Internal embeddedness of business group affiliates and innovation performance: Evidence from China

被引:7
|
作者
Zheng, Li [1 ]
Ma, Pengcheng [2 ]
Hong, Jacky Fok Loi [3 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Sch Business, 308 Ningxia Rd, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Management, Bldg 26, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[3] Univ Macau, Fac Business Adm, Ave Univ, Taipa, Macao, Peoples R China
关键词
Business groups; Directorate embeddedness; Capital embeddedness; Innovation performance; Internal embeddedness; KNOWLEDGE CREATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; FAMILY BUSINESS; RELATIONAL EMBEDDEDNESS; PYRAMIDAL OWNERSHIP; PARTY TRANSACTIONS; DUAL EMBEDDEDNESS; CAPITAL-MARKETS; IMPACT; MNC;
D O I
10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102494
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Existing research on the relationship between internal embeddedness and the innovation performance of business group affiliates reports mixed results. We adopt embeddedness theory to identify two distinct characteristics of internal embeddedness, namely directorate embeddedness and capital embeddedness, and their respective impacts on business group affiliates' innovation performance. Based on a sample of listed affiliates in China from 2009 to 2018, our empirical results show that directorate embeddedness is positively related to the innovation performance of affiliates, whereas capital embeddedness has an inverted U-shaped effect. Furthermore, the pyramidal control layers of business groups attenuate the positive relationship between directorate embeddedness and the innovation performance of affiliates, and similar pyramidal control layers abate the inverted Ushaped relationship between capital embeddedness and innovation performance. Our findings highlight the distinctive characteristics of internal embeddedness and provide new insights into an organizational structure that drives business group affiliates' innovation performance in a key emerging market.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The impact of business group affiliation on performance: evidence from China's 'national champions'
    Guest, Paul
    Sutherland, Dylan
    CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2010, 34 (04) : 617 - 631
  • [22] Green supply chain behavior and business performance: Evidence from China
    Li, Guangqin
    Shao, Shuai
    Zhang, Lihong
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 144 : 445 - 455
  • [23] Partners' centrality diversity and firm innovation performance: Evidence from China
    Jiang, Yusi
    Yang, Yi
    Zhao, Yapu
    Li, Yuan
    INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 88 : 22 - 34
  • [24] Technological innovation and environmental performance: evidence from China
    Wu, Yuying
    Zhang, Min
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2024, 124 (05) : 1746 - 1768
  • [25] BUSINESS GROUP AFFILIATION, INNOVATION, INTERNATIONALIZATION, AND PERFORMANCE: A SEMIPARAMETRIC ANALYSIS
    Iona, Alfonsina
    Leonida, Leone
    Navarra, Pietro
    GLOBAL STRATEGY JOURNAL, 2013, 3 (03) : 244 - 261
  • [26] Business group and analyst earnings forecast: evidence from China
    Han, Jie
    Liu, Chang
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2024, 31 (04) : 560 - 585
  • [27] Do internationalizing business group affiliates perform better after promarket reforms? Evidence from Korean SMEs
    Shin, Joonho
    Mendoza, Xavier
    Choi, Changbum
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2022, 39 (02) : 805 - 841
  • [28] Does Business Group Affiliation Matter for Superior Performance? Evidence from Pakistan
    Ahmad, Ishtiaq
    Olah, Judit
    Popp, Jozsef
    Mate, Domician
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [29] Financial performance feedback, institutional ownership and green innovation: evidence from China
    Yang, Jiayi
    Chen, Xiafei
    CHINESE MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2024, 18 (02) : 526 - 549
  • [30] Research on the Impact of Network Embeddedness on Enterprise Innovation Performance - Based on the Mediating Role of Business Model Innovation and the Moderating Role of Competition Intensity
    Tian, Qingfeng
    Li, Guoqing
    Xu, Rui
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEE IEEM21), 2021, : 1047 - 1051