An in vitro evaluation of wear and surface roughness of particulate filler composite resin after tooth brushing

被引:21
作者
Al Khuraif, Abdul Aziz A. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Appl Med Sci, Dept Dent Hlth, Riyadh 11433, Saudi Arabia
关键词
composites; wear; surface roughness; tooth brush abrasion; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; RESISTANCE; ABRASION; OCCLUSAL;
D O I
10.3109/00016357.2014.933251
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the influence of tooth brushing on wear and surface roughness of four different particulate filler composite resins. Materials and methods. Six specimens (2 mm thick and 8 mm in diameter) of each tested material (Filtek Z250-Microhybrid, SpectrumTPH3-Submicron hybrid, Filtek Z350XT Nanofiller and Filtek P90- Microhybrid) were prepared according to the manufacturer's directions. A brushing sequence of 5000, 10 000 and 20 000 cycles was performed for all the samples. A non-contact profilometer was used to determine average surface roughness (Ra) and wear of the material assessed using an analytic electronic balance at baseline and each cycle interval. The data obtained were analyzed using one-way ANOVAs and post-hoc multiple comparison tests. Paired t-test was used for comparisons between cycle intervals for each material. Analyses with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were also performed. Results. The resin composite Filtek P 90 presented an increase in percentage weight loss after final toothbrushing cycles over the rest of the materials. Brushing significantly increased roughness (Ra) for all composites. Filtek Z250, after brushing, was significantly rougher than the other resins followed by Filtek P 90, Spectrum TPH 3 and Filtek Z350 XT. However, SEM images indicated severe change in surface topography of 'sub-micron hybrid' specimen compared to each other after tooth brushing. Conclusions. Wear and surface roughness increased with each cycle interval for all the materials and one composite resin demonstrated a higher increase in surface roughness than the other three tested brands of composite resins. Not much difference was observed in the weight loss between tested samples.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 983
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[2]  
ASMUSSEN E, 1985, OPER DENT, V10, P61
[3]  
da Cunha MR, 2006, AM J DENT, V19, P364
[4]   Sorption, solubility, shrinkage and mechanical properties of "low-shrinkage" commercial resin composites [J].
Boaro, Leticia C. ;
Goncalves, Flavia ;
Guimaraes, Thayse C. ;
Ferracane, Jack L. ;
Pfeifer, Carmem S. ;
Braga, Roberto R. .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2013, 29 (04) :398-404
[5]   Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature [J].
Bollen, CML ;
Lambrechts, P ;
Quirynen, M .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1997, 13 (04) :258-269
[6]  
Braga SRM., 2010, J HLTH SCI I, V29, P85
[7]   Mechanical and physical properties of silorane and methacrylate-based composites [J].
Celerino de Moraes Porto, Isabel Cristina ;
Baggio de Aguiar, Flavio Henrique ;
Brandt, William Cunha ;
Susy Liporoni, Priscila Christiane .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2013, 41 (08) :732-739
[8]   THE EFFECT OF STORAGE MEDIA UPON THE SURFACE MICROHARDNESS AND ABRASION RESISTANCE OF 3 COMPOSITES [J].
CHADWICK, RG ;
MCCABE, JF ;
WALLS, AWG ;
STORER, R .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1990, 6 (02) :123-128
[9]  
deGee AJ, 1996, BIOMATERIALS, V17, P1327, DOI 10.1016/0142-9612(96)88679-0
[10]   THE EFFECT OF TOOTHBRUSHING ON A HYBRID COMPOSITE RESIN [J].
GOLDSTEIN, GR ;
LERNER, T .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1991, 66 (04) :498-500