Weed Suppression in Only-Legume Cover Crop Mixtures

被引:21
|
作者
Elsalahy, Heba [1 ,2 ]
Doering, Thomas [3 ]
Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko [1 ,4 ]
Arends, Danny [5 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Agron & Crop Sci, Albrecht Thaer Weg 5, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Assiut Univ, Fac Sci, Bot & Microbiol Dept, Assiut 71516, Egypt
[3] Univ Bonn, Agroecol & Organ Farming Grp, Hugel 6, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
[4] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Res Area Land Use & Governance, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[5] Humboldt Univ, Albrecht Daniel Thaer Inst Agr & Hort Sci, Anim Breeding Biol & Mol Genet, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2019年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
asynchrony; crop diversification; forage legume; functional traits; interspecific interaction; mixed cropping; weed control; SPECIES EVENNESS; PLANT DIVERSITY; LIVING MULCHES; INTERCROPS; INVASION; YIELD; PRODUCTIVITY; DENSITY; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy9100648
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Weed suppression is a potential benefit of cover crop mixtures, as species diversity may allow for combining early and late-season competition with weeds. Here, we studied if this is possible for only-legume mixtures containing species with different growth rates, by testing two legumes, alsike clover (AC; Trifolium hybridum L.) and black medic (BM; Medicago lupulina L.) in two field trials sown in 2016 and 2017. Five AC:BM ratios (100:0, 67:33, 50:50, 33:67, and 0:100) were grown at three densities (50%, 100%, and 150% of recommended seed density). Cover crop and weed aboveground biomass (CCB and WB, respectively) were harvested three times, after establishment in spring (H1), in summer (H2), and in autumn after mulching (H3). Compared to fallow plots, all monocultures and mixtures showed early-season weed suppression in terms of biomass production and more efficiency over time with an average reduction of 42%, 52%, and 96% in 2016, and 39%, 55%, and 89% in 2017 at H1, H2, and H3, respectively. Out of 54 mixture treatments, only eight mixtures showed stronger weed suppression than monocultures. Mixtures reduced WB by 28%, as an average value, in 2017 compared to the respective monocultures, but not significantly in 2016, indicating that the crop diversity effect on weeds was dependent on the growing environment. Weed suppression was significantly higher at 100% and 150% seed density than 50%, but no significant differences were determined between 100% and 150% seed density. After mulching, no density effect was observed on CCB and WB. In conclusion, AC and BM can be used as a keystone species on weed suppression for sustainable agriculture as they possess plasticity to suppress weeds when higher biomass productivity is limited by environmental conditions. However, their diversity effects are time and condition dependent. Appropriate seed density and mulching can successfully be employed in weed management, but seed density may not have an effect after mulching.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Phylogenetic relatedness can influence cover crop-based weed suppression
    Uriel D. Menalled
    Richard G. Smith
    Stephane Cordeau
    Antonio DiTommaso
    Sarah J. Pethybridge
    Matthew R. Ryan
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [42] The use of cover crop for weed suppression and competition in limited-irrigation vineyards
    Hilmi Torun
    Phytoparasitica, 2024, 52
  • [43] Phylogenetic relatedness can influence cover crop-based weed suppression
    Menalled, Uriel D.
    Smith, Richard G.
    Cordeau, Stephane
    DiTommaso, Antonio
    Pethybridge, Sarah J.
    Ryan, Matthew R.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [44] Rolled Mixtures of Barley and Cereal Rye for Weed Suppression in Cover Crop-based Organic No-Till Planted Soybean
    Liebert, Jeffrey A.
    DiTommaso, Antonio
    Ryan, Matthew R.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2017, 65 (03) : 426 - 439
  • [45] Cover crop diversity for weed suppression and crop yield in a corn-soybean production system in Tennessee
    Sabbagh, Manuel J.
    Jagadamma, Sindhu
    Duncan, Lori A.
    Walker, Forbes R.
    Lee, Jaehoon
    Essington, Michael E.
    Arelli, Prakash
    Buschermohle, Michael J.
    AGROSYSTEMS GEOSCIENCES & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 3 (01)
  • [46] Comparison of Rye and Legume-Rye Cover Crop Mixtures for Vegetable Production in California
    Brennan, E. B.
    Boyd, N. S.
    Smith, R. F.
    Foster, P.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2011, 103 (02) : 449 - 463
  • [47] Legume cover crop management and organic amendments application: Effects on organic zucchini performance and weed competition
    Ciaccia, Corrado
    Montemurro, Francesco
    Campanelli, Gabriele
    Diacono, Mariangela
    Fiore, Angelo
    Canali, Stefano
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2015, 185 : 48 - 58
  • [48] Assessment of weed and crop fitness in cover crop residues for integrated weed management
    Williams, MM
    Mortensen, DA
    Doran, JW
    WEED SCIENCE, 1998, 46 (05) : 595 - 603
  • [49] Use of a Rolled-rye Cover Crop for Weed Suppression in No-Till Soybeans
    Mischler, Ruth A.
    Curran, William S.
    Duiker, Sjoerd W.
    Hyde, Jeffrey A.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 24 (03) : 253 - 261
  • [50] Knowledge of Cover Crop Seed Traits and Treatments to Enhance Weed Suppression: A Narrative Review
    Nosratti, Iraj
    Korres, Nicholas E.
    Cordeau, Stephane
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (07):