies, namely, the Expected-area Coverage Deployment (ECD) and BOundary Assistant Deployment (BOAD). The deployment quality of the two strategies is analyzed mathematically. Under the analysis, a lower bound on the number of deployed sensor nodes is given to satisfy the desired deployment quality. We justify the correctness of our analysis through rigorous proof, and validate the effectiveness of the two strategies through extensive simulation experiments. The simulation results show that both strategies alleviate the coverage overestimation significantly. In addition, we also evaluate two proposed strategies in the context of target detection application. The comparison results demonstrate that if the target appears at the boundary of monitored region in a given random deployment, the average intrusion distance of BOAD is considerably shorter than that of ECD with the same desired deployment quality. In contrast, ECD has better performance in terms of the average intrusion distance when the invasion of intruder is from the inside of monitored region.
引用
收藏
页码:2064 / 2087
页数:24
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Adlakha S, 2003, IEEE WCNC, P1615
[2]   Random vs. Deterministic Deployment of Sensors in the Presence of Failures and Placement Errors [J].
Balister, Paul ;
Kumar, Santosh .
IEEE INFOCOM 2009 - IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, VOLS 1-5, 2009, :2896-2900
[3]  
Cao Q, 2005, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3560, P276
[4]   Coverage-adaptive random sensor scheduling for application-aware data gathering in wireless sensor networks [J].
Choi, Wook ;
Das, Sajal K. .
COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2006, 29 (17) :3467-3482
[5]   Relocating sensor nodes to maximize cumulative connected coverage in wireless sensor networks [J].
Coskun, Vedat .
SENSORS, 2008, 8 (04) :2792-2817
[6]  
Ghosh A, 2004, C LOCAL COMPUT NETW, P68
[7]  
Hall P, 1988, Introduction to the theory of coverage processes
[8]  
HOFFMAN F, 1991, PROCEEDINGS - 32ND ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, P39, DOI 10.1109/SFCS.1991.185346
[9]   Random Scheduling for Wireless Sensor Networks [J].
Jiang, Jie ;
Fang, Li ;
Wen, Jun ;
Wu, Guofu ;
Zhang, Heying .
2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING WITH APPLICATIONS, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, :324-332
[10]   Sensor Placement for Fault Diagnosis [J].
Krysander, Mattias ;
Frisk, Erik .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2008, 38 (06) :1398-1410