Paracetamol as a prophylactic analgesic for hysterosalpingography: A double blind randomized controlled trial

被引:26
|
作者
Elson, EM [1 ]
Ridley, NTF [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwick Pk & St Marks Hosp, Dept Radiol, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
关键词
analgesia; hysterosalpinogogram; paracetamol;
D O I
10.1053/crad.2000.0563
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of paracetamol as a prophylactic analgesic for hysterosalpingography (HSG). DESIGN: A prospective double blind randomized controlled trial comparing one 1 g of paracetamol (SmithKline Beecham, Brentford, U.K.) to placebo taken 30 min before HSG. One hundred consecutive out-patients were studied prospectively, The analgesic effectiveness during the procedure and at 24 h and 1 week post procedure was analysed by a postal pain score questionnaire, Additional data on the ethnicity of the patient, sex and level of experience of the radiologist performing the hysterosalpingogram, the parity of the patient, the ease of the procedure, and whether pathology was Identified were also recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients (88%) replied, 39 (44%) received paracetamol and 39 placebo (56%), During the procedure 3/39 (7%) of women in the paracetamol group were pain-fret compared to 9/49 (18%) in the placebo group, which was not significant (P = 0.11). At 24 h, 15/39 (38%) of women in the paracetamol group were pain-free compared to 20/49 (41%) in the placebo group, which was not significant (P = 0.82), At 1 week, 27/39 (69%) of women in the paracetamol group were pain-free compared to 29/49 (59%) in the placebo group, which was not significant (P = 0.33). No significant difference in mean pain stores was determined during the procedure (P = 0.91), or at 24 h post procedure (P = 0.94). Similarly, no difference in mean pain scores was identified with regard to the ethnicity of the patient, the sex of the radiologist performing the procedure, the level of experience of the radiologist performing the procedure, or whether pathology was present or not. Difficult cannulations were associated with higher mean pain scores, however, there was no difference in mean pain scores between the paracetamol or placebo groups for both easy and difficult cannulations. CONCLUSION: Paracetamol is not effective as a prophylactic analgesic for HSG. If a prophylactic analgesic is considered necessary for pain relief during HSG we recommend that a non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drug: (NSAID) is used. (C) 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 678
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of Epidural Analgesic Paste Components in Lumbar Decompressive Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial
    Diaz, Roberto Jose
    Myles, S. Terry
    Hurlbert, R. John
    NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 70 (02) : 414 - 423
  • [32] PROPHYLACTIC SULFAMETHOXAZOLE AND TRIMETHOPRIM IN VENTRICULOPERITONEAL SHUNT SURGERY - A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL
    WANG, EEL
    PROBER, CG
    HENDRICK, BE
    HOFFMAN, HJ
    HUMPHREYS, RP
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1984, 251 (09): : 1174 - 1177
  • [33] Prophylactic fenoldopam for renal protection in sepsis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial
    Morelli, A
    Ricci, Z
    Bellomo, R
    Ronco, C
    Rocco, M
    Conti, G
    De Gaetano, A
    Picchini, U
    Orecchioni, A
    Portieri, M
    Coluzzi, F
    Porzi, P
    Serio, P
    Bruno, A
    Pietropaoli, P
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (11) : 2451 - 2456
  • [34] The Nordic multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial of prophylactic ursodeoxycholic acid in liver transplant patients
    Keiding, S
    Hockerstedt, K
    Bjoro, K
    Bondesen, S
    Hjortrup, A
    Isoniemi, H
    Erichsen, C
    Soderdahl, G
    Ericzon, BG
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 63 (11) : 1591 - 1594
  • [35] Opioid-Sparing Effect of Intravenous Paracetamol After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Maghsoudi, Robab
    Tabatabai, Meghdad
    Radfar, Mohammad Hadi
    Movasagi, Gholamreza
    Etemadian, Masoud
    Shati, Mohsen
    Amjadi, Mohsen
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (01) : 23 - 27
  • [36] Lidocaine Plus Morphine Versus Lidocaine Plus Paracetamol for Bier Block: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
    Rafiei, Mohamadreza
    Afsahi, Mohamad
    Karbalaeikhani, Ali
    Kheradmand, Behroz
    Hazrati, Ebrahim
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2022, 37 (03) : 380 - 385
  • [37] Comparison of the relative analgesic efficacy of lysine acetylsalicylate and paracetamol: A randomized double-blind study in adults
    Cabane, J
    Festino, C
    Combier, BL
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 1996, 25 (30): : 1367 - 1371
  • [38] A randomized, double blind trial of prophylactic fibrinogen to reduce bleeding in cardiac surgery
    Sadeghi, Mostafa
    Atefyekta, Reza
    Azimaraghi, Omid
    Marashi, Seyed Mojtaba
    Aghajani, Yasaman
    Ghadimi, Fatemeh
    Spahn, Donat R.
    Movafegh, Ali
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2014, 64 (04): : 253 - 257
  • [39] Paracetamol versus paracetamol/tramadol in postoperative intertrochanteric fracture: A noninferiority, randomized, controlled, double-blind study
    Sirithiantong, Todsaporn
    Chuekitkumchorn, Sittha
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 31 (01)
  • [40] Difficulties in recruitment for a randomized controlled trial involving hysterosalpingography
    Perquin D.A.M.
    De Craen A.J.M.
    Helmerhorst F.M.
    Reproductive Health, 3 (1)