Weed Suppression in Only-Legume Cover Crop Mixtures

被引:21
|
作者
Elsalahy, Heba [1 ,2 ]
Doering, Thomas [3 ]
Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko [1 ,4 ]
Arends, Danny [5 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Agron & Crop Sci, Albrecht Thaer Weg 5, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Assiut Univ, Fac Sci, Bot & Microbiol Dept, Assiut 71516, Egypt
[3] Univ Bonn, Agroecol & Organ Farming Grp, Hugel 6, D-53121 Bonn, Germany
[4] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Res Area Land Use & Governance, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[5] Humboldt Univ, Albrecht Daniel Thaer Inst Agr & Hort Sci, Anim Breeding Biol & Mol Genet, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2019年 / 9卷 / 10期
关键词
asynchrony; crop diversification; forage legume; functional traits; interspecific interaction; mixed cropping; weed control; SPECIES EVENNESS; PLANT DIVERSITY; LIVING MULCHES; INTERCROPS; INVASION; YIELD; PRODUCTIVITY; DENSITY; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy9100648
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Weed suppression is a potential benefit of cover crop mixtures, as species diversity may allow for combining early and late-season competition with weeds. Here, we studied if this is possible for only-legume mixtures containing species with different growth rates, by testing two legumes, alsike clover (AC; Trifolium hybridum L.) and black medic (BM; Medicago lupulina L.) in two field trials sown in 2016 and 2017. Five AC:BM ratios (100:0, 67:33, 50:50, 33:67, and 0:100) were grown at three densities (50%, 100%, and 150% of recommended seed density). Cover crop and weed aboveground biomass (CCB and WB, respectively) were harvested three times, after establishment in spring (H1), in summer (H2), and in autumn after mulching (H3). Compared to fallow plots, all monocultures and mixtures showed early-season weed suppression in terms of biomass production and more efficiency over time with an average reduction of 42%, 52%, and 96% in 2016, and 39%, 55%, and 89% in 2017 at H1, H2, and H3, respectively. Out of 54 mixture treatments, only eight mixtures showed stronger weed suppression than monocultures. Mixtures reduced WB by 28%, as an average value, in 2017 compared to the respective monocultures, but not significantly in 2016, indicating that the crop diversity effect on weeds was dependent on the growing environment. Weed suppression was significantly higher at 100% and 150% seed density than 50%, but no significant differences were determined between 100% and 150% seed density. After mulching, no density effect was observed on CCB and WB. In conclusion, AC and BM can be used as a keystone species on weed suppression for sustainable agriculture as they possess plasticity to suppress weeds when higher biomass productivity is limited by environmental conditions. However, their diversity effects are time and condition dependent. Appropriate seed density and mulching can successfully be employed in weed management, but seed density may not have an effect after mulching.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of cover crops mixtures on weed suppression capacity in a dry sub-humid environment of Argentina
    Malaspina, Micaela
    Chantre, Guillermo Ruben
    Yanniccari, Marcos
    FRONTIERS IN AGRONOMY, 2024, 5
  • [22] Weed Suppression and Early Sugar Beet Development under Different Cover Crop Mulches
    Kunz, Christoph
    Sturm, Dominic J.
    Soekefeld, Markus
    Gerhards, Roland
    PLANT PROTECTION SCIENCE, 2017, 53 (03) : 187 - 193
  • [23] Weed control under increasing cover crop diversity in tropical summer and winter
    Negrier, Adrien
    Marnotte, Pascal
    Hoareau, Julie
    Viaud, Pauline
    Auzoux, Sandrine
    Techer, Patrick
    Schwartz, Marion
    Ripoche, Aude
    Christina, Mathias
    BIOTECHNOLOGIE AGRONOMIE SOCIETE ET ENVIRONNEMENT, 2023, 27 (02): : 61 - 73
  • [24] Oat Cover Crop and No-tillage Can Provide Weed Suppression and Alter Weed Community Dynamics in Sweet Corn
    Dawson, Emma K.
    Boyhan, George E.
    Coolong, Tim
    Basinger, Nicholas T.
    McNeill, Ryan
    HORTTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 31 (06) : 733 - +
  • [25] Yield and Weed Suppression of Crop Mixtures in Organic and Conventional Systems of the Western Canadian Prairie
    Nelson, A. G.
    Pswarayi, A.
    Quideau, S.
    Frick, B.
    Spaner, D.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2012, 104 (03) : 756 - 762
  • [26] Weed Suppressive Ability of Cover Crop Mixtures Compared to Repeated Stubble Tillage and Glyphosate Treatments
    Schappert, Alexandra
    Messelhaeuser, Miriam H.
    Saile, Marcus
    Peteinatos, Gerassimos G.
    Gerhards, Roland
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2018, 8 (09):
  • [27] IN ORGANIC CROP ROTATION WINTER COVER CROPS IMPROVE SOIL, WEED SUPPRESSION AND CROP YIELDS
    Madsen, Helena
    Talgre, Liina
    Eremeev, Viatcheslav
    Luik, Anne
    Maeorg, Erkki
    NORDIC VIEW TO SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, : 91 - 96
  • [28] Cover crop crucifer-legume mixtures provide effective nitrate catch crop and nitrogen green manure ecosystem services
    Couedel, Antoine
    Alletto, Lionel
    Tribouillois, Helene
    Justes, Eric
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 254 : 50 - 59
  • [29] Impact of Cover Crop Management on Level of Weed Suppression: A Meta-Analysis
    Osipitan, O. Adewale
    Dille, Anita
    Assefa, Yared
    Radicetti, Emanuele
    Ayeni, Albert
    Knezevic, Stevan Z.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2019, 59 (03) : 833 - 842
  • [30] Phylogenetic relatedness can influence cover crop-based weed suppression
    Menalled, Uriel D.
    Smith, Richard G.
    Cordeau, Stephane
    DiTommaso, Antonio
    Pethybridge, Sarah J.
    Ryan, Matthew R.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)