Contact allergy to acrylates/methacrylates in the acrylate and nail acrylics series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens

被引:49
作者
Goon, Anthony Teik-Jin
Bruze, Magnus
Zimerson, Erik
Goh, Chee-Leok
Isaksson, Marlene
机构
[1] Natl Skin Ctr, Singapore 308205, Singapore
[2] Lund Univ, Malmo Univ Hosp, Dept Occupat & Environm Dermatol, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
关键词
acrylates; allergic contact dermatitis; industrial; nail technicians; patch test; screening;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01151.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
In a recent study we showed that all our dental personnel/patients were detected with 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) and 2,2-bis[4-(2-hydroxy-3-methacryloxypropoxy)phenyl]propane (bis-GMA). We studied 90 patients tested to the acrylate and nail acrylics series at our department over a 10 year period to see whether screening allergens could be found. Patch testing with an acrylate and nail acrylics series was performed. Among the 10 acrylate/methacrylate-allergic occupational dermatitis patients tested to the acrylate series, the most common allergens were triethyleneglycol diacrylate (TREGDA, 8), diethyleneglycol diacrylate (5), and 1,4-butanediol diacrylate (BUDA, 5). All 10 of these patients would have been picked up by a short screening series combining TREGDA, 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (2-HPMA), and BUDA or 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate (HDDA). Among the 14 acrylate/methacrylate-allergic nail patients, the most common allergens were ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA, 11), 2-HEMA, (9), and triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (9). Screening for 3 allergens i.e. 2-HEMA plus EGDMA plus TREGDA, would have detected all 14 nail patients. A short screening series combining 2-HEMA, EGDMA, TREGDA, 2-HPMA, bis-GMA, and BUDA or HDDA would have picked up all our past study patients (dental, industrial, and nail) with suspected allergy to acrylate/methacrylate allergens.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 27
页数:7
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
ALANKO K, 2005, ALLERGIC REACTIONS A
[2]   A new source of allergic contact dermatitis from UV-cured (meth)acrylate adhesive [J].
Brooke, RCC ;
Beck, MH .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2002, 47 (03) :179-180
[3]   Screening for contact allergy to artificial nails [J].
Constandt, L ;
Hecke, EV ;
Naeyaert, JM ;
Goossens, A .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2005, 52 (02) :73-77
[4]   Occupational contact allergy to (meth)acrylates [J].
Geukens, S ;
Goossens, A .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2001, 44 (03) :153-159
[5]   Contact allergy to (meth)acrylates in the dental series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens [J].
Goon, Anthony T. J. ;
Isaksson, Marlene ;
Zimerson, Erik ;
Goh, Chee Leok ;
Bruze, Magnus .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2006, 55 (04) :219-226
[6]  
ISAKSSON M, IN PRESS ALLERGIC CO
[7]   An epidemic of occupational contact dermatitis from an acrylic glue [J].
Kiec-Swierczynska, M ;
Krecisz, B ;
Swierczynska-Machura, D ;
Zaremba, J .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2005, 52 (03) :121-125
[8]  
KOPPULA SV, 1995, AM J CONTACT DERMATI, V6, P18
[9]   Acrylic reactions: a review of 56 cases [J].
Sood, A ;
Taylor, JS .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2003, 48 (06) :346-347