E2F6 is essential for cell viability in breast cancer cells during replication stress

被引:8
作者
Lafta, Inam Jasim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Baghdad, Coll Vet Med, Dept Microbiol, Baghdad, Iraq
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Breast cancer; E2F6; replication stress; oncogene; GENE-EXPRESSION; TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVATION; FAMILY-MEMBER; PROLIFERATION; REPRESSION; PROTEIN; ROLES; BRCA1; DIFFERENTIATION; COMPLEX;
D O I
10.3906/biy-1905-6
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
E2F6 is a member of the E2F family of transcription factors involved in regulation of a wide variety of genes through both activation and repression. E2F6 has been reported as overexpressed in breast cancers but whether or not this is important for tumor development is unclear. We first checked E2F6 expression in tumor cDNAs and the protein level in a range of breast cancer cell lines. RNA interference-mediated depletion was then used to assess the importance of E2F6 expression in cell lines with regard to cell cycle profile using fluorescence-activated cell sorting and a cell survival assay using (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT). The overexpression of E2F6 was confirmed in breast tumor cDNA samples and breast cancer cell lines. Depletion of E2F6 in the breast cancer cells reduced cell viability in MCF-7, T-47D, and MDA-MB-231 cells. There was little effect in the nontumor breast cell line MCF-10A. The deleterious effect on cancer cells was greater during replication stress, leading to an increase in the proportion of breast cancer cells with sub-G1 DNA content. These results suggest that E2F6 might be essential for the survival of breast cancer cells experiencing replication stress, and therefore it could be a target for combined therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] A novel repressive E2F6 complex containing the polycomb group protein, EPC1, that interacts with EZH2 in a proliferation-specific manner
    Attwooll, C
    Oddi, S
    Cartwright, P
    Prosperini, E
    Agger, K
    Steensgaard, P
    Wagener, C
    Sardet, C
    Moroni, MC
    Helin, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 280 (02) : 1199 - 1208
  • [2] The E2F family: specific functions and overlapping interests
    Attwooll, C
    Denchi, EL
    Helin, K
    [J]. EMBO JOURNAL, 2004, 23 (24) : 4709 - 4716
  • [3] Sustained E2F-Dependent Transcription Is a Key Mechanism to Prevent Replication-Stress-Induced DNA Damage
    Bertoli, Cosetta
    Herlihy, Anna E.
    Pennycook, Betheney R.
    Kriston-Vizi, Janos
    de Bruin, Robertus A. M.
    [J]. CELL REPORTS, 2016, 15 (07): : 1412 - 1422
  • [4] Chk1 Inhibits E2F6 Repressor Function in Response to Replication Stress to Maintain Cell-Cycle Transcription
    Bertoli, Cosetta
    Klier, Steffi
    McGowan, Clare
    Wittenberg, Curt
    de Bruin, Robertus A. M.
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (17) : 1629 - 1637
  • [5] Unbiased location analysis of E2F1-binding sites suggests a widespread role for E2F1 in the human genome
    Bieda, M
    Xu, XQ
    Singer, MA
    Green, R
    Farnham, PJ
    [J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 2006, 16 (05) : 595 - 605
  • [6] Repression of RAD51 gene expression by E2F4/p130 complexes in hypoxia
    Bindra, R. S.
    Glazer, P. M.
    [J]. ONCOGENE, 2007, 26 (14) : 2048 - 2057
  • [7] Mechanisms controlling cell cycle exit upon terminal differentiation
    Buttitta, Laura A.
    Edgar, Bruce A.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2007, 19 (06) : 697 - 704
  • [8] A common set of gene regulatory networks links metabolism and growth inhibition
    Cam, H
    Balciunaite, E
    Blais, A
    Spektor, A
    Scarpulla, RC
    Young, R
    Kluger, Y
    Dynlacht, BD
    [J]. MOLECULAR CELL, 2004, 16 (03) : 399 - 411
  • [9] E2F-6:: a novel member of the E2F family is an inhibitor of E2F-dependent transcription
    Cartwright, P
    Müller, H
    Wagener, C
    Holm, K
    Helin, K
    [J]. ONCOGENE, 1998, 17 (05) : 611 - 623
  • [10] Emerging roles of E2Fs in cancer: an exit from cell cycle control
    Chen, Hui-Zi
    Tsai, Shih-Yin
    Leone, Gustavo
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2009, 9 (11) : 785 - 797