Weed Suppression in Only-Legume Cover Crop Mixtures

被引:21
|
作者
Elsalahy, Heba [1 ,2 ]
Doering, Thomas [3 ]
Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko [1 ,4 ]
Arends, Danny [5 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Agron & Crop Sci, Albrecht Thaer Weg 5, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Assiut Univ, Fac Sci, Bot & Microbiol Dept, Assiut 71516, Egypt
[3] Univ Bonn, Agroecol & Organ Farming Grp, Hugel 6, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
[4] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Res Area Land Use & Governance, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[5] Humboldt Univ, Albrecht Daniel Thaer Inst Agr & Hort Sci, Anim Breeding Biol & Mol Genet, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2019年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
asynchrony; crop diversification; forage legume; functional traits; interspecific interaction; mixed cropping; weed control; SPECIES EVENNESS; PLANT DIVERSITY; LIVING MULCHES; INTERCROPS; INVASION; YIELD; PRODUCTIVITY; DENSITY; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy9100648
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Weed suppression is a potential benefit of cover crop mixtures, as species diversity may allow for combining early and late-season competition with weeds. Here, we studied if this is possible for only-legume mixtures containing species with different growth rates, by testing two legumes, alsike clover (AC; Trifolium hybridum L.) and black medic (BM; Medicago lupulina L.) in two field trials sown in 2016 and 2017. Five AC:BM ratios (100:0, 67:33, 50:50, 33:67, and 0:100) were grown at three densities (50%, 100%, and 150% of recommended seed density). Cover crop and weed aboveground biomass (CCB and WB, respectively) were harvested three times, after establishment in spring (H1), in summer (H2), and in autumn after mulching (H3). Compared to fallow plots, all monocultures and mixtures showed early-season weed suppression in terms of biomass production and more efficiency over time with an average reduction of 42%, 52%, and 96% in 2016, and 39%, 55%, and 89% in 2017 at H1, H2, and H3, respectively. Out of 54 mixture treatments, only eight mixtures showed stronger weed suppression than monocultures. Mixtures reduced WB by 28%, as an average value, in 2017 compared to the respective monocultures, but not significantly in 2016, indicating that the crop diversity effect on weeds was dependent on the growing environment. Weed suppression was significantly higher at 100% and 150% seed density than 50%, but no significant differences were determined between 100% and 150% seed density. After mulching, no density effect was observed on CCB and WB. In conclusion, AC and BM can be used as a keystone species on weed suppression for sustainable agriculture as they possess plasticity to suppress weeds when higher biomass productivity is limited by environmental conditions. However, their diversity effects are time and condition dependent. Appropriate seed density and mulching can successfully be employed in weed management, but seed density may not have an effect after mulching.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Do cover crop sowing date and fertilization affect field weed suppression?
    Sturm, Dominic J.
    Kunz, Christoph
    Peteinatos, Gerassimos
    Gerhards, Roland
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 63 (02) : 82 - 88
  • [32] Are cover crop mixtures better at suppressing weeds than cover crop monocultures?
    Smith, Richard G.
    Warren, Nicholas D.
    Cordeau, Stephane
    WEED SCIENCE, 2020, 68 (02) : 186 - 194
  • [33] Comparison of Rye and Legume-Rye Cover Crop Mixtures for Vegetable Production in California
    Brennan, E. B.
    Boyd, N. S.
    Smith, R. F.
    Foster, P.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2011, 103 (02) : 449 - 463
  • [34] Nitrogen balances in farmers fields under alternative uses of a cover crop legume: a case study from Nicaragua
    Douxchamps, Sabine
    Humbert, Francois-Lionel
    van der Hoek, Rein
    Mena, Martin
    Bernasconi, Stefano M.
    Schmidt, Axel
    Rao, Idupulapati
    Frossard, Emmanuel
    Oberson, Astrid
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2010, 88 (03) : 447 - 462
  • [35] Cover crop residue components and their effect on summer annual weed suppression in corn and soybean
    Pittman, Kara B.
    Barney, Jacob N.
    Flessner, Michael L.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2020, 68 (03) : 301 - 310
  • [36] Suppression of weed and insect populations by living cover crop mulches in organic squash production
    Bruce, Dylan
    Silva, Erin M. M.
    Dawson, J. C.
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2022, 6
  • [37] Cover-Crop Species as Distinct Biotic Filters in Weed Community Assembly
    Smith, Richard G.
    Atwood, Lesley W.
    Pollnac, Fredric W.
    Warren, Nicholas D.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2015, 63 (01) : 282 - 295
  • [38] Effect of Seeding Rate and Planting Arrangement on Rye Cover Crop and Weed Growth
    Boyd, Nathan S.
    Brennan, Eric B.
    Smith, Richard F.
    Yokota, Ron
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2009, 101 (01) : 47 - 51
  • [39] Crop Biomass Not Species Richness Drives Weed Suppression in Warm-Season Annual Grass-Legume Intercrops in the Northeast
    Bybee-Finley, K. Ann
    Mirsky, Steven B.
    Ryan, Matthew R.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2017, 65 (05) : 669 - 680
  • [40] Weed Control Ability of Single Sown Cover Crops Compared to Species Mixtures
    Schappert, Alexandra
    Schumacher, Matthias
    Gerhards, Roland
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2019, 9 (06):