Paracetamol as a prophylactic analgesic for hysterosalpingography: A double blind randomized controlled trial

被引:26
|
作者
Elson, EM [1 ]
Ridley, NTF [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwick Pk & St Marks Hosp, Dept Radiol, Harrow HA1 3UJ, Middx, England
关键词
analgesia; hysterosalpinogogram; paracetamol;
D O I
10.1053/crad.2000.0563
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of paracetamol as a prophylactic analgesic for hysterosalpingography (HSG). DESIGN: A prospective double blind randomized controlled trial comparing one 1 g of paracetamol (SmithKline Beecham, Brentford, U.K.) to placebo taken 30 min before HSG. One hundred consecutive out-patients were studied prospectively, The analgesic effectiveness during the procedure and at 24 h and 1 week post procedure was analysed by a postal pain score questionnaire, Additional data on the ethnicity of the patient, sex and level of experience of the radiologist performing the hysterosalpingogram, the parity of the patient, the ease of the procedure, and whether pathology was Identified were also recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients (88%) replied, 39 (44%) received paracetamol and 39 placebo (56%), During the procedure 3/39 (7%) of women in the paracetamol group were pain-fret compared to 9/49 (18%) in the placebo group, which was not significant (P = 0.11). At 24 h, 15/39 (38%) of women in the paracetamol group were pain-free compared to 20/49 (41%) in the placebo group, which was not significant (P = 0.82), At 1 week, 27/39 (69%) of women in the paracetamol group were pain-free compared to 29/49 (59%) in the placebo group, which was not significant (P = 0.33). No significant difference in mean pain stores was determined during the procedure (P = 0.91), or at 24 h post procedure (P = 0.94). Similarly, no difference in mean pain scores was identified with regard to the ethnicity of the patient, the sex of the radiologist performing the procedure, the level of experience of the radiologist performing the procedure, or whether pathology was present or not. Difficult cannulations were associated with higher mean pain scores, however, there was no difference in mean pain scores between the paracetamol or placebo groups for both easy and difficult cannulations. CONCLUSION: Paracetamol is not effective as a prophylactic analgesic for HSG. If a prophylactic analgesic is considered necessary for pain relief during HSG we recommend that a non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drug: (NSAID) is used. (C) 2000 The Royal College of Radiologists.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 678
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prophylactic fluconazole in liver transplant recipients - A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Winston, DJ
    Pakrasi, A
    Busuttil, RW
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 131 (10) : 729 - +
  • [22] Opioid analgesia for hysterosalpingography: Controlled double-blind prospective trial with remifentanil and placebo
    Cengiz, Mustafa
    Kafali, Hasan
    Artuc, Hulya
    Baysal, Zeynep
    GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2006, 62 (03) : 168 - 172
  • [23] Intravenous paracetamol as adjunctive treatment for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a double blind randomized controlled trial
    Cattabriga, Iolter
    Pacini, Davide
    Lamazza, Gaia
    Talarico, Francesco
    Di Bartolomeo, Roberto
    Grillone, Giovanni
    Bacchi-Reggiani, Letizia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2007, 32 (03) : 527 - 531
  • [24] The Effect of Flurbiprofen as Prophylactic Analgesic before Hysterosalpingography
    Guzel, A. I.
    Kuyumcuoglu, U.
    Erdemoglu, M.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 38 (05) : 1780 - 1784
  • [25] Sacolene in cholera: A double blind randomized controlled trial
    Patra, FC
    Majumder, RN
    Eeckels, R
    Desjeux, JF
    Mahalanabis, D
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 31 (02) : 151 - 154
  • [26] Oil-based or saline contrast for sono-hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a pilot randomized controlled double blind trial
    Legro, Richard S.
    Stetter, Christy M.
    Kunselman, Allen R.
    Geisler, William M.
    Dodson, William C.
    Estes, Stephanie J.
    F&S REPORTS, 2023, 4 (01): : 121 - 126
  • [27] The brain signature of paracetamol in healthy volunteers: a double-blind randomized trial
    Pickering, Gisele
    Kastler, Adrian
    Macian, Nicolas
    Pereira, Bruno
    Valabregue, Romain
    Lehericy, Stephane
    Boyer, Louis
    Dubray, Claude
    Jean, Betty
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2015, 9 : 3853 - 3862
  • [28] Analgesic effect of gabapentin premedication in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Gregg, AK
    Francis, S
    Sharpe, P
    Rowbotham, DJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (01) : 174P - 174P
  • [29] The median local analgesic dose of intrathecal bupivacaine with hydromorphone for labour: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Mhyre, Jill M.
    Hong, Richard W.
    Greenfield, Mary Lou V. H.
    Pace, Nathan L.
    Polley, Linda S.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2013, 60 (11): : 1061 - 1069
  • [30] Analgesic use for carbon monoxide poisoning induced headache: A randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial
    Kocak, Abdullah Osman
    Akbas, Ilker
    TROPICAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 18 (10) : 2203 - 2209